"Imprinting" in Your Dating Life

Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

28 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm

First, let me clarify what I mean by "imprinting". It's becoming interested in the type of people with whom you were successful a particular moment in the past. For example, you were at a party, and a girl taller than you showed strong interest, enough to lead to a momentary kiss, and for quite some time after that, you find yourself attracted to tall girls, even though you generally preferred shorter girls.

Now, for a personal example. Ever since I graduated from college, I've been going to singles' dances to meet women for dating. (I didn't go while in college, 'cause then I'd stick out like a sore thumb.) Now, those dances have mostly an older crowd, so I've been quite unsuccessful there until recently. Over the course of last two years (I'm now 28 ), I found myself getting attention from older women, ages 34 to 48, at those dances. The attention ranged from a 2-minute swing dance to a full-on make-out, and it happened a few times by now. So while I brushed off older women as "too old for me" in the past, I now find myself attracted to them. It seems like the first few successful occurrences imprinted on my brain, so now it's seeking out the same thing.

So could it really be a case of imprinting, like with newly hatched ducklings and their mothers, or just a garden-variety case of going where I have a good chance of success? It's been true in the past: freshman year of college it was Asian girls, senior year and right after college it was artsy girls, and now it's older women. Now, my common sense tells me not to get serious with someone way older than me, but the attraction is still there. Is this imprinting common among aspies? Has it been true for anyone else here? Discuss.



Last edited by Aspie1 on 28 Apr 2011, 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

HopeGrows
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,565
Location: In exactly the right place at exactly the right time.

28 Apr 2011, 9:42 pm

I can't give you any statistics, but I've read that Aspies do imprint in the way you've described.


_________________
What you feel is what you are and what you are is beautiful...


AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,665
Location: Houston, Texas

28 Apr 2011, 10:36 pm

I think people in general and I've heard this called a "love map."



AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,665
Location: Houston, Texas

28 Apr 2011, 10:44 pm

Okay, about older women. I would not hold myself back from a good thing because of artificial rules. I would make it more of a point to take it step by medium step. And trust both your heart and your brain, primarily your heart. Does it continue to feel like positive energy?

An older woman does know more, if you were to ask her 'Are you hip to someone being aspie, asperger's syndrome . . ' she might well be, and she might be impressed that you can talk about it confidently and comfortably. And an older woman may well have known heartache and have come through the other side with a positive outlook.



Esther
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,575
Location: Across the Border

28 Apr 2011, 11:25 pm

This isn't about Twilight? :o



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

29 Apr 2011, 9:58 am

i think i agree with this idea. the concept of imprinting fits pretty well with my own feeling that if we open ourselves up to new experiences and give other people a chance, then we can find that our supposedly hardwired opinions can change.

i am skeptical when anyone states a preference for certain types as though it is absolutely fixed and unchangeable. i think aspies do like to hold tightly to the familiar, but a little openmindedness can shift the focus and help them to be more successful in the dating world.

but the OP's story of cougars, errrrr older women is a very good example because it is wide open and expands his options as opposed to narrowing the focus too much.some categories are too specific and can be quite restrictive. if a person living in sub-saharan africa imprinted on super-tall thai girls with buzz cuts, the opportunities could be somewhat limited.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

29 Apr 2011, 10:17 am

HopeGrows wrote:
I can't give you any statistics, but I've read that Aspies do imprint in the way you've described.


Doesn't everyone?

In common parlance we call it 'having a type'

She's my type, you're not my type, I type at 60WPM


_________________
Not currently a moderator


mv
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,131

29 Apr 2011, 10:34 am

I have a "type" that I'm always instantly physically, sexually attracted to. It (a man of that type) will turn my head on the street. For me, it's a visceral reaction. But in no way do I limit myself to that "type" when I date, I'd have an even smaller pool than I already do!

For what it's worth, I don't think my imprinting is because of a specific experience. The "type" I'm referring to is actually just the male equivalent of me, physically. I've often wondered if there's a spectrum that we all fall on that governs our visceral sexual attractions (for those of us who have them), whether some people are attracted to one "type" (and whether that type looks just like themselves) while other people don't have any strong ties one way or another. Do the people who profess to have a type describe that type as being looks-based, only, or is it also tied up in perceived cultural trappings, too?

Sexuality is such a fluid thing, after all...



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

29 Apr 2011, 12:03 pm

mv wrote:
I have a "type" that I'm always instantly physically, sexually attracted to. It (a man of that type) will turn my head on the street. For me, it's a visceral reaction. But in no way do I limit myself to that "type" when I date, I'd have an even smaller pool than I already do!

For what it's worth, I don't think my imprinting is because of a specific experience. The "type" I'm referring to is actually just the male equivalent of me, physically. I've often wondered if there's a spectrum that we all fall on that governs our visceral sexual attractions (for those of us who have them), whether some people are attracted to one "type" (and whether that type looks just like themselves) while other people don't have any strong ties one way or another. Do the people who profess to have a type describe that type as being looks-based, only, or is it also tied up in perceived cultural trappings, too?

Sexuality is such a fluid thing, after all...


For me it's a number of qualities, some are physical, some are personal characteristics. Even a particular kind of voice. I guess things like the way someone dresses or particular scents could be 'imprinted'.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


mv
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,131

29 Apr 2011, 12:24 pm

Moog wrote:
mv wrote:
I have a "type" that I'm always instantly physically, sexually attracted to. It (a man of that type) will turn my head on the street. For me, it's a visceral reaction. But in no way do I limit myself to that "type" when I date, I'd have an even smaller pool than I already do!

For what it's worth, I don't think my imprinting is because of a specific experience. The "type" I'm referring to is actually just the male equivalent of me, physically. I've often wondered if there's a spectrum that we all fall on that governs our visceral sexual attractions (for those of us who have them), whether some people are attracted to one "type" (and whether that type looks just like themselves) while other people don't have any strong ties one way or another. Do the people who profess to have a type describe that type as being looks-based, only, or is it also tied up in perceived cultural trappings, too?

Sexuality is such a fluid thing, after all...


For me it's a number of qualities, some are physical, some are personal characteristics. Even a particular kind of voice. I guess things like the way someone dresses or particular scents could be 'imprinted'.


I totally get this, and I've actually been thinking more since I posted. For example, I realized that my visceral attraction subjects age with me. I can instantly appreciate men in their 40's (where I am in age) but mostly not those in their 50's. Likewise, a 20-something can be attractive to me but in a pretty, objective way, not a visceral way. At least not in a way that's very realistic to me.

I do realize, too, now that you say it, that I have to be simpatico with someone's natural scent. And I think that's an imprinted thing, not necessarily a natural thing.

Very interesting topic!



NarcissusSavage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

01 May 2011, 3:16 pm

mv wrote:
Moog wrote:
mv wrote:
I have a "type" that I'm always instantly physically, sexually attracted to. It (a man of that type) will turn my head on the street. For me, it's a visceral reaction. But in no way do I limit myself to that "type" when I date, I'd have an even smaller pool than I already do!

For what it's worth, I don't think my imprinting is because of a specific experience. The "type" I'm referring to is actually just the male equivalent of me, physically. I've often wondered if there's a spectrum that we all fall on that governs our visceral sexual attractions (for those of us who have them), whether some people are attracted to one "type" (and whether that type looks just like themselves) while other people don't have any strong ties one way or another. Do the people who profess to have a type describe that type as being looks-based, only, or is it also tied up in perceived cultural trappings, too?

Sexuality is such a fluid thing, after all...


For me it's a number of qualities, some are physical, some are personal characteristics. Even a particular kind of voice. I guess things like the way someone dresses or particular scents could be 'imprinted'.


I totally get this, and I've actually been thinking more since I posted. For example, I realized that my visceral attraction subjects age with me. I can instantly appreciate men in their 40's (where I am in age) but mostly not those in their 50's. Likewise, a 20-something can be attractive to me but in a pretty, objective way, not a visceral way. At least not in a way that's very realistic to me.

I do realize, too, now that you say it, that I have to be simpatico with someone's natural scent. And I think that's an imprinted thing, not necessarily a natural thing.

Very interesting topic!


Studies show a link between scent attraction/repulsion and immune system variations. It's a biological thing, mostly. This far from definitive, and the whole idea of pheromones etc is much a mystery still. But I'd wager that scent and it's role in coupling is very primitive/biological, and not much influence is from learned behavior.


_________________
I am Ignostic.
Go ahead and define god, with universal acceptance of said definition.
I'll wait.


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

01 May 2011, 3:51 pm

NarcissusSavage wrote:
mv wrote:
Moog wrote:
mv wrote:
I have a "type" that I'm always instantly physically, sexually attracted to. It (a man of that type) will turn my head on the street. For me, it's a visceral reaction. But in no way do I limit myself to that "type" when I date, I'd have an even smaller pool than I already do!

For what it's worth, I don't think my imprinting is because of a specific experience. The "type" I'm referring to is actually just the male equivalent of me, physically. I've often wondered if there's a spectrum that we all fall on that governs our visceral sexual attractions (for those of us who have them), whether some people are attracted to one "type" (and whether that type looks just like themselves) while other people don't have any strong ties one way or another. Do the people who profess to have a type describe that type as being looks-based, only, or is it also tied up in perceived cultural trappings, too?

Sexuality is such a fluid thing, after all...


For me it's a number of qualities, some are physical, some are personal characteristics. Even a particular kind of voice. I guess things like the way someone dresses or particular scents could be 'imprinted'.


I totally get this, and I've actually been thinking more since I posted. For example, I realized that my visceral attraction subjects age with me. I can instantly appreciate men in their 40's (where I am in age) but mostly not those in their 50's. Likewise, a 20-something can be attractive to me but in a pretty, objective way, not a visceral way. At least not in a way that's very realistic to me.

I do realize, too, now that you say it, that I have to be simpatico with someone's natural scent. And I think that's an imprinted thing, not necessarily a natural thing.

Very interesting topic!


Studies show a link between scent attraction/repulsion and immune system variations. It's a biological thing, mostly. This far from definitive, and the whole idea of pheromones etc is much a mystery still. But I'd wager that scent and it's role in coupling is very primitive/biological, and not much influence is from learned behavior.


Hmm, I wonder if aspies smell atypical.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

01 May 2011, 10:36 pm

I only had one girl in my life & we really connected & I'd love to find a girl who's like that again so this imprinting theory seems quite possible in my case


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition