Page 7 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jan 2014, 4:56 am

American,

These tips are experimented and do work to increase your chances of getting replies:

- If you are physically fit and toned, post a shirtless pic in some beach or activity, that attracts their attention. Even the famous user yellowtamarin (long story) who previously opposed to shirtless guys pics changed her mind and is now advocate for shirtless guys (she probably secretly has my shirtless pics on her computer - long story too).

- Don't waste your time to message offline women, message only the "Online Now" and if you are targeting someone in specific and she's offline check again later and message her the first time until she's online. Sending her a message while she's online will make a pop-up appears on her page/app, also women receive tons of messages even while they'er offline so they'll have tons of messages to check the next time they come online.

- if you are chatting (real-time) with someone, reply fast to her IMs, make her hooked to the chat, otherwise she'll be distracted by other guys chatting her.

- As others said, if you are not getting phone/kik/skype in the next 3-4 messages or not leading to a meet up then you're wasting your time.



warsend
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 132

09 Jan 2014, 5:35 am

Dox47 wrote:
warsend wrote:
congrats! I feel like 3 messages is too quick but it might catch them off guard to ask them too soon


Thanks!

Personally, I think I've squandered more dating opportunities by messaging too much before inviting someone out than by asking too soon; in my case I'm much better at making conversation in person than online, and if the other person isn't giving me much material to go on in their replies, I feel like I can get boring and talk about myself too much (I can be excruciatingly self aware). I think online conversations have a definite shelf life, and since you don't know exactly what it is for any particular person, it's better to err on the bold side.

One thing I've done to make things easier for myself is subscribe to my city magazine (Seattle Magazine in my case), so that I always have a list of new restaurants and bars at my fingertips, the better to craft a "hey, I just heard about this new place that sounds cool, want to check it out with me?" type invitation. I always show up early and grab a seat at the bar (if there is one) or at a visible table, then send a text saying where I am and what I'm wearing; I've learned that a lot of women like to cruise by and get a look at you when doing a first date off of a website (to make sure you look like your pictures, aren't visibly creepy, etc), and by making it easy for them to do this I put them at ease. It's a little thing, but it tends to be appreciated (and no, I've never had someone ditch after getting a look at me).


I'm starting to agree that around 5 messages is about right. I assume you mean 3 messages by you and not total? I'm at 5, 10 total with this one girl and am confused at what's going on.



KingofKaboom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,471

09 Jan 2014, 6:16 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
American,

These tips are experimented and do work to increase your chances of getting replies:

- If you are physically fit and toned, post a shirtless pic in some beach or activity, that attracts their attention. Even the famous user yellowtamarin (long story) who previously opposed to shirtless guys pics changed her mind and is now advocate for shirtless guys (she probably secretly has my shirtless pics on her computer - long story too).

- Don't waste your time to message offline women, message only the "Online Now" and if you are targeting someone in specific and she's offline check again later and message her the first time until she's online. Sending her a message while she's online will make a pop-up appears on her page/app, also women receive tons of messages even while they'er offline so they'll have tons of messages to check the next time they come online.

- if you are chatting (real-time) with someone, reply fast to her IMs, make her hooked to the chat, otherwise she'll be distracted by other guys chatting her.

- As others said, if you are not getting phone/kik/skype in the next 3-4 messages or not leading to a meet up then you're wasting your time.
Awe wish I had a toned fit sexy bod :'(. Ah well the girls I like usually don't care about that. By next year I'll be fit if I keep exercising.


_________________
Tacos (optional)


Eureka13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2013
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,058
Location: The wilds of Colorado

09 Jan 2014, 8:28 am

A little more on the "shirtless pic" thing.

Personally, if a man posts a pic where he has deliberately posed shirtless, I ignore the profile. Period. However, if it's a photo where he would naturally appear shirtless, such as at the beach, that's okay.

To be fair, my being revolted by guys posting a selfie of their pecs taken in the bathroom mirror may have something to do with my age. :)



Eureka13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2013
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,058
Location: The wilds of Colorado

09 Jan 2014, 8:38 am

I'm also curious as to whether anyone has any thoughts about online dating in a rural area....

The last time I did it, the interesting prospects within 250-300 miles of me were limited to exactly one person. He was the person who became my fiance, and he was still 170 miles away.

How do you "ask someone out" when they live 200-300 miles away? (The way I did it with my late fiance was that I traveled to his area semi-regularly for work, so it was easy to say, "hey, I've gotta be over there for work next XXXday.....care to meet for lunch?") I suspect that whatever man I might find who interests me this time is not going to be within my work travel area. I've poked around a little on a couple of the "look for free" sites, and there simply aren't any of interest closer than the nearest big cities (200-300 miles away).

I'm willing to date someone that far away because one or both of us is at or near retirement age, and relocating is not out of the question (also, I don't mind traveling on weekends - I love to drive). Should I make up an excuse to go to where they live and see if they want to have lunch while I'm there?



buffinator
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 651
Location: Illinois

09 Jan 2014, 8:43 am

KingofKaboom wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
American,

These tips are experimented and do work to increase your chances of getting replies:

- If you are physically fit and toned, post a shirtless pic in some beach or activity, that attracts their attention. Even the famous user yellowtamarin (long story) who previously opposed to shirtless guys pics changed her mind and is now advocate for shirtless guys (she probably secretly has my shirtless pics on her computer - long story too).

- Don't waste your time to message offline women, message only the "Online Now" and if you are targeting someone in specific and she's offline check again later and message her the first time until she's online. Sending her a message while she's online will make a pop-up appears on her page/app, also women receive tons of messages even while they'er offline so they'll have tons of messages to check the next time they come online.

- if you are chatting (real-time) with someone, reply fast to her IMs, make her hooked to the chat, otherwise she'll be distracted by other guys chatting her.

- As others said, if you are not getting phone/kik/skype in the next 3-4 messages or not leading to a meet up then you're wasting your time.
Awe wish I had a toned fit sexy bod :'(. Ah well the girls I like usually don't care about that. By next year I'll be fit if I keep exercising.


During winter I actually get hit on when I'm out and about a bit, but that's just because I'm wearing layers of heavy clothes and they cant see my waistline. I've made a habit of taking off my coat when talking to a girl and invariably they get a better look at me and wander off without salutation.

Online dating has actually been better so far because they know what they are getting into, so it's not just better for people with great bodies and the motivation to maintain them.


_________________
AQ: 31
Your Aspie score: 135 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 63 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

09 Jan 2014, 3:17 pm

To clarify - I am okay with some shirtless pics taken in the natural settings described above. I'm far from being an advocate for the shirtless pic!

And I didn't change my mind Boo, if you recall, I looked back at the old thread and realised my views were actually the same.

But your shirtless pic is definitely my desktop picture on my home computer, I can't deny that. It's a small version set to "tile" so I can fit as many of you on the screen as possible.



aussiebloke
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,407

09 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm

I'd like to see women shirtless in their profile :wink:


_________________
Theirs a subset of America, adult males who are forgoing ambition ,sex , money ,love ,adventure to sit in a darkened rooms mastering video games - Suicide Bob


leafplant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,222

09 Jan 2014, 4:35 pm

aussiebloke wrote:
I'd like to see women shirtless in their profile :wink:


those are what they call Premium Services :wink:



KC2014
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 21

09 Jan 2014, 5:24 pm

I'm pretty sure a guy from OKC is rejecting me. We had plans to meet up with another member of OKC this weekend. When he saw the profile of the other member and finally a photo of myself, his response was "2 pm is cutting it close. Honestly, looking at his profile, I don't think we have much in common at all. You definitely don't look like how I expected." I asked him to clarify what he meant by my not looking like what he expected since I made no mention as what I look like.



warsend
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 132

09 Jan 2014, 6:02 pm

KC2014 wrote:
I'm pretty sure a guy from OKC is rejecting me. We had plans to meet up with another member of OKC this weekend. When he saw the profile of the other member and finally a photo of myself, his response was "2 pm is cutting it close. Honestly, looking at his profile, I don't think we have much in common at all. You definitely don't look like how I expected." I asked him to clarify what he meant by my not looking like what he expected since I made no mention as what I look like.


I think this is a problem....why are you going with 3 people? Also he accepted a date without knowing what you looked like?



KingofKaboom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,471

09 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm

That caught my attention as well.


_________________
Tacos (optional)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm

Oh mon dieu....ménage à trois.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jan 2014, 6:13 pm

yellowtamarin wrote:
To clarify - I am okay with some shirtless pics taken in the natural settings described above. I'm far from being an advocate for the shirtless pic!

And I didn't change my mind Boo, if you recall, I looked back at the old thread and realised my views were actually the same.

But your shirtless pic is definitely my desktop picture on my home computer, I can't deny that. It's a small version set to "tile" so I can fit as many of you on the screen as possible.


I always knew you're some kind of creep.



aussiebloke
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,407

09 Jan 2014, 6:33 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
To clarify - I am okay with some shirtless pics taken in the natural settings described above. I'm far from being an advocate for the shirtless pic!

And I didn't change my mind Boo, if you recall, I looked back at the old thread and realised my views were actually the same.

But your shirtless pic is definitely my desktop picture on my home computer, I can't deny that. It's a small version set to "tile" so I can fit as many of you on the screen as possible.


I always knew you're some kind of creep.


yeah I thought it was creepy to 8)


_________________
Theirs a subset of America, adult males who are forgoing ambition ,sex , money ,love ,adventure to sit in a darkened rooms mastering video games - Suicide Bob


KC2014
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 21

09 Jan 2014, 6:47 pm

Well, they both live in the same area. One of them (the one that sent the rejection message) doesn't drive, so I had planned on catching the bus out to his area to meet up this weekend. Maybe a day after I had made plans with him, I made plans also with the other person and found out he lives near rejection dude. Both guys are on OKCupid a lot and had also hinted at not having many friends (rejection dude said all his friends had moved away,) so I figured we could all meet at the same time and if it didn't work out with me, they'd at least would have made a new friend in the area. It seemed the most convenient for both of them and also like it'd be fun ... very casual. Is this my AS being clueless?

I would imagine that he's saying that he finds me unattractive. It just seems weird how emphatic the "definitely" was ... like he had a definite idea as to what I looked like despite my not mentioning anything about my physical appearance. I do mention in my profile that I'm not monogamous, so maybe his assumption was that I must be high demand and thus attractive? Unfortunately, I sent a spate of messages to him that made me out to be as neurotic as I actually am. I really have no idea if I'm unattractive, but I'm starting to suspect I must be ... I also sent out my photo to other people I've been chatting with as it'll save both of us time. I had been chatting with rejection dude for two weeks! It is a little disappointing that now a few of them have opened the messages and not responded. I never thought of myself as very pretty, but am I really that bad looking?