wefunction wrote:
As a woman, I'm a little off-put by the idea that the site is providing these tips as just "being a man" or "manly man" or "the manliest way to be a man among all manly men ever".
That much is really tongue in cheek humor, its an inside joke as far as I can see. I think what its really about - a lot of guys do feel cut adrift, feel like they have no one to relate to, no one to talk about certain kinds of broader male issues with, even perhaps among friends, and that's what I actually like a lot about a lot of the blogs and/or articles in the 'A man's life' area of the site.
Then again any site like this will have some authors you agree with, some you won't, I'd take that as the nature of any site that's devoted to what seems to be a hot button issue. If its written by a far-out masculist, I probably can't relate to much. If its an article written by a guy about certain strange feelings about life that guys get often but rarely get any discussion, that's where the added value really comes in.
wefunction wrote:
Articles on communication, grooming and fashion are cool; but there's this propaganda with "restoring Manhood" that really doesn't make sense to me.
As a guy it does to me. The more wishy-washy and asexual guys get, the worse they're treated, and yet society is telling them often these days that macho is wrong. In that sense there is a lot of conflicting information out there. I'm not suggesting that all guys should be macho by any means or that it should be a high ideal, just that life has really gotten complicated for guys, as guys we need information and structure, and the more we can understand our worlds as they work the better. Restoring manhood means guys being confident in themselves as guys, for being guys. Its not just fingy sorts of people who are noticing that male identity is falling apart.
wefunction wrote:
Sources that do try to return women to a gender role that's based on servitude tend to be rejected because it provides a horrible lack of options. I don't see why we would be accepting of a source that's trying to return men to a gender role that's equally limiting.
That's just it, they're not trying to do any such thing. Its guys talking about masculinity, in today's society - 2010/2011 - as it is, as the world works today and not trying to throw back to 1950. If we do agree on that though I'm not sure what the objection is.