Gonna try acting like a dick towards NT party girls

Post Reply New Topic

Yeah, agreed that its a lot of things at the same time. Like we were talking about in the shyness thread, I think nurture has a lot to do with whether people adhere directly to the evolutionary stuff or not. Some people chose to make the effort, some don't, when the people who don't make the effort have kids it means that their kids will have grown up with either those values, once in a while going in the opposite direction if they're parents were really bad enough, but usually when people have bad attitudes and find that bad attitude makes right in a machievellian sense a lot of times its very difficult for them to find a reason not to go with their basic side. Just like you'll find very alpha people who were raised with better parents and prefer to have class you also have all kinds of people who really want likeness of values or complimentary/opposite strengths out of a partner - something that usually rides over and above core theory. Still, I think the people who get shelled out by core eugenic/genetic theory will tend to find that its the first line in the sand and if you can't make it past that line you'll have a heck of a time making it happen. Not that there's no hope, they'll just have to go to some crazy ends to improve themselves and put more work into it than most people could even dream of.



There's nothing wrong with the positive at all, its there just as much as the negative and it needs to be talked about. I think what happens is negative comes out more because it has more sway over a person's life, wanting to prevent it, wanting to know how to deal with it, and that's the support angle of the forums.

I'm pretty quick to call it misogyny when it IS misogyny.

Did you actually look at that ladder theory site? It's just dripping with hatred and contempt for women.

Using "ho" or "b***h" as a synonym for "woman" is hateful, too.

Well, while I agree that the bottom line point is a piece of reality I *would* like to knock the writer's teeth back after reading how he phrased some of that. If its biological its biological, its to a degree no fault and more the fault of society condoning people to run from reality (like my roommate, lots of people run full force sprint - enough to get themselves winded practically - toward temptation rather than thinking about what its really worth in the long term and where it puts them).

If you just want p****, then do whatever you gotta do to get some. But lose the NT hating attitude, there's enough NT hating here.

Here be p****.

Really? Wow, I need to move to Mississippi:) Just kidding lol.

Well, I like that you realize it's not about being a jerk.

Did you know that studies have indicated that people who fit popular notions of beauty are also (on average) more impatient and rude than others? I found that interesting. Wish I could remember the source.

I think its because they can skate by with so much more, fewer ego checks quite often means less learned self-restraint.

I wonder if there is a divide based on how long one has been good-looking. I suspect that those who are good-looking but have not been so throughout their entire lives would be kinder than those who have always looked good and are thus used to being treated well because of it.

Just a little p****

Results??!?! RESULTS??

I second this question. Don't worry, we will not ill-judge you, we just want to know how your plan went. Surely, you must have at least learned some valuable knowledge which you can impart unto us, no?

So; your going to get a bunch of younger girls that you met on myspace drunk so that you can have sex with them?

That sounds like a rape crime to me.

While I will not disagree that this whole thread is REALLY funny; you have no right to take advantage of younger women.

And yes- Finding random girls on myspace and acting like they are "HOoooooes for shooooo" is taking advantage of them.

This is a one-sided argument and you sir are at the losing end.

The truth of this statement is extremely flawed.

Uh-hum, I've looked at your Myspace page and you call yourself the "Emo Ninja" and you use to put up how you described yourself as great because you have blond hair. No wonder you have a MySpace page in the first place.

Go Figure.

The fact of the matter is that there is a 99.99999998 percentage chance that you are no different from any other guy. You have just probably most likely have never gotten laid.

The way i see there are 2 types of guys in the world: The Do's and the Dont's. Each make up about 50% of the general population.

The Do's: These are the guys who get with girls. Sure; not all there methods may be the most ethical but they do indeed work. These are the type of guys who will come to the intent of going to a party and getting laid with drunk girls. It may be unethical, it may be un-compassionate, but in the end it does work. These guys are seen as "jerks" because they are seen to take advantage of women. Though I would argue that any women who puts herself in such a position is ASKING HERSELF to be taken advantage of. I'm not going to argue about that; it is also a one-sided argument; end of line.


The Don'ts: Ironically, these guys are so much different than the Do's. While they are seen as the much "nicer" type of guy than the do's and they will usually pursue a much more golden path. They won't hit on the girl who is the party girl(Who would be easy), the pretty girl, or anything like that. They try to find the nicer girl but uh-hum as far as I know unless you are asexual everyone has a sex drive.


And there are also two types of girls. I am going to label them as the Do's and the Dont's also.
As with the males; each make up about 50% of the general population.

The Do's: These are the girls who go to the party and get drunk and get taken advantage by the guys. Though in the end they sort of want to be taken advantage of or else they wouldn't have gone to the party alone in the first place.

The Don'ts: The are the feminist type of women who claim that all men are scumbags who only want sex and care about nothing else. Like in the example before; these are not much different from the do's because they also want sex. They just bash men to make them feel better about themselves and pretend like they don't have a sex drive. When reality hits them they realize they do.


You see; I find it funny how women go against men who want sex. After all; just about EVERYONE has a sex drive so they are going to end up wanting sex.

Yes; women target men just like men target women. And in the end; all other factors ignored; women want exactly the same thing.

I just thing that because men have a dick there urge to satisfy themselves by having sex is MUCH stronger.

But, disregarding all other variables men and women are exactly the same. Neither gender is worse than the other because after all we are the exact same species.

IE men and women aren't very different.

Where do you get your expertise from then?

I agree.