Men's thread:when she never initiates communication
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia
But you have to understand about the approaching men for hundreds of years we have been told approaching men is unladylike and whorish. In the olden days approaching a man was seen as 'loose'.
There is still a bit of a stigma around it. I know in secondary if I ever approached boy to ask him out I wad bullied and teased for being too upfront and desperate. Also have you seen how NT men react, they are almost insulted because you are too forward.
I am not convinced.
But in my experience, the women who initiate are always the ones who turn out to be interested, and the ones who never initiate, including the ones who reply enthusiastically, always turn out not interested.
I trust my experience more.
Take a step back, read what has been said here and try to see it from other peoples perspective.
It has always been the women who did the initiating. It's always a look, a glance or some body language that indicates to the guy that she wants him to ask her out.
It's seen as taboo for a guy to ask a girl out without the girl first signalling in this way. If a guy asks a girl out without the girl signalling, he's seen a creep.
This has been drilled into guys since time immemorial.
I'd like to see a cultural shift that allows men to be the initiators without being looked down on.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
No, they do initiate at times: when they are interested.
If not, they never initiate.
Anyway that was a low blow.
Get out of my thread please.
I see. Carry on with your experiment you perfect specimen of the male species. Last piece of advice "Get out of my thread please" when you hear what you don't want to, can turn any internet veteran into a troll. I was seriously trying to be nice. I am on the spectrum after all. I tell it like I see it.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia
No, they do initiate at times: when they are interested.
If not, they never initiate.
Anyway that was a low blow.
Get out of my thread please.
I see. Carry on with your experiment you perfect specimen of the male species. Last piece of advice "Get out of my thread please" when you hear what you don't want to, can turn any internet veteran into a troll. I was seriously trying to be nice. I am on the spectrum after all. I tell it like I see it.
Are you comparing all males to Boo? Please don't.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
No, they do initiate at times: when they are interested.
If not, they never initiate.
Anyway that was a low blow.
Get out of my thread please.
I see. Carry on with your experiment you perfect specimen of the male species. Last piece of advice "Get out of my thread please" when you hear what you don't want to, can turn any internet veteran into a troll. I was seriously trying to be nice. I am on the spectrum after all. I tell it like I see it.
Well, I didn't like your tone at all in both posts. Too aggressive, you first imply I am repulsive to women, then implying to be compared with fuckboys (what's a fuckboy anyway?); and now you call me a males' specimen.
You fail miserably at sounding nice - so kindly stop it.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia
No, they do initiate at times: when they are interested.
If not, they never initiate.
Anyway that was a low blow.
Get out of my thread please.
I see. Carry on with your experiment you perfect specimen of the male species. Last piece of advice "Get out of my thread please" when you hear what you don't want to, can turn any internet veteran into a troll. I was seriously trying to be nice. I am on the spectrum after all. I tell it like I see it.
Well, I didn't like your tone at all in both posts. Too aggressive, you first imply I am repulsive to women, then implying to be compared with fuckboys (what's a fuckboy anyway?); and now you call me a males' specimen.
You fail miserably at sounding nice - so kindly stop it.
Repulsive is a really strong word to use there. Interest is a fleeting emotion. You're debating interest not dateability, right?. It's easy to become uninterested in someone even if they're not a bad person.
I am aggressive per se, I'm a 27 year old punker that's had two suicide attempts and a narcissistic mother on my back for most of my life. Add to that I started working at the age of 6 and worked until I could prove I needed disability at 22 with no real treatment for my spectrum disorders until around 23. This "aggressive" nature is the norm in the real world. Add to that I've been knocked out twice in sports, broken a few bones and bike around 100 miles a month no matter the weather. To me being nice is not coddling someone but having genuine concern for their happiness and well being. Seriously, I'm trying to be nice lol.
I didn't compare you to fuckboys I was explaining why some women have bad communication skills. Fuckboy isn't a term to explain men women don't like, it's a subculture of guys who think they're cooler than they really are. That use being a jerk as a means to psychologically control women, they get laid on the regular and brag on not using contraception etc. An exaggeration of the badboy but much more demanding and materialistic. I wouldn't be surprised if most of them grow up to be wife beaters.
Sad thing is is that girls who are raised that pleasing men is the road to happiness don't know any better and by time they get to you they're jaded and such. This theory applies to both genders though. A female version of the fuckboy would be a slut right?.
I am not a cool kid but I hang around cool kids because of skateboarding, drinking etc. I'm just adding my two cents.
Rant over
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The way I understood is thread is most so much a thread about women as a thread about men holding on to a non-reciprocal relationship, which is an oxymoron.
This works both ways though, it is a statement of the obvious and not gender specific. People can get fixated and in denial. However this is infatuation.
Most people are fully of capable of understanding that lack of reciprocation does not equal a relationship, but in the same token are capable of entering into denial.
This works both ways though, it is a statement of the obvious and not gender specific. People can get fixated and in denial. However this is infatuation.
Most people are fully of capable of understanding that lack of reciprocation does not equal a relationship, but in the same token are capable of entering into denial.
+1
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
This works both ways though, it is a statement of the obvious and not gender specific. People can get fixated and in denial. However this is infatuation.
Most people are fully of capable of understanding that lack of reciprocation does not equal a relationship, but in the same token are capable of entering into denial.
I disagree.
I strongly think that is way more likely to happen to guys; hence why it's more of a men-problem (not exclusively).
Why?
Because like most women are admitting here, guys are socially expected to initiate more often, right? They said it themselves.
Therefore, since are guys are socially conditioned in that way and more expected from them to initiate communications/stuff, then they are way more likely to fail to see the non-reciprocation. Many guys don't take the never-initiation from women as a sign of non-interest; and so the guy keeps initiating and initiating and initiating.... like a miserable lapdog...for a a long time with no romance results.
This is a very common men problem we see in boards all the time. It is probably one of the most common romance problems for men and it's way costly emotionally and time wise.
For women, generally, don't have this particular problem : their problem instead is more likely about waiting, waiting is the hard part for them but if she really likes the guy, she will send a test thing - but if he never initiates even after that then eventually they assume that he's not interested. End of Story. Simple. Men need to learn to see it that way, that the never-initiating = no interest.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 15 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Some men responses on this matter over the internet, I was surprised that so many other men think like on this (but not the majority, which is sad for the men):
It has been two weeks and we have met about 3-4 times and regularly text. But she never initiates meetings. I have to contact her always but she always readily agrees. She is a bit awkward in person but is quite open when texting.
Usually I have to initiate the conversation, always have to ask questions. She just freakin responds. Rarely asks questions. Only initial text messages contain good morning. After my response there is a nothing.
I feel like this is going nowhere. Any advice?
The chit about just responding during convo, welcome to majority of women, no fukin personality. Makes you a good communicator though! Perceive it as practice but know that these relationships end up boring as the only time you talk is when you say something.
Don't contact her as often (every 2-3 days), look for a way to make fun of her lack of initiating, hint there are other women in the picture without saying it, ensure she has a good time in your presence and it should improve things for you.
Go NC right now.
You sound too clingy, needy and have too much free time. She senses this.
Result:
She sent me a teasing message about valentine's day the same night. Her conversation seemed like she wanted me to ask her out. So i did. We are deciding on the day as I am out of town on valentine's day. Sucks, I know.
Result 2:
Edit: I guess she just needed some time to come out of her comfort zone.
From another website:
I know a girl can be shy and she might not start a convo the first couple of times , so I may start it the first couple of times but then I expect her to start a convo else I would feel like a Jerk...
That' s ME..
From another website:
Question: She never initiates our conversations. Should I stop talking to her?
Replies:
Look, no friendship or relationship can work if one person makes the effort and the other person doesn't. There was a girl like this at university. I would always stop and talk to her. Then I was having a bad week and she never came up and talked to me. After that I only ever said hello when I saw her and never stopped to talk.
She even asked her friends why I wasn't talking to her. She could never work out that all had to for a conversation is to stop and talk to me. I was always friendly to her and she could have talked to me at any time. But she didn't.
Now imagine if we were closer friends or something more?
From another website:
Thread: (Guy ranting about girl who replies long text but NEVER initiates...)
Come on now, isn't it obvious?
You're clearly misreading the situation into thinking she is interested, when in actuality it sounds as if she just enjoys flirting.
Enjoying flirting =/= enjoying you.
Now, don't read too much into my cynicism. It doesn't mean she can't become interested, but you should be wary of the possibility that she is just flirting with you because you're there....with no other ulterior motive. If a girl messages me, I usually respond back, even in a flirty manner (even if they aren't single...) just because. I don't have an interest in pursuing them, but hey, it's fun.
On the other hand, initiating conversation can be an indicator of interest, but it's not 100%. Recently my ex started messaging me a lot. She's been posting stuff on my wall almost daily, and pretty much IMs me every time I log on. This came all of a sudden after being on non-speaking terms for over half a year since our break up. I'm kind of wary because a) she broke up with me, and I fell in love with her (something I don't say lightly), so the break up was especially hard on me. Took me about half a year to get over her, and b) she currently has a boyfriend.
But wait, she initiates conversation with me 9 out of 10 times. Doesn't that mean she is interested? Not exactly.
My advice TC? Just ask her out on a date. Regardless of how she responds, it'll remove the doubt you're obsessing about. But before you do I'd wait and not talk to her for a few days. Not to see if she tries to initiate or anything, but just so you don't seem too eager.
RESULT:
She just said "CHRIS!" and isn't doing too much to fuel the conversation, but she initiated it. So we're just BS talking now.
Now I'm struggling to come up with a segue from smalltalk to a date... that sounds dumb, but the context of this conversation is hard to work with. Any ideas?
I told ThisAdamGuy to hold it and it worked for him; but it's him who ended the relationship later.
Hold it for a while, if she never initiates, and see if she does! Always do it.
