06 Dec 2015, 11:15 am
06 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
DailyPoutine1 wrote:
rdos wrote:
No, porn hasn't been around for hundreds of years (at least not for typical males). That's pure BS. You also fail to address the point how porn is addictive and in fact diminishes the pleasure of real sex because real sex is typically not as advanced as porn.
.
.
You are making false statements. The edo era in Japan made plenty of paintings depicting explicit sex acts. Basically, you cannot say it wasn't porn.
It's not porn in the modern version of it at least. Besides, I doubt horny guys masturbated to these paintings. Is there any evidence to back that up?
06 Dec 2015, 12:13 pm
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
07 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
Icelandcar wrote:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
It's wrong that you want to illude a girl who wants a relationship only to use her for sex. There are girls that want casual sex without a relationship, you can go for them. I don't see why you want to go after a girl who wants a relationship and hurt her. It's because of guys like you that many women are jaded.
Nah I want more then just sex. Yes I know i'm a horny guy but I also want a companion, i'm lonely. I want not just a lover but a friend. I'd never treat a girl badly, that's not my style. I'd never cheat on a girl ever.
My longing for companionship is more powerful then my longing for sex.
Yet you consider girls objects to be acquired.
Also there is this:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
No I think of girls as slots to put my token into. 
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Makes it hard to believe you'd never treat a girl badly if you would lead her on to think you're not just interested in getting in her pants, when that really is all you wanted with them after all.
07 Dec 2015, 8:43 pm
Sweetleaf wrote:
Icelandcar wrote:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
It's wrong that you want to illude a girl who wants a relationship only to use her for sex. There are girls that want casual sex without a relationship, you can go for them. I don't see why you want to go after a girl who wants a relationship and hurt her. It's because of guys like you that many women are jaded.
Nah I want more then just sex. Yes I know i'm a horny guy but I also want a companion, i'm lonely. I want not just a lover but a friend. I'd never treat a girl badly, that's not my style. I'd never cheat on a girl ever.
My longing for companionship is more powerful then my longing for sex.
Yet you consider girls objects to be acquired.
Also there is this:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
No I think of girls as slots to put my token into.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Makes it hard to believe you'd never treat a girl badly if you would lead her on to think you're not just interested in getting in her pants, when that really is all you wanted with them after all.
Yeah it's clear that he's only after sex and wants to deceive girls into thinking that he loves them when he only wants to sleep with them.
And you know what pisses me off? Many girls want a FWB relationship, I don't know why he doesn't try to be honest about his intentions and go after them instead of wanting to hurt a girl who wants something more than just sex. Also he brags about wanting to deceive them as if it were a good thing.
07 Dec 2015, 9:25 pm
07 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
07 Dec 2015, 9:41 pm
07 Dec 2015, 9:49 pm
rdos wrote:
DailyPoutine1 wrote:
rdos wrote:
No, porn hasn't been around for hundreds of years (at least not for typical males). That's pure BS. You also fail to address the point how porn is addictive and in fact diminishes the pleasure of real sex because real sex is typically not as advanced as porn.
.
.
You are making false statements. The edo era in Japan made plenty of paintings depicting explicit sex acts. Basically, you cannot say it wasn't porn.
It's not porn in the modern version of it at least. Besides, I doubt horny guys masturbated to these paintings. Is there any evidence to back that up?
Haha, I find this funny. You are essentially arguing that sexually explicit materials were not used for sexualpurposes because no one is spelling it out ... And, well since you asked:
From one site but a simple google search will find you more
Some have suggested it was because they were pornography and nothing more. Some have said they served as trousseaus for brides to prepare for their wedding night. Other have suggested that were an aid for masturbation. Masturbation is not equated with sin and weakness like it os the West. And because of husbands were often separated from the wives due to Edo period laws, masturbation was preferred to infidelity.
Source: http://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat20/ ... em695.html
http://figal-sensei.org/hist108/Textbook/ch7.htm
http://www.nippon.com/en/views/b02305/
One is called abuna-e meaning “suggestive” or mildly erotic pictures which may depict, for example, a foot peeking out from under a kimono. The other type, shunga, is a much more blatantly erotic art. Many famous ukiyo-e artists were involved in producing shunga. The beauty of these erotic prints astonished the first Europeans to see them in the late nineteenth century. The writer Edmond de Goncourt wrote in his diary.
The other day I bought some albums of Japanese obscenities. They delight me, amuse me, and charm my eyes, I look on them as being beyond obscenity, which is there, yet seems not to be there, and which I do not see, so completely does it disappear into fantasy… ”
(Edmond et Jules de Goncourt, Journal, Mémoires de la vie littéraire)
I would link an set of art images, but I would because I'm pretty sure that would break some rules or something..
Either way just look up "Shunga" images and you'll find enough of them.
Sorry for the off-topic post though!
07 Dec 2015, 10:19 pm
07 Dec 2015, 10:29 pm
07 Dec 2015, 10:40 pm
08 Dec 2015, 12:12 am
09 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm
Peacesells wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Icelandcar wrote:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
It's wrong that you want to illude a girl who wants a relationship only to use her for sex. There are girls that want casual sex without a relationship, you can go for them. I don't see why you want to go after a girl who wants a relationship and hurt her. It's because of guys like you that many women are jaded.
Nah I want more then just sex. Yes I know i'm a horny guy but I also want a companion, i'm lonely. I want not just a lover but a friend. I'd never treat a girl badly, that's not my style. I'd never cheat on a girl ever.
My longing for companionship is more powerful then my longing for sex.
Yet you consider girls objects to be acquired.
Also there is this:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
No I think of girls as slots to put my token into.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Makes it hard to believe you'd never treat a girl badly if you would lead her on to think you're not just interested in getting in her pants, when that really is all you wanted with them after all.
Yeah it's clear that he's only after sex and wants to deceive girls into thinking that he loves them when he only wants to sleep with them.
And you know what pisses me off? Many girls want a FWB relationship, I don't know why he doesn't try to be honest about his intentions and go after them instead of wanting to hurt a girl who wants something more than just sex. Also he brags about wanting to deceive them as if it were a good thing.
To be fair, I think darkphantomix just loves screwing around with people.
I honestly think that's it. He has a twisted, mocking sense of humor based on love, dating and sex. It's very sarcastic and tongue-in-cheek and he clearly uses it to feel better about himself due to his own lack of success in the dating and sex department.
It probably the reason behind his aggressive and ridiculous statements - he just does it to be controversial and have-a-go at people.
Darkphantomx1, like the others have said, stop all this rubbish, and just go find a woman to have an fwb with. Make your intentions clear from the start, etc.
However, you've probably already tried that and will just whine that you're too short and skinny and all that. Well, i don't know what else to say for you then. Porn it is!
10 Dec 2015, 2:03 am
Outrider wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Icelandcar wrote:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
It's wrong that you want to illude a girl who wants a relationship only to use her for sex. There are girls that want casual sex without a relationship, you can go for them. I don't see why you want to go after a girl who wants a relationship and hurt her. It's because of guys like you that many women are jaded.
Nah I want more then just sex. Yes I know i'm a horny guy but I also want a companion, i'm lonely. I want not just a lover but a friend. I'd never treat a girl badly, that's not my style. I'd never cheat on a girl ever.
My longing for companionship is more powerful then my longing for sex.
Yet you consider girls objects to be acquired.
Also there is this:
darkphantomx1 wrote:
No I think of girls as slots to put my token into.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Rule #161 in the Dating Game Rulebook, make girls think that you don't only care about getting inside their pants.
Makes it hard to believe you'd never treat a girl badly if you would lead her on to think you're not just interested in getting in her pants, when that really is all you wanted with them after all.
Yeah it's clear that he's only after sex and wants to deceive girls into thinking that he loves them when he only wants to sleep with them.
And you know what pisses me off? Many girls want a FWB relationship, I don't know why he doesn't try to be honest about his intentions and go after them instead of wanting to hurt a girl who wants something more than just sex. Also he brags about wanting to deceive them as if it were a good thing.
To be fair, I think darkphantomix just loves screwing around with people.
I honestly think that's it. He has a twisted, mocking sense of humor based on love, dating and sex. It's very sarcastic and tongue-in-cheek and he clearly uses it to feel better about himself due to his own lack of success in the dating and sex department.
It probably the reason behind his aggressive and ridiculous statements - he just does it to be controversial and have-a-go at people.
Darkphantomx1, like the others have said, stop all this rubbish, and just go find a woman to have an fwb with. Make your intentions clear from the start, etc.
However, you've probably already tried that and will just whine that you're too short and skinny and all that. Well, i don't know what else to say for you then. Porn it is!
Actually it's not uncommon that horny people get together with someone and then lose interest after they get what they want. Darkphantomx1 said himself that he has no interest in getting a gf but only in sex, so yeah I think he should find a fwb. Boo explained how to do that very well.
Btw I am not sure if he tried that at all, but I don't think he did. Maybe he can enlighten us on this.
