Are you forgetting STDs?

Post Reply New Topic

So then, as a psychoanalyst I have noticed that a large proportion of posts on this entire website are either directly sexual or inspired by innervated sexual energy.

Now, are you forgetting that God himself - nature, in other words - has ordained the death penalty for millions of sexually active people over the years? Syphilis, chlamydia, HIV ....

Just because you can 'use protection' doesn't mean that nature is not trying to dissuade us from constant 'free love'. It is quite clear that the best kind of sex is 'unprotected' natural sex with a partner who is enjoying it as much as you are. Putting a rubber on means nothing - all that does it turn sex into another stupid little game played by overgrown teenagers.

So then, how now?

Brown cow?

Thanks for your opinions?

Then as a psychoanalyst you should know that sexuality is an important part of the human condition. You should also know that AS makes it much more difficult for the average Aspie to have the types of loving relationships that NT's take for granted.

This reminds me of that Bill Bailey sketch in Part Troll:

"There’s this one celebrity, Rosie O’Donnell, a talk show host, and she said this: “I don’t know anything about Afghanistan, but I know it’s full of terrorists, speaking as a mother.”

So what is this "speaking as a mother" then? Is that a euphemism for "talking out of my arse"? "Suspending rational thought for a moment"?

As a rational human being, Al-Qaeda are a loose association of psychopathic zealots who could be rounded up with a sustained police investigation.

But speaking as a parent, they’re all eight foot tall, they’ve got lasers under their moustaches, a huge eye in their foreheads and the only way to kill them is to NUKE every country that hasn’t sent us a Christmas card in the the last 20 years!! [i]Speaking as a mother."

Just speaking as a student..

No offence to you Abraham, you're allowed your own religious opinion. But being a psychoanalyst doesn't give it any more clout than say, speaking as a binman.

Last edited by Lene on 10 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

That's like saying nature dosen't want us to cross the road because, if you're not careful, you can get run over.

Just use common sense and be safe

I thought people went to see psychoanalysts to free themselves of neuroses and guilt trips...

If the majority of the posts you're seeing on this entire website are about sex, you're hallucinating. From what I've observed, I'd more likely guess a significant number, if not the majority of people posting here have never had sex.


And IMHO, a few things in this life are worth dying for.

Religion is not one of them.

I'm really curious now. Where in the bible does it say STDs are punishment for out-of-wedlock sex? Do you just infer that it is punishment?

So tempted to say what I have on my mind, so I guess I will

TrollDar has been triggered. Since said TrollDar has been triggered, as a precaution, I recommend the following course of action.

1)Don't feed it.
2)Just get away as fast as possible.
3)If you are tempted to bash the trolls oppinion go right ahead. Now what was that phrase that I have heard online before that sums up internet arguements? "Arguing on the Internet is like competing in a reality tv show. Even if you win, You're still a stupid attention w****." (yes, I had to change the original comparison up since it could be offensive amongs alot of us, considering the old reference was about the special olympics, I did however compare it to reality TV, which is a giant pile of BS)

First of all, we are not all just wanting sex. Some of us actually do want a long term relationship, although our disability can make that difficult to get in the first place.

Secondly, nature is not trying to dissuade us from anything. Condoms have been tested well enough in the laboratory to make us reasonably confident that they will prevent STD's, like HIV, as long as they are used properly and don't break. Of course, having multiple partners will increase the risk but not everyone on this site wants that. I also want to point out that it is not correct to say that reproduction is the only function of sex. If everyone agreed with a value system that we should all remain virgins until married, then fine. But that is not the case. That's why abstinence only sex education in schools is a complete failure. The availability of condoms does not affect people who make such choice either because if people choose to abstain, they will not use them as they don't need them.

Thirdly, you do not seem like a psychologist to me. You seem more like one of those Christian evangelists trying to preach to people. If so, bugger off and do your evangelising elsewhere, please.

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:28 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:19 am


Abraham, perhaps you should contact your psychiatrist and let him know you consider yourself a psychoanalyst. I am certain he/she will find it an interesting development in your treatment.



Merle

Look at Bristol Palin (albeit a sad story). Perfect example right there of the failure of abstinence-only sex ed. Thanks Mama Palin!! !!

These replies aren't bad; I expected worse.

Keep them 'coming'.

Condoms prevent pregnancy too. It is fine if you choose abstinence, it's fine but that doesn't mean that using protection won't prevent pregnancy if you choose to have sex. Bristol Palin obviously had unprotected sex. So, what is difference whether she advocates abstinence or using protection? The fact that she got pregnant, and advocates abstinence-only, does not make a stronger case for abstinence than it does for using contraception because she obviously did not use that either.

Are you admitting to trolling? I think I missed the following quote you made earlier today in another thread:



That seems to contradict everything you said in the opening post. Don't you think?

Well, I think that 'doing it' with contraception on is a bit pointless when you compare it to the pleasure of the real deal.

Personally, I would gladly risk my life to enjoy sex without the rubber accoutrements.

It's your life. Risk it if you please. I personally wouldn't want to spend the rest of my life on anti-retrovirals because of one stupid decision. Also, who says those "rubber accouterments" take the pleasure out of it? That is just a common excuse for not taking responsibility.