Anyone terrified of being alone for the rest of their life?
I lean towards being an "Omega Male" in not giving a hoot about social status, etc.
And I have a deep-rooted contempt for this toxic allistic social system we are forced to live in.
That provides personal strength and gives a greater perspective.
My philosophies change with my mood Lol I think it has more to do with inner conflicts. What I feel often conflicts, and what I know(fact based) and feel also conflict.
Will I be crucified, for being a sexist pig, for suggesting this may be a woman thing?
If so, pretend I didn't say it.
-I don't care that I don't fit in.
-I avoid people, so it is mutual.
-I have overcome negative internal thinking through metacognition identifying what has been going on subconsciously.
Yep.
The dominant life forms, on this planet, are NTs.
And as a result, they make the rulz.
That doesn't make them right.
NT social systems are horribly dysfunctional.
Moral of the story: Don't believe the NT bulldust.
Indeed, experience and age can make a difference. Then there are those that are on the spectrum that genuinely don't care about this kind of thing. They're fine by themselves and don't really care to interact with other people, much less have a partner. being that way certainly has advantages but it's not something that those that do have those desires can just will upon themselves to be like.
I'm glad meta-cognition works so well for you, I use it a lot myself. Because I do though, I also know that mental/rational understanding doesn't necessarily 'fix' a hurt emotional center. It's a good place to start, but there is a lot of work to be done in order to become cohesive.
Humans are imperfect whether they are NT or ND. So there is always going to be some manner of dysfunction. Meaning even if the ND ran the world, there would still be a boat load of dysfunction - just a bit different.
If you avoid toxic people and situations, where you can, that helps a hell of a lot also.
The crux of the solution in overcoming the fear of being alone may lie in self-esteem.
Well, I think it may be a bloody good start.
I'm not entirely sure what you would include within social indoctrination. In terms of just the general everyday social messages were given and taught as to what is normal or are you including trauma based situations? Abuse, neglect, abandonment etc. "I am scared of being alone" that comes from those kinds of things is a bit different than "I am scared of being alone" because of "I don't fit in/I'm different". Then of course if both are active it's an even heavier weight. But if you're including both, that's a bit like suggesting we all learn to be islands. Typically, but not always people need other people in some way.
I'm not against the idea of learning to decouple ones self worth from others approval. But a complete decoupling I don't think is something most can do. At least not without walling themselves up and off. We just need to be more choosy about whom we allow to affect our mental/emotional well being. <---but this also requires learning to value ourselves more
So yes, in terms of overcoming the fear/terror of being alone does have a substantial hinge on one's self worth regardless if someone is ND or NT, everyone should be learn to be able to be okay alone.
Getting over that terror doesn't necessarily mean someone is going to be happy about it. If someone has a dream of sharing their life with someone or having a family and despite their best efforts they are unable to make progress, being alone will always likely remain a difficult prospect.
In psychology, the term self-esteem is used to describe a person's overall sense of self-worth or personal value. In other words, how much you appreciate and like yourself. It involves a variety of beliefs about yourself, such as the appraisal of your own appearance, beliefs, emotions, and behaviors. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-se ... em-2795868
I like who I am.
Do you?
I barely know you
For myself, there's things I like and there are things I don't. I think that's fairly normal though.
If so, pretend I didn't say it.
If your pretense for saying so is because of something like 'women are so emotional' then yes, it is indeed sexist.
_________________
"Inside the heart of each and every one of us there is a longing to be understood by someone who really cares. When a person is understood, he or she can put up with almost anything in the world."
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
I lean towards being an "Omega Male" in not giving a hoot about social status, etc.
And I have a deep-rooted contempt for this toxic allistic social system we are forced to live in.
That provides personal strength and gives a greater perspective.
My philosophies change with my mood Lol I think it has more to do with inner conflicts. What I feel often conflicts, and what I know(fact based) and feel also conflict.
Will I be crucified, for being a sexist pig, for suggesting this may be a woman thing?
If so, pretend I didn't say it.
Hush!
If so, pretend I didn't say it.
If your pretense for saying so is because of something like 'women are so emotional' then yes, it is indeed sexist.
This was a joke.
I suspect you knew that.
Indeed, experience and age can make a difference. Then there are those that are on the spectrum that genuinely don't care about this kind of thing. They're fine by themselves and don't really care to interact with other people, much less have a partner. being that way certainly has advantages but it's not something that those that do have those desires can just will upon themselves to be like.
Maybe not "will upon themselves", but studies/surveys/research has identified a trend of well being, over a certain age.
You are only 33, so you have a ways to go.
I'm glad meta-cognition works so well for you, I use it a lot myself. Because I do though, I also know that mental/rational understanding doesn't necessarily 'fix' a hurt emotional center. It's a good place to start, but there is a lot of work to be done in order to become cohesive.
Assumptions:
Negative internal dialogue exists.
Negative internal dialogue affects our emotions.
Consider:
Where did this negative conditioning come from?
How did it take root?
If negative programming is possible,
Can positive programming replace it?
Is it not axiomatic that it can?
Yes, it takes a lot of work.
That is not the same as an impossibility.
Not everyone engages in metacognition.
Those who do can reap the benefits of greater self-awareness more effectively, surely.
I lean towards being an "Omega Male" in not giving a hoot about social status, etc.
And I have a deep-rooted contempt for this toxic allistic social system we are forced to live in.
That provides personal strength and gives a greater perspective.
My philosophies change with my mood Lol I think it has more to do with inner conflicts. What I feel often conflicts, and what I know(fact based) and feel also conflict.
Will I be crucified, for being a sexist pig, for suggesting this may be a woman thing?
If so, pretend I didn't say it.
Hush!
"There is a 20-year gaol sentence for disagreeing with a woman."
That sounds about right.
WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,214
Location: California, United States
this reminds me, i've seen and heard discussions on this, when i've been told of stories of guys, men, reaching a certain age and never had a girlfriend before, and when they disclose that to the woman they are speaking to, the woman will often react by saying "why haven't you had a girlfriend?", or "i find it hard to believe that he's never had a girlfriend before"
I've seen women make posts like this on the internet when asking dating advice when discussing a potential dating prospect, like saying "should i pursue him if he's never had a girlfriend before?" or "why hasn't he had a girlfriend before"?
i get mad, enraged, when women make comments or express shock when they meet a certain guy and the guy has never had a girlfriend before.
Because it makes me want to say to those women "ya well, the game is different for men than it is for women", or "you don't know what the dating game or system is like for us guys, men".
Because is a brutal cold harsh reminder, that a guy can be handsome or good-looking or have a lot going for him, but his social-skills are below average or kinda awkward, or just not that much of a social person, that is obviously going to affect mens dating lives a lot more than the other way around.
Since guys are expected to do the heavy-lifting in social-interactions between men and women.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,217
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Not all autistic males are alone. I currently have an autistic male partner (in addition to being autistic myself).
But, yes, it's hard for most autistic people (especially for autistic heterosexual men, apparently, but also for many autistic women as well) to find partners.
Your chances are better if you can first get your life together on other fronts, e.g. if you can manage to get a decent-paying job. This is more difficult for autistic people too. Some of us can, some of us can't.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Only in the early phases of the relationship. Once a relationship is established, women are more likely to do most of the emotional labor.
I should also point out that the current social norm of expecting men be the only ones to take the initiative in establishing a heterosexual relationship is harmful to (hetero and bisexual) women as well as harmful to men. It can be extremely frustrating to feel that one is not allowed, at all, to approach a man that one is interested in, lest one be seen as a "slut" or otherwise a woman of low value.
But this problem could be fixable, IF enough people, both women and men, were to decide to get together and fix it. How would you feel about a "Sadie Hawkins club" in which everyone agrees that it's fine for women to take the initiative?
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Last edited by Mona Pereth on 26 Feb 2021, 7:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
Hear! Hear!
To the lonely heterosexual men here: Consider the above.
Just don't go PM'ing random women here on WP. Don't PM anyone here until after you've had plenty of interaction with them in multiple sub-forums.
Also it would be helpful to include your approximate location in your profile. To protect your privacy, don't be too specific about your location, but do at least say which country you are in, and, if it's a big country, say which state/province or major metropolitan area you are in.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,214
Location: California, United States
Only in the early phases of the relationship. Once a relationship is established, women are more likely to do most of the emotional labor.
I should also point out that the current social norm of expecting men be the only ones to take the initiative in establishing a heterosexual relationship is harmful to (hetero and bisexual) women as well as harmful to men. It can be extremely frustrating to feel that one is not allowed, at all, to approach a man that one is interested in, lest one be seen as a "slut" or otherwise a woman of low value.
But this problem could be fixable, IF enough people, both women and men, were to decide to get together and fix it. How would you feel about a "Sadie Hawkins club" in which everyone agrees that it's fine for women to take the initiative?
yes but starting the relationship is still a major phase or significant step, a relationship can't happen or start if that phase doesn't occur, and there is still no denying the fact, that despite how modern human society has become or ow modern the world has become, it's still rare for a woman to make the first move or ask a guy out first, or be the one to initiate the relationship.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Hear! Hear!
To the lonely heterosexual men here: Consider the above.
Just don't go PM'ing random women here on WP. Don't PM anyone here until after you've had plenty of interaction with them in multiple sub-forums.
Also it would be helpful to include your approximate location in your profile. To protect your privacy, don't be too specific about your location, but do at least say which country you are in, and, if it's a big country, say which state/province or major metropolitan area you are in.
I PM no one; I just reply.
I may PM only guys to discuss some thread but I never initiate PM with women* here.
I did it maybe once only ages ago; with no ulterior motif (i live on the other side of the planet for fk sake); about something that has nothing to do with romance or sex.
and yet she thought I am interested; never again ever since.
Edit: I just remembered I did with one user recently, shared a youtube video - but she’s someone who pmed me few times before; but it’s all platonic, both ways.
