Premarital sex (long article) bunch of cool statistics

Post Reply New Topic

...

Last edited by Alexender on 10 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

A better reason reason is that many marriages end in divorce within the first 7 years and one does not necessarily need to get married to have a long-term relationship. Also, a wedding ring does not magically prevent you from contracting an STD from your spouse.

Disingenuous comparison. Unsafe sex practices are due to abstinence only programs that do not teach safe sex.

A healthy sex life is a biological need, and sex before marriage is perfectly moral and legal.

So I would thank you not to try and dictate morality to others.

Last edited by Sagroth on 10 Feb 2012, 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

sorry... I was not trying to seem like that

Oh, really?

"no good reason to have premarital sex."


"doesn't seem like a good enough answer."

Seems to me like you're making a judgement call on others when you have no right to.

I could care less what you choose to do with your sex life unless what you do is explicitly illegal, and that is all the right that anyone has to judge the sex life of others.

Or do you have some other reason for making this thread?

Furthermore, using a self-confessed Christian marriage site as your source is extremely biased and disingenuous. That website has a vested interest in pushing its agenda. It is not scientific in the least.

For not thinking through how this could be a dumb topic?

If I had read that it was a christian site then it would not have made since to post it, did not know it was

Fair enough. Shall we request a deletion, then?

yes, did not know that was possible, or is that just locking it?

Mostly because it turns out my source was bad.

PM a mod(hyper lesbian is around,mi think). Easy peasy.

hahaha i don't realy agree with the threath topic either its kinda ridiculous to say that you can research that people who wait until mariage have better relationships. besides how come that in tribal culture unhappynis and "divorce" isn't rampant if premaritial sex is such a bad thing. it's just a part of culture and individuel choice how people jump around with their seed. that being said the awnser to the thread by alexander was equaly rediculus just because someone doesn't think in the same maner then you do doesn't mean you should get angry at them.

Well I think casual sex is something that should be kept to a minimum due to STI risk. But obviously it's up to each individual.

Why do we get to judge other people's sex life if their sex acts are not legal? There are some really wonky laws that really shouldn't exist, but do, that aim to prevent acts that in most places are legal... Does your "right to judge" change based on location then? Do we have a "right to judge" anything, everything, nothing? Why is the law ground to judge someone?? Why are you calling someone judgmental, and then giving criteria required to be able to judge someone? Why are you the authority for this criterion? Why is your criterion good enough to enable judgment of others?

Your post seems hypocritical, please explain further.

Because most sex offenders are judged by a jury of their peers, at least in the United States.

And there has to be an exception that proves the rule. I think rapists and pedophiles are a pretty good place to draw that line, or do you disagree?

A way that sentiment is often phrased is "any sexual activity between consenting adults".

Also, I have engaged in lots of premarital sex because SEX! IS! FUN!

Pre-Marital sex isn't the problem here, people not taking the necessary precautions is.

Sorry but your conclusion based off this article is completely incorrect here.

Every couple & relationship is different, to make any sort of generalisations like the author of that article just smacks of ignorance. Especially when there is a clear bias from the writer that is easy to see.