11 Feb 2011, 10:18 am
11 Feb 2011, 10:25 am
wefunction wrote:
Lonermutant wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
Lonermutant wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
Lonermutant wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
Hey, this troll is back. Long time no see, Lonertroll.
If a man asks his date/prospective girlfriend when they are going to have sex, it's pretty obvious that he's not interested in her as a girlfriend, but as a sex toy.
Not at all. Nearly all relationships involve sex, and if your partner shows aversion to it, you may ask about the subject to see if there are any problems with need to be addressed.
The problem is that he obviously tried to get her into bed.
Prove it.
Quote: "He told me he's interested in me as a person, and also interested in my body. But the very week we officially started "dating," he brought up the topic of when we were going to have sex."
She should have ridiculed the moron in public.
The only saving grace about trolls is that sometimes they provide a vehicle for discussing angles of a topic that wouldn't otherwise be discussed by people with common sense. Sometimes it's good to get those common sense statements out there that a lot of us take for granted.
I would feel that a man wasn't interested in me if I didn't sense any physical desire from him in addition to intellectual interest. That's for someone that I just met and started dating. The OP's situation is different. Considering they have known each other for years, it is like he has "time served" for waiting for sex. He has an established comfort level with her from years of friendship, so not only does he feel that he can talk to her about anything but it seems okay to discuss "the next level" within the first week. He wants things to move forward and wants her to know that he wants her. There's nothing wrong with that. The discussion that has to be made clear is the one about her asexuality. What happens from there is significant to whether or not they can continue as a couple. We know it's possible for a couple to have a health and happy relationship involving asexuality but this is crucial to the individuals involved in the relationship. Their success will be dependent on whether or not they are right for each other, even with years of friendship beneath them.
11 Feb 2011, 10:26 am
a goldstar for wefuction. 
11 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
11 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
Lonermutant wrote:
He still seems creepy to me.
well then, don't date him.
11 Feb 2011, 2:10 pm
Lonermutant wrote:
He still seems creepy to me.
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
11 Feb 2011, 3:19 pm
Pandora_Box wrote:
I'm going out on a limb and on ASP-Z side this time around. I didn't see his original comment as rude or insulting you one bit. Nor did I see it as some kind of form of "ignorant" statement. I too would make a comment, not because I'm ignorant or dumb or whatever, but because it is a funny word. Are we no longer allowed to point out funny words?
I think the person who started not so polite comments was yourself. I saw nothing wrong with Asp-z post.?
I think the person who started not so polite comments was yourself. I saw nothing wrong with Asp-z post.?
Most non-heterosexuals would be reasonable to assume that when someone says, of their orientation "sounds like you just strung a bunch of words together", and "that sounds stupid" that said person is taking a jab at their orientation, not reading words aloud to themselves, lulzing, and then making a forum post about the lulzing.
Forgive me for thinking this was likely the case.
11 Feb 2011, 4:49 pm
Bethie wrote:
Pandora_Box wrote:
I'm going out on a limb and on ASP-Z side this time around. I didn't see his original comment as rude or insulting you one bit. Nor did I see it as some kind of form of "ignorant" statement. I too would make a comment, not because I'm ignorant or dumb or whatever, but because it is a funny word. Are we no longer allowed to point out funny words?
I think the person who started not so polite comments was yourself. I saw nothing wrong with Asp-z post.?
I think the person who started not so polite comments was yourself. I saw nothing wrong with Asp-z post.?
Most non-heterosexuals would be reasonable to assume that when someone says, of their orientation "sounds like you just strung a bunch of words together", and "that sounds stupid" that said person is taking a jab at their orientation, not reading words aloud to themselves, lulzing, and then making a forum post about the lulzing.
Forgive me for thinking this was likely the case.
Dunno where you got this idea from. I made a comment on the wording, not the orientation.
11 Feb 2011, 10:37 pm
12 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
12 Feb 2011, 8:05 am
At least Wombat is being honest when he considers over 100 years ago to be "the good ol' days". Men usually stop at the 1950's. Ahhh... remember the days when if a woman didn't get married she had no value and was scorned by society as "an old maid"? Wasn't that a sweet time?
Wombat wrote:
Can you imagine Pollyanna or Ann of Green Gables having it off with half the boys in town before they choose the one they like best?
By the way, it's Anne with an "e".
13 Feb 2011, 2:09 am
13 Feb 2011, 11:39 am
14 Feb 2011, 1:07 am
wefunction wrote:
Wombat wrote:
wefunction wrote:
By the way, it's Anne with an "e".
No it isn't. In the books she wanted it to be Anne with an e and was annoyed that her name was plain old "Ann".
Dear god, you're really trying to argue Anne of Green Gables with me?! When her first suggestion of Cordelia was refused, she spelled Anne with an "e" and insisted that it be spelled with an "e". The title of the books are with an "e". Her name is spelled with an "e" throughout the books. Would like to quarrel about Pippie Long Stocking or Nancy Drew next?
I haven't read the books in many years. I bow to your superior knowledge and offer my most humble apologies.
14 Feb 2011, 8:24 am
Wombat wrote:
wefunction wrote:
Wombat wrote:
wefunction wrote:
By the way, it's Anne with an "e".
No it isn't. In the books she wanted it to be Anne with an e and was annoyed that her name was plain old "Ann".
Dear god, you're really trying to argue Anne of Green Gables with me?! When her first suggestion of Cordelia was refused, she spelled Anne with an "e" and insisted that it be spelled with an "e". The title of the books are with an "e". Her name is spelled with an "e" throughout the books. Would like to quarrel about Pippie Long Stocking or Nancy Drew next?
I haven't read the books in many years. I bow to your superior knowledge and offer my most humble apologies.
It was a childhood favorite of mine and I just read these again with my daughter.
15 Feb 2011, 12:29 am
wefunction wrote:
It was a childhood favorite of mine and I just read these again with my daughter.
Ahh... a lover of classic children's literature.
Go to http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/
There you will find all the classic tales from the 19th century.
For example did you know that there about 15 Oz books?
I especially recommend the works of Edith Nesbit who wrote "The Secret Garden" and "The Railway Children".
Try Kipling's "The Brushwood Boy" or read all the novels of Edgar Rice Burroughs.
Enjoy.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Dating supposed to be easier today why are there more single |
19 Aug 2026, 5:51 pm |
| Is it easy to control than out of your control with dating? |
19 Aug 2026, 8:17 pm |
