Why do feminists say men are not entitled to SEX!?
Twilightprincess wrote:
The New Oxford American Dictionary defines feminism as "the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."...
"When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression." -- Clay Shirk, writer and teacher"Demands for equality for women are threats to men's self-esteem and sense of sexual turf." -- Alice S. Rossi, feminist and sociologist
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Twilightprincess wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Nobody is entitled to sex, but I have seen threads over the years on here where people were *assuming* that a guy had a sense of entitlement.
By the title of this thread and as a self-admitted incel, I suspect that entitlement may be a problem for the original poster.
It’d be handy if everyone with such traits would just put them in their usernames from the start. I’d imagine it’d save a lot of time and trouble for the mods.
I’m envisioning NaziGus, HomophobeJoe, and RacistSally...all gone in 5 minutes.
The OP aside, I was referring to a time a few years ago on here, where male posters who ranted about their struggles with dating were belittled by a series of troll users (who most of us on WP collectively refer to as "Katy"), who accused them of being, potentially, the next Elliott Rodgers, despite no evidence suggesting so.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Tim_Tex wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Nobody is entitled to sex, but I have seen threads over the years on here where people were *assuming* that a guy had a sense of entitlement.
By the title of this thread and as a self-admitted incel, I suspect that entitlement may be a problem for the original poster.
It’d be handy if everyone with such traits would just put them in their usernames from the start. I’d imagine it’d save a lot of time and trouble for the mods.
I’m envisioning NaziGus, HomophobeJoe, and RacistSally...all gone in 5 minutes.
The OP aside, I was referring to a time a few years ago on here, where male posters who ranted about their struggles with dating were belittled by a series of troll users (who most of us on WP collectively refer to as "Katy"), who accused them of being, potentially, the next Elliott Rodgers, despite no evidence suggesting so.
WP has also had a fair amount of incels who’ve made a brief appearance and then been banned.
Crazy people as well as those with complex problems do show up on online forums a lot.
On another forum, I frequently talked to conspiracy theorists. They were a hoot. One guy claimed that he read over 600 books on his topic (the Illuminati is behind everything, including the Enlightenment, so we need to reject everything from that era and after) so it must be true. I said that I could easily read over 600 books on the Loch Ness Monster, but that wouldn’t make it any more real. It was most likely an ineffective argument because he probably believes in the Loch Ness Monster.
Oh well. Some people just aren’t reasonable.
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
Twilightprincess wrote:
Crazy people as well as those with complex problems do show up on online forums a lot.
WP absolutely officially contains a large number of people with valid psychiatric diagnoses.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
magz wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
Crazy people as well as those with complex problems do show up on online forums a lot.
WP absolutely officially contains a large number of people with valid psychiatric diagnoses.
Right, I have my own fair share of mental health diagnoses.
Some people just want to troll or get attention even if it’s negative (which I’d view as crazy behavior) although those people probably have something like a personality disorder.
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
Fnord wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
The New Oxford American Dictionary defines feminism as "the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."...
"When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression." -- Clay Shirk, writer and teacher"Demands for equality for women are threats to men's self-esteem and sense of sexual turf." -- Alice S. Rossi, feminist and sociologist
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
Twilightprincess wrote:
The New Oxford American Dictionary defines feminism as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
The problem is: "Militant/Radical Feminism".
Quote:
Feminists treat men badly. It’s bad for feminism.
Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding.
Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.
This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life balance. What’s more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of feminism mix with hostility toward women.
Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding.
Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.
This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life balance. What’s more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of feminism mix with hostility toward women.
Many men flinch when they hear the term "Feminism" because of aspects of "Misandry" in our community.
Quote:
Misandry (/mɪˈsændri/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men or boys in general.[1][2][3] Misandry may be manifested in numerous ways, including social exclusion, sex discrimination, hostility, gynocentrism, matriarchy, belittling of men, violence against men, and sexual objectification. Such attitudes may be normalised culturally, such as through humour at the expense of men or boys, or blaming all world problems on “men”, or suggesting that men are redundant.
There is also the perceived connection between Feminism and weaponised Political Correctness,
And I have personally been in a work environment with a Misandrist who enjoyed keeping men under her heel through the perversion of PC.
There are many examples of misandry in the mainstream media these days.
"Man bashing" is seen everywhere, particularly in the sewers of public commentary such as "Twitter".
The irony is, misogyny has zero-tolerance whereas misandry, generally speaking, is "acceptable" overall.
It is not the case of you, the individual, bringing "Feminism" into focus,
It is the actions of the feminist extremists which make many men "Hand-Shy".
lostonearth35
Veteran
Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,884
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.
Pepe wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
The New Oxford American Dictionary defines feminism as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
The problem is: "Militant/Radical Feminism".
Quote:
Feminists treat men badly. It’s bad for feminism.
Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding.
Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.
This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life balance. What’s more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of feminism mix with hostility toward women.
Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding.
Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.
This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life balance. What’s more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of feminism mix with hostility toward women.
Many men flinch when they hear the term "Feminism" because of aspects of "Misandry" in our community.
Quote:
Misandry (/mɪˈsændri/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men or boys in general.[1][2][3] Misandry may be manifested in numerous ways, including social exclusion, sex discrimination, hostility, gynocentrism, matriarchy, belittling of men, violence against men, and sexual objectification. Such attitudes may be normalised culturally, such as through humour at the expense of men or boys, or blaming all world problems on “men”, or suggesting that men are redundant.
There is also the perceived connection between Feminism and weaponised Political Correctness,
And I have personally been in a work environment with a Misandrist who enjoyed keeping men under her heel through the perversion of PC.
There are many examples of misandry in the mainstream media these days.
"Man bashing" is seen everywhere, particularly in the sewers of public commentary such as "Twitter".
The irony is, misogyny has zero-tolerance whereas misandry, generally speaking, is "acceptable" overall.
It is not the case of you, the individual, bringing "Feminism" into focus,
It is the actions of the feminist extremists which make many men "Hand-Shy".
I was hoping to keep this conversation light and silly (personal flaws and all that) but alas...
I’ve experienced and observed much more misogyny than anything else and to an extreme degree, but I can’t speak for everyone else’s experience. I never said that I was in the mood for such a debate, especially given the past couple of days. I was, initially, just responding to an absurd and silly personal attack.
There are extremists in almost every facet of society. I avoid extremism in whatever facet it appears in.
Overall, I tend to like political correctness. Is it pushed too far? Sure.
The other day my dad complained because “you can’t make fun of fat people anymore.”
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
lostonearth35 wrote:
The OP sounds so totally dreamy, it's a wonder why he can't get a woman to sleep with him.
I'm a virgin female incel, but I know and understand why I'm not the kind of woman men are dying to sleep with.
I'm a virgin female incel, but I know and understand why I'm not the kind of woman men are dying to sleep with.
Apart from being an angry incel who likes to engage in personal attacks and likens his personal advances towards women to Sméagol from Lord of the Rings, I’m sure he’s absolutely dreamy.
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,203
Location: In my own little country
CockneyRebel wrote:
In the 60s and 70s, there was feminism. Today, there is man-hating. Having said that, I don't think that anybody's entitled to sex.
I’m a feminist, and I don’t hate men. Currently, my closest friends are men.
_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot
Twilightprincess wrote:
The New Oxford American Dictionary defines feminism as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
That’s how I would define it myself. There’s nothing inherently wrong with such a concept, and I’m puzzled as to why it riles people up on here. Many of my professors in college were and are feminists.
The problem with feminism based on the definition given here is that it presupposes that all inequality that exists between the sexes is faced by women. With this framework, any inequality faced by men is neglected.
lostonearth35
Veteran
Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,884
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.
