Encountered a pair of Pick-Up Artists last night.
Not for me to be a fence sitter, but I think all three of you have a point. It takes all kinds. To say a woman is this or that or the other - it's just too simplistic.
People have varying amounts of will in different situations. And are a mix of desires, and internal battles. I'm sorry if I'm insulting anyone by stating the obvious.
When it comes down to it - we weren't there.
and have been a female a lot longer than you so have experienced all manner of things and have observed all manner or things.
When's Boo had the operation? Eh? I must have missed that

Agreed, good post.
Last edited by octobertiger on 01 Nov 2013, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Shatbat
Veteran

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet
I don't see anything particularly shallow about accepting advances from someone I like, and rejecting them from someone I don't. It's just called having preferences. I'm pretty sure women exist who only accept advances from hot guys. Good for them. But the majority of women I know only accept advances from men they like and trust. What do you suggest they should do, sleep with everyone who asks them to even if they don't like them and would end up the opposite of enjoying it?
Also, you are falling into the fundamental attribution bias, putting too much emphasis on someone's intrinsic characteristics, and too little on their surrounding situations. Situations can be very powerful, and controlling the situation gives a lot of power over the people who are in it.
Also, Shau, don't give up. The reasons someone might have to slow down physical intimacy are not necessarily bad ones. How much do you trust each other? What's the most intimate you two have been? What are the reasons she gives you?
_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill
Last edited by Shatbat on 01 Nov 2013, 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Can you explain?
That's how Kjas and Leafplant are describing women: spineless, blinds and victims of their own instincts and of society that raised to be like this.
While I was saying that this woman chose, with full awarness, to be seduced by this guy and she chose to make out with him, otherwise her reaction would be totally different.
I am saying that women are humans with will and brains like men, while them are saying they are creatures with no will. It's ironic, but read their posts again, that's what they are saying.
As difficult as it is not to speak in generalisations, it causes all manner of problems.
Re: bold bit. We cannot make that call - we weren't there. I have been alive a lot longer than you and have been a female a lot longer than you so have experienced all manner of things and have observed all manner or things.
People are complicated and the society expectations don't help. Of course women have will - but the society by and large demands that they never openly display their will in a sexually explicit way (lest they be labelled whores).
You are talking contradictions.
First you say that the girl who pushes away players trying to kiss her and put their hands on her would be viewed by others (WHO are those others, Kjas didn't answer that) as a rude and bitchy, then you say that society would quickly label a girl as whore if she openly displays her will in sexual manner.
You are talking contradictions.
First you say that the girl who pushes away players trying to kiss her and put their hands on her would be viewed by others (WHO are those others, Kjas didn't answer that) as a rude and bitchy, then you say that society would quickly label a girl as whore if she openly displays her will in sexual manner.
How is that a contradiction??
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Also, you are falling into the fundamental attribution bias, putting too much emphasis on someone's intrinsic characteristics, and too little on their surrounding situations. Situations can be very powerful, and controlling the situation gives a lot of power over the people who are in it.
Also, Shau, don't give up. The reasons someone might have to slow down physical intimacy are not necessarily bad ones. How much do you trust each other? What's the most intimate you two have been? What are the reasons she gives you?
I think you people are putting words in Stalk's mouth, he didn't say that girls must sleep with everyone doing advances.
And we are not talking about normal advances, we are talking about sexual touching and kissing by a guy who's still basically a stranger, those are harrassements. Harrassement shouldn't become less harrassement if the guy happens to be hot.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
You are talking contradictions.
First you say that the girl who pushes away players trying to kiss her and put their hands on her would be viewed by others (WHO are those others, Kjas didn't answer that) as a rude and bitchy, then you say that society would quickly label a girl as whore if she openly displays her will in sexual manner.
How is that a contradiction??
It's a contradiction in what you claim that society expects from how a girl should behave; first you claim that society expects her to be very nice and passive to such sexual advances otherwise she would be labeled as rude then you say that society expects her to not display sexual desires because society would call her a whore.
But passively letting stranger guys kissing and touching her would be seen as an act of sexual display!
It's the second expectation which really exists, while the first one is porn.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
People have varying amounts of will in different situations. And are a mix of desires, and internal battles. I'm sorry if I'm insulting anyone by stating the obvious.
When it comes down to it - we weren't there.
and have been a female a lot longer than you so have experienced all manner of things and have observed all manner or things.
When's Boo had the operation? Eh? I must have missed that

Agreed, good post.
Check my profile, Tiger. Teehee.
You are talking contradictions.
First you say that the girl who pushes away players trying to kiss her and put their hands on her would be viewed by others (WHO are those others, Kjas didn't answer that) as a rude and bitchy, then you say that society would quickly label a girl as whore if she openly displays her will in sexual manner.
How is that a contradiction??
It's a contradiction in what you claim that society expects from how a girl should behave; first you claim that society expects her to be very nice and passive to such sexual advances otherwise she would be labeled as rude then you say that society expects her to not display sexual desires because society would call her a whore.
But passively letting stranger guys kissing and touching her would be seen as an act of sexual display!
It's the second expectation which really exists, while the first one is porn.
Um. I sort of see where you are coming from. You can't just let people touch you up just coz they feel like it obviously, but as Shatbat said
Shatbat
Veteran

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet
And we are not talking about normal advances, we are talking about sexual touching and kissing by a guy who's still basically a stranger, those are harrassements. Harrassement shouldn't become less harrassement if the guy happens to be hot.
He didn't say so, but it was one possible logical outcome of the original statement. If there is something wrong with women being selective then to make it right they should stop being selective, which means they either sleep with everyone or with no-one. Neither of those two are desirable options, therefore selectiveness is a good thing.
I'd say harassment would depend on whether the advances are welcome or not, instead of whether the other person is a stranger or not. Friends can harass (or worse) and strangers can be welcome. If a hot guy is on average more welcome in that kind of situation that a non-hot one, well, that almost goes right in hand with the definition of hotness, and is a fact of life. Kissing and touching is not sex, someone willing to do the first two may not be willing to do the latter. And again, sometimes those advances may not be completely welcome, but the situation becomes too overwhelming to fight.
_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
And we are not talking about normal advances, we are talking about sexual touching and kissing by a guy who's still basically a stranger, those are harrassements. Harrassement shouldn't become less harrassement if the guy happens to be hot.
He didn't say so, but it was one possible logical outcome of the original statement. If there is something wrong with women being selective then to make it right they should stop being selective, which means they either sleep with everyone or with no-one. Neither of those two are desirable options, therefore selectiveness is a good thing.
I'd say harassment would depend on whether the advances are welcome or not, instead of whether the other person is a stranger or not. Friends can harass (or worse) and strangers can be welcome. If a hot guy is on average more welcome in that kind of situation that a non-hot one, well, that almost goes right in hand with the definition of hotness, and is a fact of life. Kissing and touching is not sex, someone willing to do the first two may not be willing to do the latter. And again, sometimes those advances may not be completely welcome, but the situation becomes too overwhelming to fight.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBVuAGFcGKY[/youtube]
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Shatbat
Veteran

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet
This video contains content from NBC Universal, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.
---------------------------------------
Sorry about that
Guess you'll have to explain my your point by writing then
_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill
Shatbat
Veteran

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet
Nevermind, googled it
Eh, the women in the video might have been shallow, but they still have a right of self-ownership, and are neither obligated to date the unattractive one, nor not date the attractive one. And it was an exaggeration, anyway.
Anyway, now that I think about it I don't see how stating that women are shallow is relevant to the current discussion. Your main point seems to be: if women can't say no easily then they are either spineless or actually wanted it. We've been proposing an alternate explanation, that societal pressures and the strength of the situation can influence a woman's behaviour very strongly (and a man's too, for the sake of completeness). There are plenty of psychological studies and psychological literature that support this theory, plus the anecdotal evidence (I don't see what some people have against it, it is pretty useful) and logical reasoning of several people here. So what do you have to say about it?
_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The only situation I can see in Shau's story that the woman got turned on by this guy.
and she went for him.
So if your gf cheats on you and then tells you "sorry he was so smooth talker and the situation and ambiance made me to sit on his lap and my hand in his pants" would that make the cheat ok?
Leafplant claims that society is responsible for that, do American parents applause if some someone kisses forcefully their daughter and touches her boobs in front of them and would they punish her and call her rude if she slaps him? I think not.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Woman loses nose and now has seven noses to pick from |
29 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm |
Big green night vision |
09 May 2025, 7:27 am |