ArrantPariah wrote:
I wouldn't interpret it as a deliberate attempt to be insulting--more of a cultural misunderstanding, an honest question, with perhaps a somewhat unfortunate choice of words.
I disagree on the basis that I pointed out earlier that it was unacceptable and highly offensive and inaccurate, and he continued to state it, full well knowing that - and knowing it carried, at the very least, racist implications.
ArrantParia wrote:
I'm guessing that, in South America, it would be part of the ritual.
A woman might not want to appear a slut, or to be too easy. Therefore, she says "No" the first time (or first several times), expecting that he will be back. If she smiles sweetly and twists her hair while saying "No", then that will encourage him to up the ante. If she says "NO!" with a big scowl on her face, then he will probably not return.
Pretty much this. The context of the word "no" is heavily dependent on body language - that is essentially where the line is.
I have seen girls say no but that are interested, only 5 minutes later, to be the one to initate the kiss.
I have also seen girls say no, and refuse to even smile at the guy, and they leave immediately usually.
The line is body language in combination with the word "no" - usually both must be consistent to indicate a true refusal, in which case the refusal will be taken seriously and he will no longer pursue her.
And yes Teq, sexual harassment is taken seriously.
If I am out alone at a club, often I end up hanging out with a group for the night and if someone is bothering me when I have told them no repeatedly, other guys from the group, even if they don't know me well, will step in and force the other guy to back off if they can see I said no enough times and meant seriously, and it is harassment.
Last edited by Kjas on 04 Sep 2012, 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.