What are your thoughts on Polyamory or Polygamy?

Page 5 of 11 [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

OutsideView
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,022
Location: England ^not male but apparently you can't change it

20 Mar 2021, 7:11 am

auntblabby wrote:
in heaven the "air" itself is one big 420 :hic: :drunken: :colors:

What's special about the number 420?


_________________
Silence lies steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House. And we who walk here, walk alone.


Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,019
Location: State of Euphoria

20 Mar 2021, 11:56 am

OutsideView wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
in heaven the "air" itself is one big 420 :hic: :drunken: :colors:

What's special about the number 420?


Hi Not Male,

This.


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.


Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,019
Location: State of Euphoria

20 Mar 2021, 11:57 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
One is bad enough. If I had multiple partners tormenting me my head would explode!


Yes one at a time please. My social processor isn't fast enough to keep up with more than one at a time. :alien:


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.


OutsideView
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,022
Location: England ^not male but apparently you can't change it

20 Mar 2021, 12:24 pm

I wonder how many of us would want to be poly if we could cope with that many people versus how many would still want to be with only one person anyway. I'd definitely like to have more friends if I could (and if I knew how) but would still only like one person for romance and sex.

Gentleman Argentum wrote:

Thanks! Never heard that before.


_________________
Silence lies steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House. And we who walk here, walk alone.


old_comedywriter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 819
Location: Somewhere west of where you are

20 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm

Not for me either.

For me, "friends with benefits" means you have health insurance and a 401k.


_________________
It ain't easy being me, but someone's gotta do it.


Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,019
Location: State of Euphoria

20 Mar 2021, 4:33 pm

OutsideView wrote:
I wonder how many of us would want to be poly if we could cope with that many people versus how many would still want to be with only one person anyway. I'd definitely like to have more friends if I could (and if I knew how) but would still only like one person for romance and sex.

Gentleman Argentum wrote:

Thanks! Never heard that before.


I don't know, I think even if my social processing unit (spu) got upgraded to NT, I'd still prefer one woman. I get jealous, plus she would get jealous. It's wild some people look at things differently, I just am me.


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.


Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 7:28 pm

Mountain Goat wrote:
Mormonism is a religion on its own. It is not Christianity as it does not comply to the fundamental core principles of what Christianity is.

But going to the practice of having more then one wife or more then one husband. Isn't it obvious why God chose ar a certain time for men to have just one wife? (Apart from having more then one mother in law! :D ) It was because marriage is a very close commitment. When one has more then one wife or husband, one simply cant spend the time with each one as one should.
I could not cope with more then one woman. One woman would be all that I could handle because marriage is a continual "Full on" experience, and it is a continual work in progress cemented together in love.
How can one do this effectively whilst being married to more then one person?

Some people may have for example a gf who can't spend much time in the relationship because she's on the spectrum. so then all the time you wish and need to dedicate will not be able to be spent.

Then there are just intellectual partners or partners which connect through sex more so it's not exactly patternized on your needs or desires, they complete them. Best to have 2 partners than emotionally invest in a friend while committed, it's emotionally disloyal.


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 7:38 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with it, if it's consensual between all parties. But I do not think I would want that, seems like it would be quite complicated to have more than one relationship at the same time.
Being complicated depends on the terms of the relationship, for example if you don't want to get too much into things keep it light and not share every detail of the other relationships. If you schedule meetings and have time on your hands. Everyone's different though, what's easy for a person may be hard for another.

If you're passionate about it, it's not hard work, it's pleasant and worth it.


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 7:46 pm

magz wrote:
Not my cup od tea. I'm very much "depth over width" kind of person in such contexts.

I'm overly intense and deep and I deem that an issue, it's always driven me crazy at some point, and I lose my mind over it, becomes uncontrollable and unhealthy.
With multiple people, it doesn't enter my hyperfocus so much especially if Im not comitting even if emotionally involved, and I can realize what's going on, and that there's more to it, as well as swap focus and get on with my life. That is mostly if it's drama free which are the ties I try to keep.


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 8:02 pm

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
A whole nested polyamorous society would lead to a STD pandemic disaster.

There’s no guarantee that one of the 3-4 poly circle wouldn’t have a relation with someone in another poly circle and so on.

Depends on what kind of erotic activity the partners engage in, in the first place, as well as on whether they take the relevant safety precautions, e.g. condoms.

Some poly people do PIV and/or oral sex with just one partner, and do other kinds of erotic activity (kink/fetish) with other partners. Such arrangements are equivalent to monogamy as far as exposure to other people's body fluids is concerned.


No PIV or oral (they also couldn't kiss)..... then what do they do?

fingering, toy play, spanking etc. Plus they may be asexual


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Last edited by Rexi on 21 Mar 2021, 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 8:04 pm

Pepe wrote:
Texasmoneyman300 wrote:
robotrecall wrote:
What are your thoughts on non-monogamous relationships? Polyamory is a more recent term that means numerous loves. Basically, a married couple can have a gf/bf or numerous gf's/bf's. Non-married couples can have numerous partners as well. Usually the relationships aren't just sexual; they're also romantic and emotional relationships. Any sexual orientation can be Polyamorous; usually the most common sexual orientations that are polyamorous are bisexual, gay male/ male homosexual, and heterosexual. Polygamy is usually one man many wives, or one woman many husbands, but I can see homosexual polygamous relationships being a thing, if it wasn't mainly a religious thing. Usually Mormons or Muslims are the groups that marry different women or men. Even though Christianity looks down upon this type of relationship, Mormonism is the only sect of Christianity that practices Polygamy. There's also different types of non-monogamous relationships like swinging, which is usually a couple having sexual relationships with other couples. Open relationships are different, which is a main couple having a relationship with another another person, which is a secondary relationship. Discuss your opinions here.


Polygamy sounds really appealing to me but I would never do it personally.


Being autistic, I would find being polyamorous mentally exhausting.
Not interested. 8)

Healthy relationships are supposed to be comfortable and make you happy. That includes not doing anything more than what you feel like doing, when you feel like doing it. You can just relax together or talk.


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Rexi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."

21 Mar 2021, 8:18 pm

Gentleman Argentum wrote:
OutsideView wrote:
I wonder how many of us would want to be poly if we could cope with that many people versus how many would still want to be with only one person anyway. I'd definitely like to have more friends if I could (and if I knew how) but would still only like one person for romance and sex.

Gentleman Argentum wrote:

Thanks! Never heard that before.


I don't know, I think even if my social processing unit (spu) got upgraded to NT, I'd still prefer one woman. I get jealous, plus she would get jealous. It's wild some people look at things differently, I just am me.

Jealousy is inevitable and it's not a problem when you agree from the getgo and make no false beliefs about how we are going to be with others. At least that's for me. You have to deal with it and not let it consume you. It was always a big issue in my commitments and surprisingly it barely is with my multiple men now, given that im not in a poly commitment but have multiple partners that I invest emotionally in, hopefully for long-term.


_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. :heart: x :heart:

Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.


Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,019
Location: State of Euphoria

22 Mar 2021, 2:27 am

Rexi wrote:
Gentleman Argentum wrote:
OutsideView wrote:
I wonder how many of us would want to be poly if we could cope with that many people versus how many would still want to be with only one person anyway. I'd definitely like to have more friends if I could (and if I knew how) but would still only like one person for romance and sex.

Gentleman Argentum wrote:

Thanks! Never heard that before.


I don't know, I think even if my social processing unit (spu) got upgraded to NT, I'd still prefer one woman. I get jealous, plus she would get jealous. It's wild some people look at things differently, I just am me.

Jealousy is inevitable and it's not a problem when you agree from the getgo and make no false beliefs about how we are going to be with others. At least that's for me. You have to deal with it and not let it consume you. It was always a big issue in my commitments and surprisingly it barely is with my multiple men now, given that im not in a poly commitment but have multiple partners that I invest emotionally in, hopefully for long-term.


Most guys haven't the luxury of even considering poly. You're rather different than most women, most demand exclusivity from their male partner. I read this in female profiles, it is often mentioned: "No hookups, monogamous only..." In fact, one woman (@ OKCupid) rejected me while we were matched and texting, because I had dared to mention short-term dating in my profile. She concluded I was a "playa" and also found fault with an answer I gave to the questionnaire in which I favored the legalization of marijuana. Oh! the scandal! :alien:

I admire your versatility, however a thought in the back of my mind is, perhaps this is how you make your living? I do not mean to offend, I am for legalization and normalization of that occupation, but it has always seemed to me that the Aspy trait would be ideal in some ways for that profession. But what do I know?


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

22 Mar 2021, 7:25 am

“420” is some marijuana laws in California.



r00tb33r
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 May 2016
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,953

22 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm

I suppose there are many reasons why poly-anything relationships aren't as common and why most won't even consider. Here are some I can think of off the top of my head:

1. If these relationships involve sexual encounters with multiple partners, it's an STD epidemic waiting to happen. This is because the group is not necessarily exclusive, meaning each participant may have their own "network" of partners who are not the same set as the other.

2. Splitting time between multiple romantic interests means not giving a romantic interest your full attention and energy. It makes the relationship sporadic and disjointed. This is only for people with very few commitments and responsibilities. Between a full-time job, maintaining a household (home & other property), supporting the birth family, possibly children, who could possibly have enough time and energy for multiple partners and relationships? This is a fantasy.

3. Close emotional involvement with multiple individuals may lead to situations where a problem of one becomes a problem of six, as the emotional distress may pass from person to person due to negative experiences and sudden mood changes, especially if individuals are unaware of each other, and negative experiences are unexpected and without an understood reason. Think of it like spreading mental STDs. This isn't meant to offend anyone, just an analogy.

Jealousy was mentioned earlier in the thread.

People aren't computers, they can't form romantic mesh networks. This isn't healthy.



Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,019
Location: State of Euphoria

22 Mar 2021, 4:27 pm

r00tb33r wrote:
I suppose there are many reasons why poly-anything relationships aren't as common and why most won't even consider. Here are some I can think of off the top of my head:

1. If these relationships involve sexual encounters with multiple partners, it's an STD epidemic waiting to happen. This is because the group is not necessarily exclusive, meaning each participant may have their own "network" of partners who are not the same set as the other.

2. Splitting time between multiple romantic interests means not giving a romantic interest your full attention and energy. It makes the relationship sporadic and disjointed. This is only for people with very few commitments and responsibilities. Between a full-time job, maintaining a household (home & other property), supporting the birth family, possibly children, who could possibly have enough time and energy for multiple partners and relationships? This is a fantasy.

3. Close emotional involvement with multiple individuals may lead to situations where a problem of one becomes a problem of six, as the emotional distress may pass from person to person due to negative experiences and sudden mood changes, especially if individuals are unaware of each other, and negative experiences are unexpected and without an understood reason. Think of it like spreading mental STDs. This isn't meant to offend anyone, just an analogy.

Jealousy was mentioned earlier in the thread.

People aren't computers, they can't form romantic mesh networks. This isn't healthy.


Regarding your last statement, I'm inclined toward skepticism, but situations vary so much. Me, I work a full-time job, have to keep a house, have a modest income. There aren't any servants around going to do my house chores for me.

Now a Polyam, I imagine they're all living in a house together sharing the rent and housechores and f*ing and s*ing six ways to Sunday. And spanking those that failed to do housechores, putting them in bondage gear and getting out the strap. Whatever.

Either that, or they are higher income individuals, have much more time on their hands for leisure and socialization than a person like me.

Or maybe it is just down to personality differences and personal preferences.

I am not opposed to someone going the polyam route, whatever floats their boat... just have insufficient data to form an educated opinion, being that I have never in all my days seen a polyam relationship, at least, knowingly. Maybe they were in the closet and I did meet someone along the path of life, I don't know.


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.