RetroGamer87 wrote:
I wasn't aware that the baggy style had gone anywhere.
wilburforce wrote:
My point stands, though--that I'm not the one who made it a gender thing. Guys make it a gender thing by telling women tattoos make women look "ugly" and "masculine".
Yes your point stands and guys shouldn't say that. Tattoos aren't feminine or masculine. I've seen equal numbers of them on guys and girls.
It's very silly, to gender tattoos. My half sleeve is a very colourful design of autumn leaves changing colour (maple and oak, done in reds and golds and greens) over a dappled blue-purple background--so although it's a tattoo and by nature what some would call "masculine" just for being a tattoo, the design itself is organic, vibrant, and even what some might call "feminine".
What I don't understand is the need to categorise and label things very black-and-white, the binary simplified dualistic thinking behind claims like "all tattoos are hideous just for being tattoos"--it just often seems like an excuse to dismiss things that are different that one doesn't want to understand. Gender is one of the ways people apply that kind of binary thinking to things, but it's not the only way. Things are either 100% good or 100% bad, and there is no in between. I think it limits people, and it limits discussion.
_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War
(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)