Cross referancing this post:
ahayes wrote:
calandale wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
ahayes wrote:
A marriage between two of the same gender is not a marriage, just a perversion.
True.
Fine. Then let's seperate marriage from the state sponsored status. Remove marriage from the law, and replace it with civil unions. I don't really like the idea of a religious concept being so closely tied with the law anyhow.
No, because marriage is generally an agreement to start a family. A union with homosexual is only an agreement to engage in sexual perversion.
With this post made in the 'Gay Pill' thread:
ahayes wrote:
I don't think a pill would be required. If I wanted to be gay, I could be. But I'm never going to make that CHOICE.
Leads me to believe that you're trying to hide something. --Personally I really don't care, but at the same time would you please explain this? Are you in fact saying that any gay/bisexual urges that you feel are to be repressed because of religious/cultural upbringing, and that you would impose those religious/cultural values upon others irregardless of whether or not they do not share those values?
_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!