Not all virgins are ugly misogynist clueless idiots.
I believe it's more about "a man's view of his own masculinity" than it is about the "lack of sex."
I, myself, don't view a virgin as being "less masculine" than a non-virgin--especially if he is a good person who has pride in himself. If he takes care of his business in a virtuous way. If he treats people like he wants to be treated.
Some of the most idiotic people have had sex before; some of the most sublime people are virgins.
Immediately after I lost my virginity, I asked myself? What has it done for me? In retrospect, the act of sex itself did nothing to enhance me. And it certainly did not enable me to have an actual relationship with my "first."
A few points could be made here:
1) Not every mention is a complaint.
2) Hasty generalizations about what is obvious enough to be redundant usually miss contexts you didn't bother to think of, and sometimes one of those is actually the original context the phrase was taken out of.
3) When there are several ways to interpret what someone says, only one of which doesn't make them look like a complete moron, that's usually the most productive interpretation.
4) "Being X and not by choice" can mean simply "being X, and not because of a specific choice to be X", regardless of other possible choices made.
5) Analogies have limitations.
6) Cats have rough tongues.
7) I'm tired.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
1) Not every mention is a complaint.
2) Hasty generalizations about what is obvious enough to be redundant usually miss contexts you didn't bother to think of, and sometimes one of those is actually the original context the phrase was taken out of.
3) When there are several ways to interpret what someone says, only one of which doesn't make them look like a complete moron, that's usually the most productive interpretation.
4) "Being X and not by choice" can mean simply "being X, and not because of a specific choice to be X", regardless of other possible choices made.
5) Analogies have limitations.
6) Cats have rough tongues.
7) I'm tired.
Heehee. I like #6
_________________
"When does the human cost become too high for the building of a better machine?"
Well, that's the sad reality of it-- they don't understand that negative attitudes are a complete non-starter in the dating game. They try, they fail, they become negative, they try again, become more negative. It's a very very bad cycle. At some point the negative thoughts get directed at women since they see women as the obstacle not their own presentation to women.
Imho sir, a lot of people here did start-off positive, and then failed, and then became positive again, but still failed, etc.
I believe happiness and positive thinking is just extremely elusive, but I guess that's just life.
Nearly every possible piece of positive, uplifting advice given here and in real life can be countered. It's all also usually pointless, useless, unhelpful little anecdotes and idioms that have no sort of reflection on real-life.
It can take 5 minutes to think of a positive argument, but 5 seconds to counter it.
E.g: Positive: "Why not join clubs/groups in your area?" Counter: "There is none for my hobbies/interests, unfortunately." Positive: "Why not ask friends to help set-you-up or meet someone new?" Counter: "Most of my friends are male and all in the same boat as me. The people I meet through family I'm usually not compatible with" Positive: "Why not try online dating?" Counter: "I alreayd have been." Positive: "Why not therapy/psychologist to help you overcome anxiety/depression/insert issue here." Counter: "I already have been for x years."
Maybe it's because negative thinking is more in touch with reality and there is more evidence of failure than success. You could give yourself daily 'pep-talks' to try and feel better and always feel positive, but then once you think of a negative counter, you realize that is the reality.
"I am a perfectly fine person, am capable of love, and capable of being loved" says the 40 year old never had a relationship man. "Oh wait...I've been searching since 15 and still haven't found any success." The first thing might be true, or might not, but even if it's true, he's got no proof except for family and friends, people incapable of loving him or being interested in that way, say he is.
I'm not taking about the pressures of virginity either but building emotional connections like you say. Surprisingly as a teenager I've experienced no sort of negative outcomes or pressure due to being a virgin and frankly I don't give a damn if I am. I have no cultural views of virginity and to me it makes no difference.
I'm not disagreeing with what you say. I perfectly do agree. I'm just arguing it's a little understandable - misogynistic, hateful attitude? No. Whiney, crybaby attitude? Well, yes.
Does it justify the attitude, especially among adults? Not at all.
But I think even those who do have that 'just get back up and keep going' attitude and remain dedicated no matter what adversity stands in their way, also have their low points. There comes a time where everything's jsut so wrong in your life, all you can do is breakdown and cry or in this case, whine and victimise yourself of the 'big bad' scary world. I call this 'rock bottom' and usually most people should pick themselves up again as soon as possible and quit the whiny, failure attitude, but that doesn't mean you won't end up there again.
I see all the negativity and self-depreciation here not in a cruel way.
These people aren't losers or failures, they're depressed people, people at 'rock bottom'. Those with the hateful mindset are the absolute extremists.
Many people here complaining about a lack of success in love and dating may also have difficulty in other areas of their life - e.g. Sly mentions how he was in debt, has a degree for a job he can't do, a low income job, along with loneliness on top of it. Ecomatt mentions loneliness, difficulty making friends, speech difficulties and the discrimination he may recieve for his hearing difficulties, etc.
I think there's two points to make:
1. Most people here who have never been in a relationship think it's the answer to their problems, when usually it won't be. It's because they've never been in one that they can't say they don't know if it is or not.
Heck, even I still have this mindset after being in a relationship. One of my only major problems is loneliness, and anxiety.
The anxiety thing I've got covered and working on. I can be confident now in many situations and can pass as quite normal a lot of the time.
Now, the loneliness thing, a relationship CAN solve that. Friendship, a relationship, or both. I am seeking both simultaneously.
There's no way to really argue against this. You could say I should learn to enjoy independence/solitude, but not only do I already enjoy independence, but it's more like 'been there, done that, don't like it" when it comes to spending large amounts of time alone.
The only way to solve lack of human contact is just that - human contact. I'm sure the other users here also have this mindset but some may believe it will solve other issues other than loneliness even though it will not.
2. I just don't think using an escort will always be the be all, end all answer to these people and their issues. It's so much more complicated than that imho.
Yeah it doesn't help with loneliness.
I had a friend who managed to lose his "virginity" on his own, he was doing a hand-speed contest with another friend and ended up breaking it, lol. The other guy told me, it's not like I was participating or even watching.
I understand it's hard seeing all of one's peers bragging about their sex life and putting down those without one, but you'll find that's just a temporary stage people go through and chances are the people bragging probably aren't going to be your friends in five years anyhow, so why blow a gasket over someone so insignificant?
The other thing I think going on with these virgin threads is that people are putting way too much emphasis on sex. I get the sense that the prostitute doesn't turn you off by what she does, but by what she can't do: provide emotional attachment. That is much more powerful than sex, and you're right no prostitute can give that because it's not a temporary thing, it's a long term investment.
What I said earlier was in a harsh tone, I usually don't use a harsh tone, but sometimes it's necessary to get people to see a point. I apologize if I offended you, I really do want to help, but sometimes help requires being an unlikeable hardass. Sabreclaw says "not by choice" is a small thing, I agree that it's a minor phrase, but I disagree on the power it holds. It sends a powerful message to the listener and the message isn't a positive one. Subconsciously people will pick up a sense of deflecting blame and defensiveness which makes them less likely to invest in you. I'd highly recommend eliminating that phrase and replacing it with "I'm a virgin. I've tried like hell, but it just never works." That's the kind of statement people will want to help you with because they sense you're working on it. I mean would you rather have a co-worker who says "I'm doing this job, but not by choice", or a co-worker who says "This job is really tough, but I'm gonna chop wood until it gets easy"?
edit: grammar, as always.
Don't worry it is ok. I don't blame girls who reject, I blame myself because I know I am a mess. The only girls I blame are the ones who fake an interest to mock you or to stroke their ego.
About the expression I don't see anything wrong with it and I will use it if I feel like, independently of what other people think.
Paid sex feels different to me and if I don't want to regard it as an option I am free to do it.
Depends. If she wants to have fun it's ok, but if she really cares for me I wouldn't want perhaps if I find her repulsing, 'cause it could hurt her.
I really agree with this except for the standards thing, not wanting to go to prostitutes is not about standards. Also it should be obvious that we want to remain within the limits of what is valid and reasonable.
Not really the same if you never had a partner. I suspect you might think that we are trying to disregard the trouble a guy who had previous relationship can have finding a new one, but we're not doing that.
This thread is too damn long to read anything. I didn't have oral sex until 20 and I didn't have intercourse until I was 22. I'm finally able to really talk to women at age 27. Honestly, if you want to learn how to talk to women; watch James Bond movies. He's assertive, but he's not an a**hole. He would never hit a woman, but he would also never beg a woman for anything. You have to find the right balance of being nice and assertive and James Bond is honestly the perfect example. I know it sounds silly, but it's true.
That whole "Just be yourself" advice is BS and if you notice, more women give that advice than men. The truth is, you DO have to be yourself to a certain degree; however you have to be yourself without your insecurities. That's what they don't tell you. So, yes be yourself, but be a confident and assertive version of yourself. How do you do that if you're not confident, or assertive? You pretend to be, until you are.
I have this girl talking to me that my buddy put me on the phone with. I didn't know what to say to this girl. She was talking about eating cereal and I just went along with it "Yeah, I love that cereal. I haven't had it since I was a kid." Now the girl wants to hangout with me and all I did was not care what I said to her.
I used to think the same thing, but I see all these young men with so much desire and so little to show for it and I'm now of the opinion that if virginity is affecting one's personality and behavior to the degree they only seethe bitterness, then yes they should visit a prostitute to alleviate the pressure of the stigma they feel. They'd realize that yes, sex is very pleasureable with another person, but it's not an end all be all to existence. Perhaps then with the release of that pressure they'd see that they were working themselves up over nothing and start to develop good attitudes towards the opposite sex which is necessary for what they really want-- not sex, but emotional connection.
So, I'm just wondering who thinks virgins are ugly misogynist clueless idiots?
This is a serious question. Because this thread has me confused.
I don't think anyone here actually seriously does. There was the now-banned MissKong:
https://wrongplanet.net/forums/search.p ... 4&sr=posts
While I think she was harsh, I read what she said as tongue-in-cheek, pushing back against the 'women can get a date/laid whenever they want' and 'girls only want mean guys' bs that crops up here.
Otherwise, I think it's a confusion between attacking what someone says (were you up to reading through, you'd see many a thing about the phrase 'I'm a virgin, not by choice'), and attacking them because they're a virgin.
From what I can tell, a virgin male makes a remark, even has a rant, about his status and his difficulties finding a partner that lapses into sexism and idiocy. He gets pulled up for those lapses, the puller-upper may even remark that that kind of attitude won't help (or even with that kind of attitude they deserve their virgin status), and the virgin male then thinks they're being attacked for being a virgin.
There's a strange martyrdom thing going on with some men here. They seem to think that if other people have problems, this somehow diminishes theirs.
Well, that's the sad reality of it-- they don't understand that negative attitudes are a complete non-starter in the dating game. They try, they fail, they become negative, they try again, become more negative. It's a very very bad cycle. At some point the negative thoughts get directed at women since they see women as the obstacle not their own presentation to women.
It's a moving goalpost. If people know your a virgin, then people will read your posts with a biased slant. Things that would read with a positive connotation, now have a negative connotation if a virgin said it.
wow i just realized something. when you said you are not a doctor, i thought maybe that pic wasnt you. then i thought you were a doctor and lying. lol thats funny. i get it now, you are just a guy in a suit so you look like a doctor.
See, the biggest problem with this statement is that it takes away from the fact that a lot actually are. I think most sane respectful people out there recognize this to be true, women and men alike of all social status. However, enough women have experienced enough shy guys turning out to be massively misogynistic a**holes to where they have the right to be skeptical until someone proves they're a decent enough person.
People have this crazy idea that this stereotype is out to hurt them, and it doesn't have to.. it's just meant for you to recognize this obvious personality flaw so many people have and make sure you don't conform to it yourself. I sure as hell know I did when I was 18 or so.
That's why "not all men" and all variants are annoying as hell, we act as if we need to be defensive about it and we don't.. just read what some women have experienced and don't be those men. It's not hard.
_________________
If Jesus died for my sins, then I should sin as much as possible, so he didn't die for nothing.
I never claim to be no doctor. I'm just me. This was what I was wearing when I went on a cruise with my mother.
Or....are you here to pull my chain somehow?
It's going to be awhile before he can answer you.
Also check to see if the OP and Magi are the same people given that the OP hasn't responded so it makes me wonder.
They do not appear to be sockpuppets.
Magi has been given a one month ban.
_________________
AQ 34
Your Aspie score: 104 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 116 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
I never claim to be no doctor. I'm just me. This was what I was wearing when I went on a cruise with my mother.
Or....are you here to pull my chain somehow?
you have a chain? i'm just fleshy stuff.
*imagines kraftierobocop*
_________________
"When does the human cost become too high for the building of a better machine?"
People have this crazy idea that this stereotype is out to hurt them, and it doesn't have to.. it's just meant for you to recognize this obvious personality flaw so many people have and make sure you don't conform to it yourself. I sure as hell know I did when I was 18 or so.
What a massive load of nonsense. Everybody starts barking like rabid dogs if a guy says such stereotypes about women but now it is fair to make these awful generalizations about guys who are already having a hard time. Hey they are only a bunch of bedroom nerds anyway so who cares, they should just man the hell up, these useless nerds.
That's why "not all men" and all variants are annoying as hell, we act as if we need to be defensive about it and we don't.. just read what some women have experienced and don't be those men. It's not hard.
If they have experienced it I don't really care and it's none of my business, if they treat me bad because of some virgin a**hole from their past, I will be mean to them because it is not my fault and they shouldn't blame me for it. I had women do it in the past and I won't allow it anymore.
