HisDivineMajesty wrote:
bucephalus wrote:
I understand that people on here are trying to explain that the stereotypes (women-materials, men-appearance) are well documented but it doesn't matter how things are weighted because it equates to the same thing. And that's just the shallow part of the population taken care of...
No. They're actually members of the general population. And here's how it works. Generally, women weigh status above anything and men weigh physical attraction over anything - despite what both groups indicate they desire in theory. In one set of research, people were asked to describe several aspects of their ideal partner. They did - and they usually put aside everything on their list for status and looks, respectively.
Sweetleaf wrote:
Well unless you are in fact one of these 'bullies' why would you feel belittled by this?
Because research - practical experiments - are often dismissed here, especially by women, in favour of feel-good stories about how we're all unique little snowflakes with our own preferences. We're not unique - we are all driven in some way by our most basic urges. And according to experiments carried out so far, those basic urges usually override or replace every theoretical desire in almost any human being in an almost-complete way.
Well the thing is neither extreme is correct.....sure females have flaws, and maybe many are driven by rather shallow things, but to generalize and say all females care about is status and that is the main driving force of all womens behavior is ridiculous. I mean I am female and well quite honestly I don't care about any of those things this 'research' claims I should care about....and I am sure there are studies that point out just as many flaws in males and attribute it to 'all' males as well. But there is no 'better' gender....there are no universal flaws every person of a specific gender has.
Basically from what I see here what exactly the basic urges are can certainly be debated.
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.