Why are men threatened by a high body count compared to..?

Page 4 of 15 [ 236 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next

rse92
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Oct 2021
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,228
Location: Buffalo, NY

09 Jun 2022, 10:57 am

Fnord wrote:
rse92 wrote:
It may be. However, would you kindly tell me what the straw man arguments were that I made?
Actually, strawmen . . .
rse92 wrote:
Men who easily convince (or are invited by) women to sleep with them are almost certainly:

Attractive and healthy
Maybe loaded
If not attractive and healthy, definitely loaded
Has an easy charm with women (and probably men too; women like men who other men like)
Doesn't make any pretense of this being a long term matter
Takes no for an answer and moves on


I think you are a bright guy. However, you do not know what a straw man argument is.



rse92
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Oct 2021
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,228
Location: Buffalo, NY

09 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

Fnord wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Oh come on Fnord, even you can’t deny that a man has to be very attractive and successful in order to bed a lot of women; the other way around is not necessarily true.  It’s the truth.
Not always . . . there are enough exceptions to poke a few holes in the blanket, metaphorically speaking.  The sitcom trope of a middle-class doofus married to a hottie who could have any other man she wanted may be more realistic that you think.


And that is grounded in fact and not your opinion, right?



Where_am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,392
Location: London

09 Jun 2022, 11:08 am

Image


_________________
"A loaded gun won't set you free. So you say." - Ian Curtis


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

09 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

rse92 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Oh come on Fnord, even you can’t deny that a man has to be very attractive and successful in order to bed a lot of women; the other way around is not necessarily true.  It’s the truth.
Not always . . . there are enough exceptions to poke a few holes in the blanket, metaphorically speaking.  The sitcom trope of a middle-class doofus married to a hottie who could have any other man she wanted may be more realistic that you think.
And that is grounded in fact and not your opinion, right?
Of Course!  More fodder for the old compost heap!  Opinion are cheap; real knowledge has value.



ironpony
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Nov 2015
Age: 40
Posts: 5,590
Location: canada

09 Jun 2022, 1:30 pm

Well as far as more men being threatened at the idea of a woman cheating if she has a high count, but more women not being bothered by a high count in men, is there evidence to suggest that more guys with a high count can stay faithful more often, in comparison?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

09 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm

A smart man never questions a woman about her past.

A smart woman never mentions it.



rse92
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Oct 2021
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,228
Location: Buffalo, NY

09 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm

ironpony wrote:
Well as far as more men being threatened at the idea of a woman cheating if she has a high count, but more women not being bothered by a high count in men, is there evidence to suggest that more guys with a high count can stay faithful more often, in comparison?


Why do you believe the bolded statement is true, and again why do you use the word "threat".

To me, neither a man nor a woman who sleeps with a promiscuous partner can reasonably expect faithfulness, and I expect they generally don't. Like a scorpion, it's in the promiscuous partner's nature.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

09 Jun 2022, 5:10 pm

ironpony wrote:
Well as far as more men being threatened at the idea of a woman cheating if she has a high count, but more women not being bothered by a high count in men, is there evidence to suggest that more guys with a high count can stay faithful more often, in comparison?


I think there are gender differences toward body count. Women naturally are drawn toward successful men so in that algorithm they become more tolerant toward the male's previous high body count based on how well the man can provide for them and the higher their social status.



ironpony
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Nov 2015
Age: 40
Posts: 5,590
Location: canada

09 Jun 2022, 10:30 pm

That makes sense. But are the women turned off of the high body count but tolerate it for the other advantages, or are they actually turned on by the high body count, because that means the man is successful?



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jun 2022, 11:06 pm

STD wise, they would be both a threat.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

10 Jun 2022, 2:51 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
STD wise, they would be both a threat.


You've heard of prenuptials. there's something called a sexual health check certificate.
Gold-diggers think of everything :lol:



MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

10 Jun 2022, 5:06 am

ironpony wrote:
That makes sense. But are the women turned off of the high body count but tolerate it for the other advantages, or are they actually turned on by the high body count, because that means the man is successful?

There may be some truth to this. The second person I had sex with was probably attracted to me, to some extent, because I had been her school chum's sex partner. A man with an impressive track record can be assumed to have proven his ability to satisfy women. Don't forget, cis gender women who aren't actually on the ace spectrum are horny even if they won't admit to it.


_________________
My WP story


MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

10 Jun 2022, 5:11 am

Given that this thread was supposed to be about women with a high body count, I answered this before, but was ignored. The reason such women intimidate men is because most men assume those women have been with other men who are better lays than they are.


_________________
My WP story


ironpony
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Nov 2015
Age: 40
Posts: 5,590
Location: canada

10 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

MaxE wrote:
Given that this thread was supposed to be about women with a high body count, I answered this before, but was ignored. The reason such women intimidate men is because most men assume those women have been with other men who are better lays than they are.


Oh sorry I didn't mean to ignore you or anyone, just more responses came in than I anticipated. But if most guys assume this about other guys, when I ask my women friends about it they say things like 'since when do guys care about the woman's pleasure', and things like that. So are a lot of guys selfish and don't care, if that's correct, but therefore, would they still care about a woman's past then?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

10 Jun 2022, 11:00 am

I wouldn’t give two craps….if I fall madly in love with her.

If I’m not a “better lay” than some other guy, I would try to make myself that “better lay.”



MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

10 Jun 2022, 11:50 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I wouldn’t give two craps….if I fall madly in love with her.

If I’m not a “better lay” than some other guy, I would try to make myself that “better lay.”

This has to do with physical endowment not skill or attitude.

I am talking about what goes on in a guy's head. Most guys wouldn't want to be humiliated on taking their pants off or after attempting to have sex with a woman who may have a lot of past experiences for comparison.


_________________
My WP story