A_Spock_Darkly wrote:
astaut wrote:
I am one of the 'women aren't objects to collect' types, but I totally understand what GoatOnFire is saying (I don't think that's what he meant)
Of course it's not. But think how many rabid females are out there waiting to twist the hell out of this thread to make it seem like that's what he meant.
I think I was a bit hasty writing the opener. I meant to put more about why women would be more at ease with a guy who has female friends that aren't more than friends although I am having a writing block about how to express that at the moment. What don't get is I never mentioned the word 'objects.'
Though technically speaking, depending on which definition of the word 'object' we are talking about, it would not be incorrect to view women or people as objects, somebody is inferring something. That's not the point I was making, though.
I was trying to say that even if you are rejected by a woman, it doesn't necessarily mean you can't be her friend and learn about women and possibly be introduced to a different, more compatible woman friend of hers by her. In basic terms, if she still wants to be a friend, I'm saying it's stupid to throw that away because she won't f**k you.
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?