Look, forget the other stuff, the only answer I'm marginally interested in at the moment is why you believe:
Quote:
that the partner who ends up financially disadvantaged after divorce (husband OR wife) is entitled to support if they wish to seek it.
A question you nimbly avoided like a mountain goat. Why does anyone deserve to maintain a standard of living after a marriage contract is broken? I can't think of a good reason.
if you want to discuss it, take it to another thread. this is off-topic.