Male disposability in life & dating

Post Reply New Topic

Look I am not underestimating that, I even feel that myself when I walk past groups of muslim migrants late at nigh by myself, I feel the very real danger that they could seriously injure me if they wanted to. I was also perfectly willing to concede that it was part of the equation.

But like I said, this is subconscious, it's not something women think. When a woman sees a man interacting with other females she simply feels that he might be a good mate, based on the fact that he is getting female attention(social proof that he has value). If she sees that other women value him, then she herself will percieve him as higher value too.

Please stop the long post chain and reply to each other as:

@Chronos blah blah blah

@ClosetGenius blah blah blah

Any actual evidence to back that up?

Yes. I'm viewing this on mobile and the first 2 threads quoted are just a column of letters now lol.

Yes, yes it's the case, this phenomena exists among females in other animals too.

And in your species as well...

http://www.prweb.com/releases/matepoach ... 744454.htm

There is always the case for an odd bird. But two things affect this, one being overweight, two asking guys who already have tons of control over how women view therefore they can be extremely picky. I have to say I find it hard to believe you actually have always failed with non self aware guys.

If that's the reason for their preference their reason is stupid, because if they actually get the man even though he has a girlfriend that only shows that he's not all that able to commit.

Ugh. That's the main issue. The idea you are special. This is why redrill exists to help men. Women as a result of biological reasons and society pampering them in ways causes them to never be self aware or grow.

How women view attractive men on average is a joke. It can be easily controlled. You want a top tier man k. Build him it's not hard but women want a finished project that is out a their control.

Remember pikemon? The sooner level 50 trainers stop trying to have level 80- 100 charizards the better.

Oh and this may sound biased but men can go to level 150 while women stop at 100. This is due to how the world works.

Are you trying to use logic to explain their behavior? It's futile.
Your brain is probably 'male' then lol.

Btw this is something a lot of us men notice and experience in our lives.
Especially when comparing the female attention we're getting in our single life vs recent relationship life.
Actually, it's very noticeable that when a girl is sexually attracted to me (aka finds me very attractive) - she always assumes I am a "Playboy".

Hell, even my current gf assumed so.

Umm in a lot of places throughout history, women wouldn't have been allowed the opportunity to become those things...so that is actually why historically most notable scientists, doctors, inventors, artists ect were males. Women have largely been seen as baby makers to be kept inside throughout history. so that is not a very good argument.

Where are all the successful female scientists, engineers, doctors etc. Today since women in many countries now have more freedom and opportunity?

Ayn Rand, the only example I can think of right now released her philosophical/political books before women had equal rights.

Read my post agai . I already said this but loks like I have to repeat it again.

Where are they?

Name 5 notable female doctors, scientists. Inventors, philosophers, etc. In the last 100 years.

I can only think of two, Ayn Rand and one who's name I forgot, she is the leading sciescientist robotics research in Japan I think.

Because these things take time, lol you honestly think after thousands of years of history, women gaining more freedom and opportunities is going to result in just as many well known female inventors/artists/scientists and such coming into existence within 100 years? Not to mention just because this freedom/oppurtunities have been granted in the past 100 years doesn't mean all the old attitudes and mentalities just instantly went away and everyone started encouraging women to pursue these more stereotypical 'male' professions.

Last 100 years, so Lise Meitner still counts. Someone she worked together with won a Nobel price. I don't think she did but he thought she should have got one too for their combined work.
Rosalind Franklin (worked together with Watson and Crick - DNA double helix)
More recently, I don't know her name but the CRISPR gene editing method, which might be the most important gene editing method today, was developed by a woman.

There are more, but I don't know a lot about famous people.
You're right that there are more important male scientists also recently but not right that important female scientists are almost non-existant.

Would your friends dat a non college educated man working part time at min wage? If not it’s their standards that keep them single not that menarent interested in them. I here so many women b***h about being single and how no men will date them or how there’s no men or where are all the men, but they won’t date men like me. So I don’t have pity for them anymore then I would someone who says they dehydrated and going die while I’m offering them water cause they won’t drink water and only want soda.
I’m single cause women reject me left and right not because I don’t deem half the female population good enough to date me.

Your lack of knowledge on the subject does not equate to lack of existence...believe it or not, a large number of people in Japan think that only Japan has four seasons.

1. Emmy Noether. It's often said that Hilbert was the only person to know all of math, and Einstein was the god of physics, but there was one person who Einstein and Hilbert turned to when they needed help, and that was Emmy Noether. Einstein was able to start his theory of relativity but not able to complete, nor was Hilbert or any of the other male physicists and mathematicians of the time. It was Emmy Noether who made sense of it and completed it. To underscore the importance of this, consider that Einstein is famous for his E=mc^2 equation, but he didn't start the derivation. Others did. What Einstein did was finish the derivation and made it something understandable became famous for it, but despite the fact that Noether did the same thing with Einstein's theory of relativity, you still have never heard of her or understand her importance. That's not really your fault though. Noether would likely be as well known today as Einstein and Hilbert, Newton and so on, if not for the fact that she was female. Being female, she was unable to study at any universities in Germany...the seat of science at the time, but was permitted to sit in on courses which she was not permitted to receive credit for. Being female, she was also not permitted to teach in any official capacity at universities in Germany, and thus did was not able to obtain the authority and recognition that comes with professorship that Einstein and others did, but she was eventually permitted to do so on a volunteer basis with the help of extremely persistent advocacy from Hilbert, Einstein and others who recognized her talents as equal to or exceeding their own.

2. Lisa Randall. Randall is a leading expert in cosmology at Harvard University.

3. Grace Hopper
Grace Hopper was a pioneer in computer science and creator of one of the first programming languages, FLOW-MATIC. She is an extremely influential figure in computer sciences and her ideas inspired the programming language COBOL, which is still used today in banking.

4. Marie Curie. First woman to win a Nobel Prize, and two time Nobel Prize winner for her contributions to the field of science in radioactive physics with her theory of radioactivity. Coiner of the term "radioactivity", discoverer of the elements polonium and radium, and first to apply radiation to the treatment of cancer.

5. Rosalind Franklin. Rosalind Franklin had been using x-ray crystalography to study the structure of DNA, and while James Watson, Francis Crick, who worked in a different lab at the same institution, King's College, were given credit for discovering that the structure of DNA was a helix, and awarded the Nobel Prize for it, it's widely believed that they came to this conclusion after one of them got a peak at Franklin's lab journal. This view has been strengthened by the fact that Watson eventually went on to express that ideally, Franklin should have been awarded the prize as well. Unfortunately Franklin died at the age of 37 from ovarian cancer and the Nobel Prize committee does not award the honor posthumously. Her friend Anne Sayre wrote a book detailing the sexism that Franklin and other women faced at King's College.

6. Hedy Lamarr. Hedy Lamarr was not a scientist. She was a silver screen actress from the golden era of Hollywood. But that didn't stop her from inventing Frequency-hopping spread spectrum missile guidance systems to torpedo the crap out of nazis. Lamarr's contributions are used heavily in modern warfare and communications today. She also worked on many other inventions.

7. Chien-Shiung Wu. Wu is known for her contributions to the Manhattan Project, where she helped develop the process of seperating uranium metal into uranium-235 and uranium-238 isotopes by gaseous diffusion, and also for the "Wu Experiment" which contradicted the hypothetical law of conservation of parity, which won two of her colleagues the Novel Prize. The reason that Wu was not awarded the prize is largely lost to what has been called the politics and complexities of how the Nobel Prize is awarded, and the actual reason is debatable and one we will never really know, but she was recognized in other ways with various other awards.

I am going to stop listing them independently and stop here due to time constraints, but you can find a list of female Nobel Prize winners here. You will see that many women win them in the biological sciences and medicine.

Speaking of medicine, at one of the largest health care providers in southern California, UCLA, 1284 of the 2692 doctors are female, roughly 48% and I would say they are rather successful as that institution pays very their physicians very well. 34% of the doctors in the U.S. are female.

A word on notariety and Nobel Prizes: While most who get their names mentioned in text books, are household names, and who have awarded Nobel Prizes have done great things, not everyone who does great things gets such recognition for it, and not everyone who gets recognition for it has actually done a great thing. The foundation of all technological breakthroughs are the contributions of countless people who work long hours and who have dedicated their lives to sometimes, obscure fields, who never get credit for their work. It's very common that when a research lab makes a breakthrough, the bulk of the credit goes to the "principal investigator" who is the professor who's lab it is, and not the people who actually did the work. Women have historically been disproportionately affected by this because though they once dominated lab populations as both technicians and scientists, they were blocked from holding professorships and holding director and thus could not have labs of their own, and their contributions were taken for granted or not recognized for their value.





This may have seemed like a long time ago to you, but with respect to how fast perceptions actually change, it really isn't, and despite advances in equality of women in science, we still have to deal with perceptions such as yours, that ignore our contributions to the field, as well as ongoing sexism that blocks us from receiving full credit for our merit. In the past 4 years I've experience two incidents of sexism. One in where a man only addressed my male associate while ignoring me, and another where two young men where completely disregarding my input, experience, and expertise, with disastrous results. And that's only the past 4 years. One should not have to content with the constant devaluing that women in STEM are often subjected to, but it's an unfortunate fact of our world that it happens.

To illustrate this, consider the idea that few women go into STEM. This is not true. Few women go into EM. Engineering and Mathematics. As for ST, science and technology, that includes biological sciences, life sciences, chemistry, pharmacology and medicine, and women are 50% of even dominate some of those fields and much of the research churned out in those fields is done by women, but people are either unaware of that or ignore it when talking about STEM as if those women don't count.