the jerk double standard
uhh wow what a great example, no chance ur momma wrongly counted on him only being a super-jerk towards others, but not to her personally.
What was the evidence that he was a "jerk" beforehand?
Can you cite specific instances of him being a "jerk" towards other people?
Can you demonstrate EXACTLY what he said and did that marked him as a "jerk" prior to the incident described?
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Last edited by XFilesGeek on 19 May 2014, 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I was suggesting maybe men complain about being single more than women do. I never said anything about men being "inferior." If you choose to assign that meaning to what I said, fine, but it's a product of your own imagination.
I never claimed to be a "Nice Girl."
Only when they persistently make negative generalizations, and minimize other people's problems. And then act hurt and offended when people challenge their views.
No, I don't think "cry wanks" is a flame, especially when it comes on the heels of a post that persistently makes negative generalizations and minimizes other people's problems.
Negativity is going to breed negativity, and I'm not surprised when people start losing their patience with chronic offenders.
Not really. The term "Nice Guy" is a sarcastic term that means precisely the opposite of what actually counts as "nice." That's why the term "Nice Guy" is usually written in quotation marks. Granted, people who don't understand sarcasm are probably aren't going to get it.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Those are really interesting questions, and I'd love to explore them further. I sometimes wish that WP had a "Gender Issues" sub-forum where we could discuss things like this in-depth and not hijack the L&D forum.
Agreed.
I'm the same way, but I've learned the hard way that some people are just looking to vent.
1. Both genders are allowed to ask whomever they like out in a direct manner.
2. The person asked can say yes or no.
3. Unless there is direct, explicit and enthuastic yes then assume there will be no sex.
4. Do favors for people because you want to help not expect anything in return.
Agreed.
It depends on the words. "Concrete words" are more likely to have a singular definition and a direct meaning, but "abstract words" usually have multiple meanings and depend more on context.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
There's probably nothing more unattractive (in either gender) than always blaming others for whatever is wrong with one's own life.
Nobody has a problem with someone feeling unhappy about not being able to find a meaningful relationship. When it becomes a problem is when that someone starts generally blaming a particular gender for it. If you (the generic "you," not talking to anyone in particular here) cannot be happy with yourself, how can you possibly expect anyone else to be happy with you? And by "happy" I don't mean the steely-jawed martyr, approaching the world knowing it is going to eff you up and taking pleasure from realizing your self-fulfilling prophecy. I mean be happy with who you are. If you don't like who you are, change it.
I was suggesting maybe men complain about being single more than women do. I never said anything about men being "inferior." If you choose to assign that meaning to what I said, fine, but it's a product of your own imagination.
Stop playing games. You know what I meant. You're averse to considering reasons because it detracts from your need to judge all men for complaining about something you consider a non-issue.
I never claimed to be a "Nice Girl."
To the contrary, you're obsession with fighting shows that you are a "Nice Girl" in the sarcastic sense.
No, I don't think "cry wanks" is a flame, especially when it comes on the heels of a post that persistently makes negative generalizations and minimizes other people's problems.
Negativity is going to breed negativity, and I'm not surprised when people start losing their patience with chronic offenders.
So your justification for flaming is "he did it first". Negativity breeds negativity, well there's negativity all around and you're just another breeder. There's no moral high ground here. Don't pretend there is.
Well, you're right: there IS a problem on this sub-forum with people claiming "sexism" where none was originally intended......
Yeah, that's pretty much what I said.
Pointing out the likely outcome of an action is not equivalent to claiming "moral high ground." I simply acknowledge that, after repeatedly being the target of negative generalizations and having one's problems continuously minimized, there's a very good chance that the targeted parties are going to loose their patience (male or female).
It's very well to suggest that everyone should have otherworldly forbearance in all matters relating to interactions with their fellow humans, but, deep within my black, withered heart, I doubt that's possible for most mortals. There's a limit to how many times a person can get punched in the face and keep smiling.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Nobody has a problem with someone feeling unhappy about not being able to find a meaningful relationship. When it becomes a problem is when that someone starts generally blaming a particular gender for it. If you (the generic "you," not talking to anyone in particular here) cannot be happy with yourself, how can you possibly expect anyone else to be happy with you? And by "happy" I don't mean the steely-jawed martyr, approaching the world knowing it is going to eff you up and taking pleasure from realizing your self-fulfilling prophecy. I mean be happy with who you are. If you don't like who you are, change it.
Bingo.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
See if you can derive an operational strategy from my posts above. Perhaps, you can develop into an arrogant inconsiderate self-centered jerk and get the chicks. I tried it once with success. It sounds crazy, but why not leverage your autism. We are already perceived as arrogant, inconsiderate, and self-centered. Adding the jerk part isn't that tough. You can do it! And really, adding the jerk part completes the picture for a successful neurotypical persona. That is, by learning to be a jerk, you might fit in with NTs. They will think you are just another normal jerk.
actual that's How I got my GF(''best lady friend'')back for the
second time.By being a complete douch(jerk)I would just
mock her,and she came back to me.
And she's back with me for the 3rd time.Whenever we ''separate''
I act like ''alpha douche''and whatever reason,she gets
turn on and goes back with me.
appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?
Here's what I imagine happened, based on his posts:
His lady friend leaves him.
Then:
Next:
Then over he comes to WP:
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
See if you can derive an operational strategy from my posts above. Perhaps, you can develop into an arrogant inconsiderate self-centered jerk and get the chicks. I tried it once with success. It sounds crazy, but why not leverage your autism. We are already perceived as arrogant, inconsiderate, and self-centered. Adding the jerk part isn't that tough. You can do it! And really, adding the jerk part completes the picture for a successful neurotypical persona. That is, by learning to be a jerk, you might fit in with NTs. They will think you are just another normal jerk.
actual that's How I got my GF(''best lady friend'')back for the
second time.By being a complete douch(jerk)I would just
mock her,and she came back to me.
And she's back with me for the 3rd time.Whenever we ''separate''
I act like ''alpha douche''and whatever reason,she gets
turn on and goes back with me.
appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?
Here's what I imagine happened, based on his posts:
His lady friend leaves him.
Then:

Next:

Then over he comes to WP:

The gf is too skinny, you need to take her out to dinners more often, bill.
