rdos wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
Yes if you catchall you are viewing that person as a sexual object rather than a person and harassing them. Hence why people are horrified it it happens to a family member.
Not at all. Catcalling is a compliment to the woman in the natural environment. It means "you look good". It's also a way to get the attention from a stranger woman. It's Western culture and feminism that has managed to pervert it into something it isn't.
Alliekit wrote:
Have you heard of burden of proof. If you make a claim it is up to you to support and provide evidence (I. E. Proof). If you fail to provide evidence your claim is invalid. You are committing the logical fallacy of argument through ignorance because it is not up to someone else to disprove your claim.
I gave a clear hint of how to find the evidence, and that is all that I will do. If people are not willing to put any effort into an argument, I don't need to feed them any information either. Actually, I have no hope at all that these people will listen to anything I say, much less understand the argument, so it is a useless discussion from my POV.
I have objections aplenty to much of feminism, but on this point they are exactly right. It's a reduction of women to mere rags and strips them of their humanity. In practice, it's not a celebration of femininity but is rather harassment and threatening.
I will agree that it's largely a cultural perception. Catcalling will appeal to a certain type of woman of, likely, similar or equivalent social station as those perpetrating the behavior. Girls like that don't see those men as threats and enjoy the attention, particularly if they already know the men doing this. Women are mostly fearful of this kind of behavior, and for good reason. These are not the kinds of men they want to spend any time with, and often these men don't have their best interests at heart.