AquaineBay wrote:
Okay guys let me give you the gist of what he is asking. He is wondering if a woman who's career fell through, and has not had a date or relationship all the way up into her 30s is a red flag.
The funny thing is, if this was a man society would say "yes" in a heartbeat and then deem him a "loser". Whether you(the people advising him) would think so or not really isn't much because you are 1 person out of 7,000,000,000 people on the planet. I personally wouldn't think it a red flag(and I shouldn't because I am a 27 year old guy and have not dated or been in a relationship) this isn't about me though and in general across the world yes, most would consider that a red flag(even if they won't admit it) unless said person had religious reasons or some type of disability for not dating. Let me remind you all that she has not dated or had a relationship let alone doing the "deed" in all of this time. If someone considered that a red flag about me I wouldn't blame them because I know that things like this do matter to some degree.
Side note: The irony is that no one has denied the post I made about women judging men on these same merits. If we want a more "equal" dating world then we have to start holding women accountable for their actions just as we hold men accountable for their actions(whether it be "good" or "bad").
Because…. people generally don’t think of men and women in the same way, and that’s a fact.
An over-30 healthy non-hideous virgin (or dateless) woman is most likely assumed to be virgin by choice.
While a healthy over-30 virgin man (or dateless) is most likely assumed to be virgin because he failed to attract anyone aka a loser, unless he’s utra religious.
The word “loser” is very rarely used on women, I don’t recall an instance of woman or man calling a woman loser.
But yes I do agree if the genders were reversed the tones of the responses would most likely be very different.