Serious issues with L&D Forum

Page 7 of 30 [ 473 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 30  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 May 2016, 1:24 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Raleigh wrote:
Super bitter posts should be blotted out by posting pictures of cute cats.

Cats fix everything.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


That's your special interest.



Alliekit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2016
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,182
Location: England

06 May 2016, 2:45 am

YippySkippy wrote:
I second everything B19 has said.

Also, I've noticed that some of the most unhappy/disgruntled male posters from L&D make a regular habit of visiting the Women's Forum, saying things that are upsetting to people there, and then boasting that no one can stop them. They even post in threads where the OP has specifically asked for female responses only. It is abusive behavior.

One more thing I've noticed is that this scenario often occurs (not just in L&D): Person A posts something nasty. Person B makes a nasty response (though often not nearly as nasty as the original comment). Person A reports Person B. Person B's comment is removed, and nothing at all is done about Person A. This encourages Person A to continue this pattern of playing the victim. I think sometimes moderators don't delve far enough into a conversation/situation to see what is really going on. Perhaps there are not enough moderators.

BTW I'm really happy to see Alex addressing this issue.


This is soooooo true!! !! I've had it on my post and been had a go at for wanting women's replies to a topic! It's exhausting and fustrating because you want a safe place to talk to other women



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

06 May 2016, 3:26 am

Personally I support a women only forum, because I think women still experience pressure and being silenced in mixed spaces; society has not yet progressed to a point where a woman speak without what she says being heard through a filter of gendered expectations that have their roots in the still-quite-prevalent assumptions that stem from the earlier male dominated culture and institutions. Men often seem not to realise the impact and reality of gendered presumptions about how women should be, live and express themselves, and the influence of these old inherited and enculturated ideas often seems to operate at a subconscious level, and men are not yet taught to be aware of it. I am not blaming men for this; it's simply where culture is at, at this point in time. Women have made great steps toward equality though there are still residues which function as pressures to inhibit equality of self-expression.

The particular value for women of a women-only space is that women feel less pressured to conform to these old stereotypical ideas of how women should think, perceive and (particularly) express themselves.

I know many men still find this hard to understand, partly because they have no direct experience of the kind of silencing, talking over, ridicule, discrimination and judgment that women in our culture have always experienced, and the impacts of the conservative social and cultural assumptions of paternalism and patriarchal ideas of gendered behaviour are not yet fully behind us at this point in the history of Western culture.

I want women to feel safe on WP and I don't think that is always the case, there is more latent (and sometimes blatant) intimidation than we like to acknowledge as it is an uncomfortable issue for both sexes.



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

06 May 2016, 3:29 am

There's no such thing as a "safe place" on a public forum. Period. The women's forum can't be anything more than a place where the topic is on woman-specific issues. If you want a private area you need to message each other, or set up a chat group on some other place, like Skype for instance.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 May 2016, 3:35 am

Quote:
I know many men still find this hard to understand, partly because they have no direct experience of the kind of silencing, talking over, ridicule, discrimination and judgment that women in our culture have always experienced under social and cultural assumptions of paternalism and patriarchal ideas of gendered behavior


Tell us B19, when is that even happened in the women's forum? Provide concrete examples and let's see if that attitude is that common in there.

Honestly, I had seen ridiculing/judgements/silencing attempts between female users in there and in L&D too (between a user whom her username that starts with N and another user its username starts with W, and between N and H...and between W and...a lot of users)

I agree only with hurtloam here, THIS is the scenario which is more often happening:

Person A says something generalized, Person B is very oversensitive and dramatic, takes the comment too personally and do drama about it and calls Person A bad and sexist.

As for those guys who are making real sexist threads, are being fairly ridiculed by other guys, and those OPs get warned or locked.

I mean, if someone makes a thread 'Men are weird' and she explained why she thinks so, I would just laugh, not offended.

Also using the Report button is more efficient and less stirring.



Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 06 May 2016, 3:57 am, edited 2 times in total.

314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

06 May 2016, 3:43 am

B19 wrote:
I want women to feel safe on WP and I don't think that is always the case, there is more latent (and sometimes blatant) intimidation than we like to acknowledge as it is an uncomfortable issue for both sexes.

I like your goal, but I don't see how having a closed forum for one gender helps to achieve equality.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

06 May 2016, 3:43 am

Personally, I've been trying to avoid L&D for the very reasons that Alex cited.

It's just a few bitter members that cause the problems for everyone else. Dealing directly with those members should alleviate the problem. Is there a way to ban individual members from individual fora? If so, then this tactic could also be applied to those members who trash and troll the Women's Forum too.

Perhaps access to certain forums could be scaled according to number of posts, or granted/denied by consensus of the moderators.

For example, GAD would be reserved as the default forum that is open to everybody.

L&D, PP&R, and WF would be reserved for the "Elite" members, as long as they contribute something other than misandry, misogyny, and bitter rants about how they blame the opposite sex for ignoring them.

Everything else would be reserved for those who have passed their probationary period of X-number of posts.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

06 May 2016, 3:51 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
I think everyone needs to consider a lot of us on the spectrum don't fit in with society that terribly well, not that it's a totally bad thing since society falls short in a lot of ways. I mean people make generalizations about men and women and then sometimes seem to make posts where it seems like they're demanding answers from us autistics as to why typical men or women behave the way they do in dating senerios or whatever. Or they make generalizations about men or women that aren't particularly fitting for those of us on the spectrum and act like it's all men or women who do this or that, basically speaking in absolutes puts people on the defense.


Exactly.

Many of the stereotypical views of men and women are quite prevalent in neurotypical people so there is definitely reason to discuss them. It's quite problematic when many women, and men too (often with feminist ideals) "debunk" these views because of ideological views and their own preferences. It doesn't help in understanding neurodiverse relationship preferences to assign typical NT preferences to "patriarchy".

IMHO, sexism and feminism shouldn't be allowed to be discussed at all in L & D. It's highly off-topic. People can discuss that elsewhere.

Also, I think the forum should be renamed to Love & Relationships. Dating is a NT preference.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

06 May 2016, 3:57 am

Fnord wrote:
L&D, PP&R, and WF would be reserved for the "Elite" members, as long as they contribute something other than misandry, misogyny, and bitter rants about how they blame the opposite sex for ignoring them.

Everything else would be reserved for those who have passed their probationary period of X-number of posts.


Strongly object to the idea that L&D would not be open to new (non-elite) members. Threads about relationship issues posted by new members are often the most interesting topics here.



Drawyer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,860
Location: Away

06 May 2016, 3:58 am

Personally I fail to see any problems on L&D forum. Really.


_________________
"Embrace the glorious mess that you are."


Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

06 May 2016, 3:59 am

Fnord wrote:
It's just a few bitter members that cause the problems for everyone else. Dealing directly with those members should alleviate the problem. Is there a way to ban individual members from individual fora? If so, then this tactic could also be applied to those members who trash and troll the Women's Forum too.


it seems like that's the case. and no, there are currently no mod tools to block a member from accessing one particular forum.

those would be very useful to have, the current workaround we find ourselves doing hardly leaves many satisfied.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

06 May 2016, 3:59 am

B19 wrote:
Personally I support a women only forum, because I think women still experience pressure and being silenced in mixed spaces; society has not yet progressed to a point where a woman speak without what she says being heard through a filter of gendered expectations that have their roots in the still-quite-prevalent assumptions that stem from the earlier male dominated culture and institutions. Men often seem not to realise the impact and reality of gendered presumptions about how women should be, live and express themselves, and the influence of these old inherited and enculturated ideas often seems to operate at a subconscious level, and men are not yet taught to be aware of it. I am not blaming men for this; it's simply where culture is at, at this point in time. Women have made great steps toward equality though there are still residues which function as pressures to inhibit equality of self-expression.

The particular value for women of a women-only space is that women feel less pressured to conform to these old stereotypical ideas of how women should think, perceive and (particularly) express themselves.

I know many men still find this hard to understand, partly because they have no direct experience of the kind of silencing, talking over, ridicule, discrimination and judgment that women in our culture have always experienced, and the impacts of the conservative social and cultural assumptions of paternalism and patriarchal ideas of gendered behaviour are not yet fully behind us at this point in the history of Western culture.

I want women to feel safe on WP and I don't think that is always the case, there is more latent (and sometimes blatant) intimidation than we like to acknowledge as it is an uncomfortable issue for both sexes.


Feminism and "patriarchy" has absolutely no relevance here, and I think you are derailing the thread.



Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

06 May 2016, 4:05 am

Drawyer wrote:
Personally I fail to see any problems on L&D forum. Really.


bless you, drawyer. 8)

Fnord wrote:
Perhaps access to certain forums could be scaled according to number of posts, or granted/denied by consensus of the moderators.

L&D, PP&R, and WF would be reserved for the "Elite" members, as long as they contribute something other than misandry, misogyny, and bitter rants about how they blame the opposite sex for ignoring them.

Everything else would be reserved for those who have passed their probationary period of X-number of posts.


consider that a good portion of members join the site seeking help for love/relationship related issues relating to ASD. like myself.

restricting them from accessing it right away could potentially be very discouraging or unhelpful. i propose that they may be able to submit their post and have it be approved by a mod using the post approval tool we do have, but have never used once. then mods can see if it is a legitimate inquiry or plea, etc, or just inflammatory and judge.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 May 2016, 4:07 am

rdos wrote:
Fnord wrote:
L&D, PP&R, and WF would be reserved for the "Elite" members, as long as they contribute something other than misandry, misogyny, and bitter rants about how they blame the opposite sex for ignoring them.

Everything else would be reserved for those who have passed their probationary period of X-number of posts.


Strongly object to the idea that L&D would not be open to new (non-elite) members. Threads about relationship issues posted by new members are often the most interesting topics here.


Yes, a new user can be a good person, while an Elite old user may turn nasty. You can't evaluate people based on post count only, besides that won't stop a sexist newcomer to spit sexist stuff on the General forum.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 May 2016, 4:10 am

rdos wrote:
B19 wrote:
Personally I support a women only forum, because I think women still experience pressure and being silenced in mixed spaces; society has not yet progressed to a point where a woman speak without what she says being heard through a filter of gendered expectations that have their roots in the still-quite-prevalent assumptions that stem from the earlier male dominated culture and institutions. Men often seem not to realise the impact and reality of gendered presumptions about how women should be, live and express themselves, and the influence of these old inherited and enculturated ideas often seems to operate at a subconscious level, and men are not yet taught to be aware of it. I am not blaming men for this; it's simply where culture is at, at this point in time. Women have made great steps toward equality though there are still residues which function as pressures to inhibit equality of self-expression.

The particular value for women of a women-only space is that women feel less pressured to conform to these old stereotypical ideas of how women should think, perceive and (particularly) express themselves.

I know many men still find this hard to understand, partly because they have no direct experience of the kind of silencing, talking over, ridicule, discrimination and judgment that women in our culture have always experienced, and the impacts of the conservative social and cultural assumptions of paternalism and patriarchal ideas of gendered behaviour are not yet fully behind us at this point in the history of Western culture.

I want women to feel safe on WP and I don't think that is always the case, there is more latent (and sometimes blatant) intimidation than we like to acknowledge as it is an uncomfortable issue for both sexes.


Feminism and "patriarchy" has absolutely no relevance here, and I think you are derailing the thread.


Besides, this thread is for L&D.

Btw B19, I would reply the same if you were a man, do not take all this as 'mansplaining' - because I know you probably would take it like that.



TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

06 May 2016, 5:01 am

I think we should use this thread for what it was intended for and not as an opportunity to vent or fulfil other agendas.

I honestly think most of the problems in L&D can be fixed with stricter moderation tools. Unfortunately those do not seem to be available....seriously Alex, even basic and free forums offer these tools!! Is it a case of money? I'm sure we could all pitch in. What is the obstacle here exactly?

Until a more advanced set of forum tools and heck different forum type comes in I think it's safe to say the only other alternative to alleviating problems here is stricter moderation and more rules. In short - thanks to the minority who are ruining it for everyone else. :P


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.