Would you be willing to enter a sexless relationship?

Page 4 of 9 [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next


Would you enter a sexless relationship?
Yes-I'm male 27%  27%  [ 16 ]
Yes-I'm female 24%  24%  [ 14 ]
No- I'm male 32%  32%  [ 19 ]
No- I'm female 17%  17%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 59

Arganger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,707
Location: Colorado

05 Dec 2018, 4:29 pm

Raleigh wrote:
Maybe you could look for a paraplegic or other similarly impaired person??


Most Paraplegic people actually can and do have sex.
I wouldn't mind dating someone with any kind of disability, however it doesn't solve the problems.


_________________
Diagnosed autistic level 2, ODD, anxiety, dyspraxic, essential tremors, depression (Doubted), CAPD, hyper mobility syndrome
Suspected; PTSD (Treated, as my counselor did notice), possible PCOS, PMDD, Learning disabilities (Sure of it, unknown what they are), possibly something wrong with immune system (Sick about as much as I'm not) Possible EDS- hyper mobility type (Will be getting tested, suggested by doctor) dysautonomia


Magna
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,932

05 Dec 2018, 4:30 pm

modernmax wrote:
Or she could just be a single mom.


Unless I misunderstand, she's wanting a romantic relationship and the companionship it brings but without sex. Such things do exist but I think they're mainly situations where people are either too elderly to have relations any longer but are still in love or both people have sustained physical or mental trauma to the point of permanently disabling the desire for sex.

I don't believe it would be possible for two people who are "normal" and "healthy" to agree to a non-sexual romantic relationship and both be equally OK with it.

I stressed the two words above in quotes and italics for the purpose of using them as generally defined rather than make any implications or assertions that a person wanting a non-sexual romantic relationship would be the opposite of those things: "abnormal" or "unhealthy". I'm not one to judge in that regard.



graceksjp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Age: 26
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,719
Location: Down the rabbit hole

05 Dec 2018, 5:07 pm

Ya know I find it a little sad how many people are saying its impossible to have a healthy, loving, and lasting relationship without sex. You're essentially saying that your ability to love someone hinders on their ability to please you in bed. So if the love of your life couldnt perform would you stop loving them? If they had a medical reason for being unable to have sex is that it? After years of love and devotion you would drop them just because they can no longer have sex? If your child told you they were asexual are you going to tell them that no one will ever love them? There are plenty of people who dont have sex that often or at all and are still perfectly happy.
I think sex is overrated. It is way over-prioritized in our society. Sex, when done merely for pleasure, is but another addictive, diminishing returns activity like drinking or doing drugs.
I mean, theres so much more to loving a person than having sex all the time. And theres nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex. I feel really bad for how asexual people are treated by society. Theres nothing wrong with them!


_________________
*404 Error: Inspirational quote not found*


Raleigh
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2014
Age: 126
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,629
Location: Out of my mind

05 Dec 2018, 5:13 pm

^ not at all.
I couldn't stop loving someone for those reasons.
And love comes before any thought of sex for me.
If you've never experienced sex in a loving relationship I guess it's hard to comprehend the wonder of it.


_________________
It's like I'm sleepwalking


that1weirdgrrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,090
Location: Between my dreams and your fantasies

05 Dec 2018, 5:40 pm

Raleigh wrote:
^ not at all.
I couldn't stop loving someone for those reasons.
And love comes before any thought of sex for me.
If you've never experienced sex in a loving relationship I guess it's hard to comprehend the wonder of it.


Same here... I don't want sex with someone if I don't love them. But if I did love them, then I'd eventually want sex with them....


_________________
...what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction!


modernmax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,458
Location: Near Chicago

05 Dec 2018, 5:51 pm

graceksjp wrote:
Ya know I find it a little sad how many people are saying its impossible to have a healthy, loving, and lasting relationship without sex. You're essentially saying that your ability to love someone hinders on their ability to please you in bed. So if the love of your life couldnt perform would you stop loving them? If they had a medical reason for being unable to have sex is that it? After years of love and devotion you would drop them just because they can no longer have sex? If your child told you they were asexual are you going to tell them that no one will ever love them? There are plenty of people who dont have sex that often or at all and are still perfectly happy.
I think sex is overrated. It is way over-prioritized in our society. Sex, when done merely for pleasure, is but another addictive, diminishing returns activity like drinking or doing drugs.
I mean, theres so much more to loving a person than having sex all the time. And theres nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex. I feel really bad for how asexual people are treated by society. Theres nothing wrong with them!


Think of it like never watching a movie again. You've still got tv shows, but sometimes you need a little more. The relationship can be managed, but it just simply won't be quite as good as it could be.


_________________
This is not a signature, I just make a line and write this under it every time I post.


The Grand Inquisitor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,785

05 Dec 2018, 6:30 pm

graceksjp wrote:
Ya know I find it a little sad how many people are saying its impossible to have a healthy, loving, and lasting relationship without sex. You're essentially saying that your ability to love someone hinders on their ability to please you in bed. So if the love of your life couldnt perform would you stop loving them? If they had a medical reason for being unable to have sex is that it? After years of love and devotion you would drop them just because they can no longer have sex? If your child told you they were asexual are you going to tell them that no one will ever love them? There are plenty of people who dont have sex that often or at all and are still perfectly happy.
I think sex is overrated. It is way over-prioritized in our society. Sex, when done merely for pleasure, is but another addictive, diminishing returns activity like drinking or doing drugs.
I mean, theres so much more to loving a person than having sex all the time. And theres nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex. I feel really bad for how asexual people are treated by society. Theres nothing wrong with them!

If you have sexual desires and you never get to have sex with another person, there's no ifs or buts about it, that's going to cause a problem. It's not about the focal point of a relationship being about sex, it's the fact that you're making it so that the only sexual outlet that a potential partner has is a solo one, and most people who have sexual urges aren't going to be okay with that arrangement. Even if not practiced often, sex is an essential part of most relationships, and when you're in a relationship you can generally only get it from your partner, so saying it's off the table indefinitely is going to turn most people off



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Dec 2018, 6:33 pm

graceksjp wrote:
I would. I mean, Im not going to fall in love with somebody based on how good they are in bed. Im going to fall in love with who they are as a person. So if we both decide that we dont want to have a lot of sex, than thats fine. However, just because we are not engaged in the actual act of sexual intercourse would not necessarily mean we cannot be intimate or romantic. I am perfectly capable of loving someone without having to act like a dog in heat.
In my personal opinion you dont need sex to have a loving relationship and its sad that sex gets so hyped up in society. Sex is simply a physical act to fulfill the biological need of reproduction in the human species. Somewhere along the line society slapped a whole lot of emotions and symbolism on it and now somehow sex=love. Which is ironic since sex can also mean something a whole lot worse than love. Ive been in plenty of situations where sex was almost the outcome and I certainly did not love that person or want to be anywhere near that intimate with them. A lot of people have loveless sex. Theres literally an industry for it. Besides, in my experience its awkward, gross, and hurts like hell and I dont ever want to get pregnant, sooo nah man Im good.

Sex is an extremely emotionally bonding experience.



The Grand Inquisitor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,785

05 Dec 2018, 6:36 pm

modernmax wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
Arganger wrote:
Here is part of my problem;
My non negotiables conflict a little.
Obviously no sex.
Most Aces are atheists, But I am only willing to date a Christian because of how I see relationships.
I want to adopt kids, so people would have to be willing to both have kids and no sex, which seems to be a hard sell.

I included women because I was curious how the answers would very, while I am attracted the same to men and women, because of religious reasons I am unwilling to date girls.

So basically you want things a very specific way, and all your way. Unless you're lucky enough to find a unicorn who shares the same desires as you to not have sex and to adopt, either you'd best not to bother with relationships or you'll need to compromise. Most men believe sex is non-negotiable in a relationship, so you might have to settle for being alone or adopting a few cats.


Or she could just be a single mom.

Well I personally think a loving mother and father are the most optimal people to raise a child. I think particularly for boys a positive male role model is very important, and denying them that is just selfish. There's a reason it takes a mother and father to produce offspring, and if people were more responsible we wouldn't see this epidemic of single parent households.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Dec 2018, 6:38 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I don't really have any severe sensory issues; though, at first, I was somewhat averse to being physically intimate with another person.

It would be pretty frustrating for me to be bereft of making love----but if I loved the person enough, I could handle this bereftness through other methodology (e.g., masturbation).

If ALL physical affection was withheld from me, then there might be more reluctance to commit to a marriage.

Sex doesn't have to be this thing which permeates my very soul. There's more to love than just sex.

And if they don’t want you to masticate either or look at other women?

All physical affection would have to be withheld cause it usually leads to sex for men. It’ll definitely turn on most men and women.

No ones saying there isn’t but we are saying relationships for most people need sex to susceed, without people resent each other and eventually cheat to get their needs met elsewhere then they fall for that person since sex is emotionally bonding for most.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Dec 2018, 6:42 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
I'm sure we all know that quite a few long-term marriages wind up "sexless" eventually.

Quite a few end up loveless too hench divorce rates.
Neither start out sexless or loveless.
I’d bet most wouldn’t have gotten in a relationship if they knew it’d be sexless or lovlesss

Impinge if someone was like oh before we get in a relationship you should know in 10 years we won’t have sex anymore and I won’t really love you anymore, how many people would agree to get in relationship?



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Dec 2018, 6:46 pm

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
Raleigh wrote:
^ not at all.
I couldn't stop loving someone for those reasons.
And love comes before any thought of sex for me.
If you've never experienced sex in a loving relationship I guess it's hard to comprehend the wonder of it.


Same here... I don't want sex with someone if I don't love them. But if I did love them, then I'd eventually want sex with them....


This.

I find it funny people are like all you care about is sex If you want sex in a relationship it same isn’t said about people with other requirements for relationships.



nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

05 Dec 2018, 7:12 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
^ But to be fair , low T and ED are becoming more common among guys nowadays, so maybe that's why we are seeing more preferring sexless relationships?
Lots of psych meds can cause those problems & those of us on the spectrum tend to be on psych meds more than the general population


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Dec 2018, 7:19 pm

nick007 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
^ But to be fair , low T and ED are becoming more common among guys nowadays, so maybe that's why we are seeing more preferring sexless relationships?
Lots of psych meds can cause those problems & those of us on the spectrum tend to be on psych meds more than the general population

I’m not on meds so why am I not competitive or ambitious?
But I also have high sex drive.



Arganger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,707
Location: Colorado

05 Dec 2018, 9:44 pm

The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
modernmax wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
Arganger wrote:
Here is part of my problem;
My non negotiables conflict a little.
Obviously no sex.
Most Aces are atheists, But I am only willing to date a Christian because of how I see relationships.
I want to adopt kids, so people would have to be willing to both have kids and no sex, which seems to be a hard sell.

I included women because I was curious how the answers would very, while I am attracted the same to men and women, because of religious reasons I am unwilling to date girls.

So basically you want things a very specific way, and all your way. Unless you're lucky enough to find a unicorn who shares the same desires as you to not have sex and to adopt, either you'd best not to bother with relationships or you'll need to compromise. Most men believe sex is non-negotiable in a relationship, so you might have to settle for being alone or adopting a few cats.


Or she could just be a single mom.

Well I personally think a loving mother and father are the most optimal people to raise a child. I think particularly for boys a positive male role model is very important, and denying them that is just selfish. There's a reason it takes a mother and father to produce offspring, and if people were more responsible we wouldn't see this epidemic of single parent households.


I disagree. I was raised by a single mother (My dad died when I was five) and I turned out fine.
The only ways it affected me is not really understanding men and finding relationships extra confusing.

Regardless, one mom is better than none.


_________________
Diagnosed autistic level 2, ODD, anxiety, dyspraxic, essential tremors, depression (Doubted), CAPD, hyper mobility syndrome
Suspected; PTSD (Treated, as my counselor did notice), possible PCOS, PMDD, Learning disabilities (Sure of it, unknown what they are), possibly something wrong with immune system (Sick about as much as I'm not) Possible EDS- hyper mobility type (Will be getting tested, suggested by doctor) dysautonomia


The Grand Inquisitor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,785

06 Dec 2018, 12:15 am

Arganger wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
modernmax wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
Arganger wrote:
Here is part of my problem;
My non negotiables conflict a little.
Obviously no sex.
Most Aces are atheists, But I am only willing to date a Christian because of how I see relationships.
I want to adopt kids, so people would have to be willing to both have kids and no sex, which seems to be a hard sell.

I included women because I was curious how the answers would very, while I am attracted the same to men and women, because of religious reasons I am unwilling to date girls.

So basically you want things a very specific way, and all your way. Unless you're lucky enough to find a unicorn who shares the same desires as you to not have sex and to adopt, either you'd best not to bother with relationships or you'll need to compromise. Most men believe sex is non-negotiable in a relationship, so you might have to settle for being alone or adopting a few cats.


Or she could just be a single mom.

Well I personally think a loving mother and father are the most optimal people to raise a child. I think particularly for boys a positive male role model is very important, and denying them that is just selfish. There's a reason it takes a mother and father to produce offspring, and if people were more responsible we wouldn't see this epidemic of single parent households.


I disagree. I was raised by a single mother (My dad died when I was five) and I turned out fine.
The only ways it affected me is not really understanding men and finding relationships extra confusing.

Regardless, one mom is better than none.

So what part do you disagree with? I never said people raised by single parents can't turn out fine, my mum is a single mum too. What I said was two loving parents of opposite gender is better. Growing up, you get two perspectives to choose from instead of one, you get to learn about men and women and how they are to live with instead of just one gender and in my opinion you get a more balanced view of the world with both male and female perspectives and role models. Not to mention a single parent has to make choices that two parents don't. Spend time with the kids and live off a low income (you can't work when looking after children) or throw your kids in daycare and work, making your relationship more distant to the children. You can't be a single parent to young children and a worker and do both well.

My mum largely chose to be a stay-at-home mum, so while my brother and I were able to form a strong bond with her, money was frequently an issue because no one in the house was working. It was only by the grace of the government and welfare that we were receiving any income. I have a lazy eye and poor vision and I'm going to have it for the rest of my life now, but when I was a kid, I could have had surgery on it to get it fixed (the eye's matured well past that point now), but of course my mum was never going to be able to afford it, so instead now I'm stuck with it forever. I could also have had my crooked teeth straightened as a kid if there was money in my family, but of course that was never going to happen either, so now the responsibility is on me as an adult to pay for my own braces. Having two loving parents instead of one would have made a huge difference in my life.