sly279 wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
What do you mean when you say that you don't use "those"?
He means kg I think, America it is lbs.
Sly: 100kg is about 220lbs.
And I agree with Peacesells.
For example I might describe the body type I am attracted to as 'chubby girls/females', which is another way of saying 'slightly overweight'. Is this necessarily bad? No, because I said that I LIKE chubby girls, not that 'you're fat and I hate it but your other things make up for it'.
If someone really are a medically overweight person, then I will classify them as one.
Same thing with any other qualities.
its the same as saying I like fat and ugly women they look like pigs. I am willing to bet no woman who hears that will be happy about it.
I don't like women who wieght 100 pounds or lest. like what. that's like 2 dog food bags.

this girl weighs 223 pounds. I wouldn't' call her fat. I'd call her average. shes not skinny no. but there's between skinny and fat. I don't much care for skinny girls, they are too bony not enough cushion.
I do not call people by what society trends currently deem. I go by what I think and what is reality . what society deems fat ust to be normal, what is skinny now use to be considered unhealthy. but take a computer and alter a imagine to make a girl look more thin and then get society to think thats skinny and normal then people attempt to accheive that even though its not real in the picture.
anyways my point is when you really care about people like I do you don't call them mean names and say oh well I 'm only doing what society does.
Yes i know models in magazines are freakishly skinny and most women are actually average. That's not what I mean, sir.
Me I find thin, average and chubby figure attractive.
I am talking about actual
medically overweight though. As in, scientifically overweight.
I won't constantly remind them that they're overweight but I'm not going to completely ignore the fact.
It is just my opinion too. My opinion goes by science and medical.
Tall women are
generally considered less attractive than shorter females.
Let's say I like shorter women myself. But if I'm dating a 6'2'' woman I'm not going to call her short just because she looks 'short' to me.
If I am partner is dark-skinned than I will classify them as dark skinned. Why would I say they are white?
If I am dating a woman then I'm dating a woman, not a man. If I'm dating a white person then they are white. If I'm dating a medically overweight woman then she is medically overweight.
But I like medically overweight, so what's the issue?
Just like if I like a white woman, then what's the issue if my girlfriend is white?
This is what 'same thing with other qualities' means. If their hair is naturally blonde than their hair is naturally blonde. I can't lie to myself and say it is brown hair.
These are just facts. Not 'society trends'. Society trends are the lies, yes.
And I am like you Sly. I have a more loose definition of curvy. To me slightly overweight women can still be 'curvy'. Average is not thin but not medically overweight, etc.
So maybe the OP used 'mediocre' the wrong word. But like I said maybe they just saying what societies standards of 'mediocre' is.
SOCIETIES words, not his own. Not his actual opinion which he later explained properly.
Don't hate the player, hate the game (society standards on what is attractive).