Why are women grossed out by the male body?

Page 7 of 14 [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next

rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

12 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm

AngelRho wrote:
rdos wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
PatrickJane wrote:
I believe it is a cultural thing. In ancient greek it was the other way around. The male body was considered the pinnacle of beauty.

Yep. And they were totally into pederasty, too.

Doesn't make it right.


There is no wrong or right in that area. It's all about attitudes that differ from culture to culture.

So you're perfectly ok with men abusing their positions of trust and authority to have sexual relationships with young boys? Interesting...


Not really, but there is more to it than that.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

12 Aug 2017, 5:18 pm

rdos wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
rdos wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
PatrickJane wrote:
I believe it is a cultural thing. In ancient greek it was the other way around. The male body was considered the pinnacle of beauty.

Yep. And they were totally into [redacted], too.

Doesn't make it right.


There is no wrong or right in that area. It's all about attitudes that differ from culture to culture.

So you're perfectly ok with men abusing their positions of trust and authority to have [redacted]? Interesting...


Not really, but there is more to it than that.

There are quite a few men in the national [offensive] registry (and women, too, I'm sure) who would say the same thing.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

12 Aug 2017, 10:12 pm

Cat calling is ALWAYS aggressive. Try talking to women about it, rather than making armchair philosophy. It is nothing like flirting.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Aaendi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 363

12 Aug 2017, 11:11 pm

Flirting and catcalling is still subjective. It's only catcalling when the woman doesn't like it.



SilverBoltsisWmax
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2017
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 245
Location: South Carolina

12 Aug 2017, 11:26 pm

Aaendi wrote:
Flirting and catcalling is still subjective. It's only catcalling when the woman doesn't like it.


Agreed.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

13 Aug 2017, 12:18 am

Dream on.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

13 Aug 2017, 1:49 am

jrjones9933 wrote:
Cat calling is ALWAYS aggressive. Try talking to women about it, rather than making armchair philosophy. It is nothing like flirting.


Read the research article. There were many women in the study that didn't find catcalling disgusting, and many that didn't get afraid, although it was more common among NTs.

Besides, there is a thin line between cat calling and trying to get the attention of a woman a guy is interested in. Cat calling simply fits pretty well into the normal courtship behavior of NTs.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

13 Aug 2017, 1:51 am

Whatever. Go ahead and reinforce these absurd ideas. Less competition for me. More moaning on the boards about how women treat them so unfairly, but it will barely move the needle.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

13 Aug 2017, 2:02 am

rdos wrote:

Not peer reviewed or published. N>3,000, which looks promising, but the quiz was taken online from a variety of unspecified sources. I doubt it will pass peer review or get published, despite being exciting reading. There's no way to know how many of the "women" who took the quiz actually identify as women, or have lady parts.

Researchgate bills itself as a social networking site for scientists. They can post drafts of papers, and seek collaborators for research. Nothing there should be taken as part of the book, yet. I don't think I'd want to work with this guy.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


RightGalaxy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,145

13 Aug 2017, 4:02 am

It's not the body part that grossed her out. It was the act of that pervert exposing himself. Exhibitionism is a mental illness that applies to all genders.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

13 Aug 2017, 4:14 am

jrjones9933 wrote:
Not peer reviewed or published.


It's been on peer-review several times, and the reason it was not published was because it was too controversial for the journals involved, and not because of flaws in the study, which the peer-reviewers couldn't point out. Rather, they simply disliked the research as it challenged their long-held theories and prejudices.

jrjones9933 wrote:
N>3,000, which looks promising, but the quiz was taken online from a variety of unspecified sources.


The quiz has been both peer-reviewed and published, so that is not valid.

jrjones9933 wrote:
I doubt it will pass peer review or get published, despite being exciting reading. There's no way to know how many of the "women" who took the quiz actually identify as women, or have lady parts.


Now you are just being silly. :roll:

People selected their gender long before they were asked about flashing. In fact, the question about flashing was mixed-up with normal autistic questions, only given to women, and participants primarily did Aspie Quiz to see if they had autistic traits. IOW, getting this survey was completely unexpected. Additionally, there was no direct link to the survey, rather, people had to fill out 100+ questions in Aspie Quiz first.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Aug 2017, 7:06 am

rdos wrote:
SilverBoltsisWmax wrote:
I get triggered when people say this. I think Cat-calling is a case by case thing. It's typically offensive based on when and how you do it, but if you are considered attractive to someone I think it's taken as just another method of flirting. One of those double standard things if you will.


Of course. Both cat calling and flashing can be aggressive, but typically, none of them are. Both are indeed similar to flirting. It's just that in Western culture, we think that dating is the only valid way to pursue a relationship. It's so entrenched in our thinking so we use "dating" as a general term for all kinds of ways to get into relationships, regardless if there is any real dating or not.


Cat-calling and flashing are almost always aggressive.

:roll:


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Aaendi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 363

13 Aug 2017, 10:58 am

jrjones9933 wrote:
Whatever. Go ahead and reinforce these absurd ideas. Less competition for me. More moaning on the boards about how women treat them so unfairly, but it will barely move the needle.


If a guy says "You're cute" to a girl, how would you know what the guy is thinking?



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Aug 2017, 5:20 pm

Aaendi wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Whatever. Go ahead and reinforce these absurd ideas. Less competition for me. More moaning on the boards about how women treat them so unfairly, but it will barely move the needle.


If a guy says "You're cute" to a girl, how would you know what the guy is thinking?


I would take, "You're cute," as a compliment.

"Nice ass, b***h," is not.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

13 Aug 2017, 7:19 pm

Context matters. "You're cute" comes across differently when offered deferentially by a person standing nearby, than when shouted across a parking lot.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

14 Aug 2017, 4:36 am

XFilesGeek wrote:
I would take, "You're cute," as a compliment.


Not if he shouted it at you. Neither if he had a knife in his hand. Or if he was very ugly. Compliments are only words and need to be related to the situation.

XFilesGeek wrote:
"Nice ass, b***h," is not.


I'd bet some women would take it as a compliment if it was said by somebody super-attractive.