Morally much worse men than you.
Spiderpig wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Meeks was born in Washington on February 7, 1984, and is the son of Katherine Angier[6] and brother of Emery Meeks.[7]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
This criminal guy....is more successful dating wise than ALL of you, guys (Because he is very handsome).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-20/w ... ot/5537580
Not just handsome. It takes some serious courage, strength and survival skills to be a competent criminal.
Not sure if this is meant, 'tongue in cheek' or not so... I think courage is the wrong word. I would judge that he lacks forethought as to the risks his behavour carries, including those of a physical nature. I also think to class as competent he would need to have got away with his crimes.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Chronos wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Meeks was born in Washington on February 7, 1984, and is the son of Katherine Angier[6] and brother of Emery Meeks.[7]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
This criminal guy....is more successful dating wise than ALL of you, guys (Because he is very handsome).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-20/w ... ot/5537580
And he probably isn't traumatized or easily deterred rejection. He certainly isn't easily deterred from crime by incarceration.
It seems you are trying to justify that they didn't like him for looks only.
Those women liked him because he's very hot looking and there's no more to it , not because of a personality trait , they just saw his pic on the internet - stop trying to give deeper meanings to things which aren't there.
So no, they didn't like him because he isn't easily deterred or such b.s.
...and I am not easily deterred by silly posts like this one or by rejection or by whatever you are trying to imply.
It's probably because he's "hot" and confident.
Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Because he’s hot, and that’s it.
He looks confident to you because he looks hot.
I don't find him attractive because he looks like a thug and a jerk. I think I could find him attractive if I came across him with a different persona, but looking at the picture made me feel like I was standing within reach of a rottweiler. Some women find that feeling exciting, I don't, just unpleasant.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
kraftiekortie wrote:
I just don't believe most women are stupid enough to go out with a man who lacks morals.
Heeh surely you've not known many women in your life ...
Women will pick up with any guy if he can charm them enough. Why do you think ex cons and gangster dudes can get girls and yet decent, nerdy dudes struggle so hard??? Its all about the charm, believe me. I got 2 neices both with dudes who are not only ex convicts who've been in prison but semi active gang members too. My sister, even as a christian woman of god has always been attracted to that gangster aesthetic on a black man and that's the reason why she is still single to this day.
I could go on for days about what I've seen not only in my family but even out and about women and girls either in school or in the work place that seem to get suckered by this type of guy. Though while I'm on the subject, on the flipside I've had plenty of family members tell me "why I don't have a boyfriend" or "why I can't keep a boyfriend", except now I have a boyfriend in a long distance relationship who I just cracked a year with last week so now everyone can shut their mouths (;
fluffysaurus wrote:
Not sure if this is meant, 'tongue in cheek' or not so... I think courage is the wrong word. I would judge that he lacks forethought as to the risks his behavour carries, including those of a physical nature.
I was being serious, but talking in general, since I know nothing about that specific guy.
fluffysaurus wrote:
I also think to class as competent he would need to have got away with his crimes.
He was competent enough for his criminal career to last however long it did. I know I’d be hard-pressed to survive my first attempt to do anything naughty, and would probably starve to death or be killed by someone for being at the wrong place at the wrong time if I found myself on the street with no other livelihood.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Chronos wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Meeks was born in Washington on February 7, 1984, and is the son of Katherine Angier[6] and brother of Emery Meeks.[7]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
This criminal guy....is more successful dating wise than ALL of you, guys (Because he is very handsome).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-20/w ... ot/5537580
And he probably isn't traumatized or easily deterred rejection. He certainly isn't easily deterred from crime by incarceration.
It seems you are trying to justify that they didn't like him for looks only.
Those women liked him because he's very hot looking and there's no more to it , not because of a personality trait , they just saw his pic on the internet - stop trying to give deeper meanings to things which aren't there.
So no, they didn't like him because he isn't easily deterred or such b.s.
...and I am not easily deterred by silly posts like this one or by rejection or by whatever you are trying to imply.
It's probably because he's "hot" and confident.
Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Because he’s hot, and that’s it.
He looks confident to you because he looks hot.
He doesn't look "hot" to me.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Spiderpig wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
Not sure if this is meant, 'tongue in cheek' or not so... I think courage is the wrong word. I would judge that he lacks forethought as to the risks his behavour carries, including those of a physical nature.
I was being serious, but talking in general, since I know nothing about that specific guy.
fluffysaurus wrote:
I also think to class as competent he would need to have got away with his crimes.
He was competent enough for his criminal career to last however long it did. I know I’d be hard-pressed to survive my first attempt to do anything naughty, and would probably starve to death or be killed by someone for being at the wrong place at the wrong time if I found myself on the street with no other livelihood.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
green0star wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I just don't believe most women are stupid enough to go out with a man who lacks morals.
Heeh surely you've not known many women in your life ...
Women will pick up with any guy if he can charm them enough. Why do you think ex cons and gangster dudes can get girls and yet decent, nerdy dudes struggle so hard??? Its all about the charm, believe me. I got 2 neices both with dudes who are not only ex convicts who've been in prison but semi active gang members too. My sister, even as a christian woman of god has always been attracted to that gangster aesthetic on a black man and that's the reason why she is still single to this day.
I could go on for days about what I've seen not only in my family but even out and about women and girls either in school or in the work place that seem to get suckered by this type of guy. Though while I'm on the subject, on the flipside I've had plenty of family members tell me "why I don't have a boyfriend" or "why I can't keep a boyfriend", except now I have a boyfriend in a long distance relationship who I just cracked a year with last week so now everyone can shut their mouths (;
O.o
green0star wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I just don't believe most women are stupid enough to go out with a man who lacks morals.
Heeh surely you've not known many women in your life ...
Women will pick up with any guy if he can charm them enough. Why do you think ex cons and gangster dudes can get girls and yet decent, nerdy dudes struggle so hard??? Its all about the charm, believe me. I got 2 neices both with dudes who are not only ex convicts who've been in prison but semi active gang members too. My sister, even as a christian woman of god has always been attracted to that gangster aesthetic on a black man and that's the reason why she is still single to this day.
I could go on for days about what I've seen not only in my family but even out and about women and girls either in school or in the work place that seem to get suckered by this type of guy. Though while I'm on the subject, on the flipside I've had plenty of family members tell me "why I don't have a boyfriend" or "why I can't keep a boyfriend", except now I have a boyfriend in a long distance relationship who I just cracked a year with last week so now everyone can shut their mouths (;
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Chronos wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Meeks was born in Washington on February 7, 1984, and is the son of Katherine Angier[6] and brother of Emery Meeks.[7]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
This criminal guy....is more successful dating wise than ALL of you, guys (Because he is very handsome).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-20/w ... ot/5537580
And he probably isn't traumatized or easily deterred rejection. He certainly isn't easily deterred from crime by incarceration.
It seems you are trying to justify that they didn't like him for looks only.
Those women liked him because he's very hot looking and there's no more to it , not because of a personality trait , they just saw his pic on the internet - stop trying to give deeper meanings to things which aren't there.
So no, they didn't like him because he isn't easily deterred or such b.s.
...and I am not easily deterred by silly posts like this one or by rejection or by whatever you are trying to imply.
It's probably because he's "hot" and confident.
Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Because he’s hot, and that’s it.
He looks confident to you because he looks hot.
He doesn't look "hot" to me.
He looks like an evil robot.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
RetroGamer87 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Chronos wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Meeks was born in Washington on February 7, 1984, and is the son of Katherine Angier[6] and brother of Emery Meeks.[7]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
In 2002, Meeks was charged with robbery and corporal injury to a child. Meeks had violently assaulted a 16-year-old boy. After making a plea deal, he was sentenced to serve two years in a California prison. During this time he had admitted that he was a member of the North Side Gangster Crips.[8]
This criminal guy....is more successful dating wise than ALL of you, guys (Because he is very handsome).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-20/w ... ot/5537580
And he probably isn't traumatized or easily deterred rejection. He certainly isn't easily deterred from crime by incarceration.
It seems you are trying to justify that they didn't like him for looks only.
Those women liked him because he's very hot looking and there's no more to it , not because of a personality trait , they just saw his pic on the internet - stop trying to give deeper meanings to things which aren't there.
So no, they didn't like him because he isn't easily deterred or such b.s.
...and I am not easily deterred by silly posts like this one or by rejection or by whatever you are trying to imply.
It's probably because he's "hot" and confident.
Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Because he’s hot, and that’s it.
He looks confident to you because he looks hot.
He doesn't look "hot" to me.
He looks like an evil robot.
Yep.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
kraftiekortie wrote:
Never heard the word "cracked." I've always thought it meant "crazy."
cracked the problem, found the answer. Cracked it.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
Just because you're a model, you're not necessarily any hotter than other people who don't model because they have better things to do.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
314pe wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
He doesn't look "hot" to me.
For some, even professional models do not look physically attractive. It is nice to remember this when you get rejected for your looks.
This is very true. I "reject" "hot" people regularly, in the sense that their looks do nothing for me so I don't give them a second glance.
I remember an ex wouldn't let me have a certain actor as my 'free pass' because he said he was totally obtainable if I did actually meet him. I think he's extremely attractive - I'd choose him over Ryan Gosling for sure - yet most would probably say he's average or a bit unattractive.
