The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Jul 2013, 12:41 pm
16 Jul 2013, 12:44 pm
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
I've heard of body hair "migrating" as men age, but if we're talking about mature adults they're not suddenly going to go Wolfman at thirty. 
would be funny if they did
16 Jul 2013, 12:57 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
If hairiness and amount of sexual experience are correlated then I would be humping right now at the moment.
Or there would be an entirely new application for Rogaine....
belladonna25:
16 Jul 2013, 1:02 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Jul 2013, 1:09 pm
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
BlackSabre7 wrote:
I shall be brave and say what I think it is.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
I am gonna be the first to tear you apart:
That post of yours is ridiculous :-/ - what the sexual experience (experienced men vs inexperienced "boys?" (by boys you're referring to age?)) has anything to do with hairy vs not hairy?
Boo, can you not see that younger guys generally have less hair than older guys? I think that was the point there, in regards to boys vs men.
Schneekugel wrote:
Normally as a younger boy you dont have that much hair, and its getting more and more the older you get. I dont know that many men closely, but at my partner its correct. So as a young men he had some hair at feet and breast, but now with 31 they are becoming much more along the breast, between belly and intim zone its a fur, and he gets them now at his backshoulders as well. ^^ *raaorrr*
There are adult men who are hairless and other adult men who are hairy
And there are sexually inexperienced hairy men
and there are sexually experience hairless men
and all other combos.
That like saying that short men are boys or flat chested women are little girls...
..oh wait, a lot of you women do think like that, do you?
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Jul 2013, 1:13 pm
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Then you are underaged and not allowed to see.
Lol I'm 25, there's nothing underage about me.
I highly doubt that for some reason.
Lol, what do you doubt that? Is there something about me that makes you think I am not an adult?
I can't tell you here in public, sorry.
16 Jul 2013, 1:19 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Then you are underaged and not allowed to see.
Lol I'm 25, there's nothing underage about me.
I highly doubt that for some reason.
Lol, what do you doubt that? Is there something about me that makes you think I am not an adult?
I can't tell you here in public, sorry.
Erm OK...can you tell me in pm?
16 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
BlackSabre7 wrote:
I shall be brave and say what I think it is.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
I am gonna be the first to tear you apart:
That post of yours is ridiculous :-/ - what the sexual experience (experienced men vs inexperienced "boys?" (by boys you're referring to age?)) has anything to do with hairy vs not hairy?
Boo, can you not see that younger guys generally have less hair than older guys? I think that was the point there, in regards to boys vs men.
Schneekugel wrote:
Normally as a younger boy you dont have that much hair, and its getting more and more the older you get. I dont know that many men closely, but at my partner its correct. So as a young men he had some hair at feet and breast, but now with 31 they are becoming much more along the breast, between belly and intim zone its a fur, and he gets them now at his backshoulders as well. ^^ *raaorrr*
There are adult men who are hairless and other adult men who are hairy
And there are sexually inexperienced hairy men
and there are sexually experience hairless men
and all other combos.
That like saying that short men are boys or flat chested women are little girls...
..oh wait, a lot of you women do think like that, do you?
Ouch. I've never heard that from a woman. A lot of women want a man taller than them but I gather it has more to do with appearance of submissive femininity versus dominant masculinity. As a woman who's had relationships with shorter guys (and not cared myself) I know that a lot of folks say things like "well I can see who wears the pants here!" and stupid stuff like that... I don't take it on board, but a lot of gals do. Also I'm flat-chested and no one treats me like a little girl.
16 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Then you are underaged and not allowed to see.
Lol I'm 25, there's nothing underage about me.
I highly doubt that for some reason.
Lol, what do you doubt that? Is there something about me that makes you think I am not an adult?
I can't tell you here in public, sorry.
Erm OK...can you tell me in pm?
I can, but why would I?
16 Jul 2013, 3:11 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Then you are underaged and not allowed to see.
Lol I'm 25, there's nothing underage about me.
I highly doubt that for some reason.
Lol, what do you doubt that? Is there something about me that makes you think I am not an adult?
I can't tell you here in public, sorry.
Erm OK...can you tell me in pm?
I can, but why would I?
I have decided to ignore you from now on...you're more hassle than it's worth
16 Jul 2013, 3:20 pm
16 Jul 2013, 3:30 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Jul 2013, 3:50 pm
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
belladonna25 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Then you are underaged and not allowed to see.
Lol I'm 25, there's nothing underage about me.
I highly doubt that for some reason.
Lol, what do you doubt that? Is there something about me that makes you think I am not an adult?
I can't tell you here in public, sorry.
Erm OK...can you tell me in pm?
I can, but why would I?
I have decided to ignore you from now on...you're more hassle than it's worth
Ok, kid.
16 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
I have no idea michelle, no idea.
BlackSabre7
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia
16 Jul 2013, 7:30 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
BlackSabre7 wrote:
I shall be brave and say what I think it is.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
When young, you are looking more than anything else, so pretty matters, and you are also not experienced, so you don't know any better.
After you have been around a bit, you learn that good sex is more about how things feel, and what you do, than how you look. Looks help to get things going initially, but when you are into it, they don't play a part. Especially not for women. Plus there seems to be some animalistic thing that takes over - it is not exactly a higher function - it is about as base as you can get.
After you experience the good stuff, why would you want to go back to inexperienced boys? Let the young girls have them, they an learn on each other. I have already paid my dues.
I have absolutely no idea whether anyone else feels this way or it's just me. I don't ever talk about this to anyone, so if you are going to tear me apart, do it nicely.
I am gonna be the first to tear you apart:
That post of yours is ridiculous :-/ - what the sexual experience (experienced men vs inexperienced "boys?" (by boys you're referring to age?)) has anything to do with hairy vs not hairy?
Actually, you totally misunderstood me.
I was not intending to correlate a man's hairiness with his experience, but I can see why you read it that way. I did not make it clear. I spliced two thoughts together without meaning to, to create the Frankinstein's monster of a post that you interpreted.
An inexperienced GIRL would focus on appearance of hair and not find it attractive, but a more experienced woman would know that hairiness can feel really nice and tap into more primal feelings when doing the oinky boinky. So she would then be attracted to hairiness.
This first thought focuses on the WOMAN's learning curve over time.
Of course, the second thought... that once you understand how experience trumps looks, then you also find younger men less attractive because they are not experienced..... focuses on how it then affects her preferences.
The fact that older men tend to be more hairy is convenient for ladies who do go through that particular learning curve. Individual experiences will affect individual attitudes. Women who learn to be turned on by smooth, muscly men, for example, may never learn to like hairy ones.
Lucky for the smooth men.
But no, I absolutely agree, it is stupid to assume hairiness correlates with sexual prowess. Maybe someone did a study to rule it out?
I am sure hairy young men are just as crap in bed as non-hairy ones, on average.
Last edited by BlackSabre7 on 17 Jul 2013, 8:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
