Girls—do you care about height?

Page 4 of 8 [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,323
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Dec 2017, 5:37 pm

XFilesGeek, usually when men say for example that they want a non fat woman, you never see them talking about specific weight numbers, Maximum and Minimum and range and stuff, you never see men saying something like:
"She has to be at least 55 Kg, and Max 59.5 Kg; and has to be able to fit under my elbow otherwise it's a dealbreaker for me".

While on the other hand, when you see women talk about height, plenty of them talk about specific measures and numbers, maximum and minimum and other bla bla. ie. "He has to be a least 6.7' and not more than 7.1' or else it's a dealbreaker".

You can't deny this sex difference.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

09 Dec 2017, 5:43 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
The narrative here is that men can have standards, but the women can't.

If you have a vagina, you're supposed to jump on whatever d_ck presents itself, otherwise, you're "too picky" and deserve to be alone.


Perfect example of a straw man. If you're a 4/10, and don't want to date another 4/10, expect to stay single.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

09 Dec 2017, 7:09 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
sly279 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The narrative here is that men can have standards, but the women can't.

If you have a vagina, you're supposed to jump on whatever d_ck presents itself, otherwise, you're "too picky" and deserve to be alone.

Not it’s just women have far far far higher standards then men, which makes a lot of women alone for ever,
Saw a video where he disused a poll that 27% of polled people 18-30 said they’d date a android. With such high % of single people in my generation and high levels of depression and loneliness and building bitterness and resentment. How is women’s super high unrealistic standards helping anyone! History will look back at us as the worst generation to ever exist


I'd reply, but I have no idea what you just said.


A lot of women are too picky. We aren’t saying they should have zero standards. But they should have less or more realistic ones. Men want to date freaking robots because women won’t date them and would rather b***h online about how there’s no good men.

Do you think a society where half the population is single is good for future? Do you think a society where 25% of the population wants to date androids is good? Is mass depression and loneliness good? No to all.
A lot of women have become far too picky with their egos bloated by modern technology and believing being born a female makes them superior and deserving of a well off, Tao handsome mans love. Welp as many of them are finding out even if they won’t admit it they aren’t deserving, and thus they are alone and bitter. And it’s all their own doing.
Same as people who are unemployed cause they’re waiting for that dream job and rejecting other job offers cause they aren’t good enough. Surely having a job is better then no job? But no all regards hang out for that rockstar job. How many people get their dream job? How many women get their Prince Charming? Not many. Life is about being realistic and accepting reality. What’s wrong with a loya, kind, guy who’s ok looking, and works a low paying job? Isn’t he better then an imaginary guy they’ll wait their whole lives for and who will likely never show up?



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

09 Dec 2017, 7:11 pm

Kurgan wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The narrative here is that men can have standards, but the women can't.

If you have a vagina, you're supposed to jump on whatever d_ck presents itself, otherwise, you're "too picky" and deserve to be alone.


Perfect example of a straw man. If you're a 4/10, and don't want to date another 4/10, expect to stay single.

True that. Why society says a woman who’s 2/10 can get a male who’s 10/10. She’s female after all. Society is lying to women and men. I hate society. Society will tell any lie to keep us making more money for the elite.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

09 Dec 2017, 9:47 pm

A woman who is supposedly "2-10" might be "10-10" to me.

I'm probably a "4-10" according to an "objective standard"---but I've had people say that I'm pretty close to a "10-10."



MakaylaTheAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Age: 29
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 14,565
Location: O'er the land of the so-called free and the home of the self-proclaimed brave. (Oregon)

09 Dec 2017, 10:24 pm

height doesn't particularly bother me much.


_________________
Hi there! Please refer to me as Moss. Unable to change my username to reflect that change. Have a nice day. <3


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

09 Dec 2017, 10:25 pm

When two people are in bed, and they are kissing, they are the same height.



Fireblossom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,585

10 Dec 2017, 10:32 am

sly279 wrote:
Do you think a society where half the population is single is good for future?


Good for society and those left single? Probably not. Good for this planet? Definitely. Less couples means less children which means less people using the planet's resources. Everything has a silver lining. :)



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,323
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

10 Dec 2017, 2:57 pm

Fireblossom wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Do you think a society where half the population is single is good for future?


Good for society and those left single? Probably not. Good for this planet? Definitely. Less couples means less children which means less people using the planet's resources. Everything has a silver lining. :)


No, less couples doesn't necessarily means less children. It may actually leads to more children growing without a father.

Look at the percentage of single moms in the African-American community of the US for instance.



Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

10 Dec 2017, 2:59 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Fireblossom wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Do you think a society where half the population is single is good for future?


Good for society and those left single? Probably not. Good for this planet? Definitely. Less couples means less children which means less people using the planet's resources. Everything has a silver lining. :)


No, less couples doesn't necessarily means less children. It may actually leads to more children growing without a father.

Look at the percentage of single moms in the African-American community of the US for instance.


85% of men in prison grew up without a father



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

10 Dec 2017, 5:10 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
A woman who is supposedly "2-10" might be "10-10" to me.

I'm probably a "4-10" according to an "objective standard"---but I've had people say that I'm pretty close to a "10-10."


Most women are 10/10 to me. I don’t seem capable of rating women. They’re either attractive to me(bad cause means they too good for me) or they unattractive to me(bad cause I can’t date them either)

I might add I find 95% or more of women attractive.

kraftiekortie wrote:
When two people are in bed, and they are kissing, they are the same height.

But lots of kissing, hugging etc take place while not laying in bed. And height difference makes a bunch of sexual positions (including some thst improve female pleasure) impossible to do.



MariaTheFictionkin
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 29 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,254

10 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm

sly279 wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
A woman who is supposedly "2-10" might be "10-10" to me.

I'm probably a "4-10" according to an "objective standard"---but I've had people say that I'm pretty close to a "10-10."


Most women are 10/10 to me. I don’t seem capable of rating women. They’re either attractive to me(bad cause means they too good for me) or they unattractive to me(bad cause I can’t date them either)

I might add I find 95% or more of women attractive.

kraftiekortie wrote:
When two people are in bed, and they are kissing, they are the same height.

But lots of kissing, hugging etc take place while not laying in bed. And height difference makes a bunch of sexual positions (including some thst improve female pleasure) impossible to do.


Ummm...I don't think so... If there is any sort of difficulties, there are plenty of ways around that and still achieve what any ideal tall person can do.


_________________
[Inactive - I have left WP permanently]


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

10 Dec 2017, 5:18 pm

Fireblossom wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Do you think a society where half the population is single is good for future?


Good for society and those left single? Probably not. Good for this planet? Definitely. Less couples means less children which means less people using the planet's resources. Everything has a silver lining. :)


So your ok with western civilization dying out while Muslims and Chinese overpopulate and take over? Cause it’s only western civilization that is having high singleness and negative population increase. Western civilization dying out won’t decrease the worlds population at all. For every less kids we have China and Islamic nations have 3-4 then there’s India who’s als rapidly increasing population.
I’m sure we’ll have another plaque or world war thst will kill billions and reset the population like has been happening in the past. I’d have as many kids as I could if I was able to :p

What’s the thing someone said. Saving earth isn’t about the planet. The planet is a ball of rock and dirt, it’s been around for millions of years, it’ll be around for millions of years after us. Saving the earth is about saving people and animals. The earth would survive as a Baren waste land, if we nuked the whole planet, the earth would survive and in time recover its greenness. It’s the lifeforms that would die without plants and trees not earth. Earth use to be a volcanic lava filled planet. It hasn’t always been green and it won’t always be green either. We’re in fact way overdue for a iceage. We’re in an adnormally long warm period in earths history.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

10 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm

MariaTheFictionkin wrote:
sly279 wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
A woman who is supposedly "2-10" might be "10-10" to me.

I'm probably a "4-10" according to an "objective standard"---but I've had people say that I'm pretty close to a "10-10."


Most women are 10/10 to me. I don’t seem capable of rating women. They’re either attractive to me(bad cause means they too good for me) or they unattractive to me(bad cause I can’t date them either)

I might add I find 95% or more of women attractive.

kraftiekortie wrote:
When two people are in bed, and they are kissing, they are the same height.

But lots of kissing, hugging etc take place while not laying in bed. And height difference makes a bunch of sexual positions (including some thst improve female pleasure) impossible to do.


Ummm...I don't think so... If there is any sort of difficulties, there are plenty of ways around that and still achieve what any ideal tall person can do.


Nope. But in order to discuss it we’d have to make a thread in the adult section, sexual talk here will get this thread locked.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

10 Dec 2017, 6:03 pm

I'm not a "man of many positions".....but I've learned to "get the job done." Communication is key, for both parties.



komamanga
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,343
Location: CzechRep.

10 Dec 2017, 6:12 pm

I'm about 5'7'' and prefer a guy that's taller than me as I'm kinda big (at least where I come from).