Alpha females

Post Reply New Topic

It's all a matter of perspective when it comes to the definition of an Alpha Female so there is no wrong answer. In my opinion, an Alpha Female is a woman who defies the traditional female submissive behavior and may exihibit some masculine behavior.

I'm strong, confident, stubborn, intelligent, good looking, and dominant. No one messes with me or looks at me the wrong way, no body tells me what to do, even guys twice my size are scared of me. I've been told all my life that I am very intimidating.

Both my parents were Alphas

It's all a matter of perspective when it comes to the definition of an Alpha Female so there is no wrong answer. In my opinion, an Alpha Female is a woman who defies the traditional female submissive behavior and may exihibit some masculine behavior.

I'm strong, confident, stubborn, intelligent, good looking, and dominant. No one messes with me or looks at me the wrong way, no body tells me what to do, even guys twice my size are scared of me. I've been told all my life that I am very intimidating.

Both my parents were Alphas

I was under the assumption that, in pack animals, alpha females don't rule over beta males.

The toughest member of each sex finds eachother.

The alpha female will only submit to to the alpha male.

I'm a strong man and find that normally tough women will tend to defer to me.

I have found myself to be wrong, and it didn't matter. I have offered them things they didn't like, and it didn't matter. I could do no wrong in their eyes.

I would have to be responsible out of pity for her.

I suggest that the people, who you disrespected, weren't suitable to your tastes, but you weren't ruthless enough to follow through.

I like strong women just fine, and they don't dishonor me.

To each his own

As someone who is somewhere on the spectrum, I systematize very mundane things.

I understand that the system of patriarchy comes with a considerable amount of cultural baggage, but having a knowledge of my expectations provides a sense of stability for me.

I cherish things which may seem extraneous to other people, and, in so doing, am a good steward to them -- much more so to people who are pillars in my choice of lifestyle.

That someone may not be my moral authority does not at all imply that I'm a sadist.

It simply means that I reserve the right to dismiss implacable crazymakers in order to keep the peace.

I see a dynasty as being similar to a business arrangement, but I also associate hospitality with solace.

In my experience, it is a false form of authority which factionalizes his constituency, baits them with incompatible expectations, and then reconciles the parts on his own terms. This built-in lack of coordination is antithetical to the way my mind works, for I would become embroiled under the state of controlled chaos, which surrounded me.

I believe that the true seat of initiative should be able to coordinate symbiotic relationships, if this makes sense. Can the same be said of a belligerent shrew, who takes pride in being a troublemaker?

In all of their pridefulness, I never hear them bragging of what their fierceness has accomplished for others, except as helpmeets.

I hate popular and big mouthed girls, having to put up with them all through school. On the Greek alphabet I would probably be on upsilon or other ridiculously low letter. So I'm more attracted to other lower letters of any sex. Screw alphas, betas or even gammas, they are all cocky twats.

(I enjoy using the Greek alphabet as an analogy for the social ladder, it seems to be work quite well. )

I am psi.

I couldn't be an alpha-female in a relationship.
It'd feel so unnatural.

Again, I would expect homekeeping to be her primary interest.

I am not into domination and threats.

There are communities for all sorts of strange things, and there's an old-fashioned subset, also.