AlexanderDantes wrote:
Perhaps it's not like that in a developing country like Australia as some men made their fortune taking advantage of an emerging economy and rising house prices but that's just an example.
A developing country? That sounds like we're a 3rd world country.

I am Australian, and let me tell you, being Australian is a great thing to be.
(We even have running water and paved roads and stuff like that. My house has doors! My bedroom doesn't, though. It did, but it kept falling off its runners and onto my head, so I replaced it with a sheet tied across the doorway.)
....
Now I will try being serious.
Unfortunately, it is just like that in Australia.
AlexanderDantes wrote:
Who am I, I have noticed that when everything fits perfectly into their perspective or definitions, people are less judgemental. If you are a doctor and you have a big house, nobody questions why but if you are a working class person with a big house, people question why because it distorts the perspectives that they hold inside. In other words, many people try to put everything into boxes because it defines their world and they think it gives them freedom but it is really the way to imprisonment of the mind.
Yeah, I have noticed that. I think that not fitting into a box is one way to questioning the assumptions that society makes about people and their roles, and society's tendency to say "If you are x, then you are also y".
I think that associating with people who don't fit into those boxes is another way of realising that people are far more complex than the stereotypes that people use to navigate the world, and that once you see how limiting and harmful the stereotypes can be, the more inclined you are to question them. It probably works the other way, too: if stereotypes work in your favour, you are less likely to question them.
I've also noticed that people are more prone to putting people into boxes if they are in an outgroup relative to them: for example, men vs women, rich vs poor, white vs black, etc. Being friends or associating in some way with people from the outgroup, I find, helps people to realise that they are people who are just as complex as themselves, and that the boxes that people put them in are limiting and really very silly: for example, I have brothers and male friends, so I'm not inclined to come out with nonsense like "boys shouldn't cry" or "men are pigs" (apart from that one time, but to be fair, my little brother had just eaten an entire packet of biscuits in one day), and my brothers have female friends, so they don't come out with stuff like "women can't do x" or "women belong in the kitchen". Similarly, I'm poor, my parents are/were poor, but since I went to university, I've mixed with people who were far more well-off than me, whereas my father associated mainly with working-class people, so he was more likely than me to see all rich people as evil, grasping and greedy. We had heated debates about it.
If people could be encouraged to get to know people who are different than they are, I think it would benefit society greatly, but it would be a massive and difficult undertaking. It would be worth it if it could be done and if enough people supported it.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I