Page 1 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Apr 2013, 4:49 am

This thread should be titled: "Negative points about Online Dating and why it sucks for most men in general."

I only know why it sucks for men, if you know why it sucks for women too then you can do a parallel thread. But don't blame me for not knowing why - i am a straight male.


I have been effectively using okc and other local sites for a year, lately I have been also in contact with the 'competition' (other men) to have more overview what's really going on these sites.
Since the number of active members (of both genders) doesn't exceed the 40, I was knowing exactly who is dating who, who the ones I dated were dating (and having the FBs of those who I've dated helped too).

Here what I have concluded what's really going on and the negative things about online dating:

- Numbers: Actively seeking Men outnumbers by far the actively seeking women everywhere, even on those sites that claim to have a balanced ratio. On okc for example, women are more likely to be there just for the fun, for quizzes (or simply "I've joined it because I was bored") and for non-dating reasons than men, also fake profiles are much more often portrayed as female. No matter where you go in the online dating, the actively seeking men most likely outnumber women. After communicating with many active males there, some of those active women really don't date anyone there, they frequent those dating sites (and funnily they are the same who use several sites) for totally non-dating reasons.

- Men lack the power of choices: Because of this imbalance, dating sites becomes no different than online job boards: Males are the job seekers, females are the employers, and dating is the job interview. Job seekers are always more likely to be desperate in getting a job than an employer trying to hire a qualified one. The employer have more choices, more options, and can afford to be more picky in his terms than a job seeker (unless the job seeker is some f****** brainiac).

The employers are the ones who control the job market, not the job seekers and hence they are by far more powerful. I had tasted this power for some times when I had multiple dates (choices), like a job seeker who got more than one job offer, he would feel more powerful and would be able to up-negotiate salary and benefits; but this seldom happen to a job seeker. Most young actively-seeking women on the other hand have this power of choice all the time. And it's the employer who tries to find any reason to disqualify the candidate (1 negative point, next!), not the other way around.

Now I am certain that some of you would say this is a very dry and bleak view on dating sites, but like it or not, this is really what's going on there.

- The God's gift complex: A lot of encounters had the belief that they're god's gift for malekind, now I am not sure if dating sites attract this type of people or they develop this attitude due to the unlimited attention and offers they're getting there, egg or chicken paradox, but what I am sure of is that dating sites fuel this feeling in them. I've noticed that the more frequent the female user is, the more likely she has a this common complex. I've encountered a lot of female profiles portray this attitude - or they even portray this attitude in their messages.

-Not few females using dating sites think lowly of males using dating sites (lol): Yeah, right, a lot of them do, they are several reasons for that, one is that many males send repetitive silly "hi's" like lap dogs to every female coming online, and second is they simply think of males there have no social life and losers, and no, this isn't just a regional thing. Now here's the problem if you are a male there: you are a male using a dating site, not a very good start.

- The infinite loop of seeking the best: With or without the God's gift complex, because of the load of choices they're getting, many women stuck in this loop: She meets X, X sounds to be a great match, she replies him or dates him; Y comes in, Y sounds a better match! Dropping X like hot potato and goes for Y ...then Z comes in! ...loop. They don't invest enough time to build an emotional bond with anyone, they're stuck in seeking the best of the best of the best.... Those women remain single and dating for a long time.

That happens to exchange of messages AND dates, how many guys you've heard complaining that they were have a great conversation with a certain woman and she suddenly stopped replying? In many times, it's not always because the guy said something stupid but because a more appealing guy came into the picture.

It also happen to the dating itself, unlike the regular offline dating, even if you are successful in getting a 5th date with a certain woman, as long she's actively using the dating site then there's absolutely no guarantee that she would not drop you for a better candidate coming in.

I know exactly which male members my previous dates dated after me, a lot of them were dropped in all sudden too, and they aren't few, and all of those women remained single to this date, only one woman I've dated has a boyfriend now and she met him offline.



So I am going more offline! I got recently a date with a young woman who frequents my gym, things are so different in real life, and you're not that much at a disadvantage, as a male. Plus, I've literally squeezed dating sites hence it's getting less effective, very few new users are coming in my area.



Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 12 Apr 2013, 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

12 Apr 2013, 6:51 am

Offline is the best way to know if there's chemistry so in that respect it's a much stronger basis for a relationship

My longest relationship (of 7 years) started when I was working in a pub and he came in as a customer. You know the person likes you enough if you first meet in real life and you weren't there just to seek a relationship. It's a far more natural way of meeting a partner.

But when you get older, larger and less sociable you get so you lose confidence so don't feel so at ease in pub environments hence the need for dating sites.

I see online dating as split into two categories as far as women are concerned

there's the really good looking women who could get a partner in the real world quite easily if they went out socially often enough and then there's the less attractive women who need to show some personality in order to get peoples' interest as their looks aren't going to do it for them. They like to be able to converse with men online as it's safe and non-threatening and they get an ego boost without having to go out the house. They may not even want to meet up or they may chicken out as their confidence is often low.

The good looking ones are often doing it for a dare or a laugh ie they aren't taking it that seriously plus they often don't have the kind of personality that would relate to a male who spends a lot of time online. I've seen women on dating sites put things like 'This place is full of weirdos/nutters' concerning the men on the site. I will think to myself 'What an unpleasant woman' and assume she hasn't had the reaction off the men that she was expecting.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Apr 2013, 7:11 am

nessa238 wrote:


But when you get older, larger and less sociable you get so you lose confidence so don't feel so at ease in pub environments hence the need for dating sites.

I see online dating as split into two categories as far as women are concerned

there's the really good looking women who could get a partner in the real world quite easily if they went out socially often enough and then there's the less attractive women who need to show some personality in order to get peoples' interest as their looks aren't going to do it for them. They like to be able to converse with men online as it's safe and non-threatening and they get an ego boost without having to go out the house. They may not even want to meet up or they may chicken out as their confidence is often low.

The good looking ones are often doing it for a dare or a laugh ie they aren't taking it that seriously plus they often don't have the kind of personality that would relate to a male who spends a lot of time online. I've seen women on dating sites put things like 'This place is full of weirdos/nutters' concerning the men on the site. I will think to myself 'What an unpleasant woman' and assume she hasn't had the reaction off the men that she was expecting.


Add 'most' to your post and it can't be more true, I totally agree, the more good looking the more likely she's using it for mere attention and fun, the gorgeous one always were the case, the average looking were more clingy and more likely to build an emotional bond.

People often say there's no correlation between personality and looks, I'd call BS on this, our personalities are the result of everything, including our looks.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

12 Apr 2013, 7:17 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
nessa238 wrote:


But when you get older, larger and less sociable you get so you lose confidence so don't feel so at ease in pub environments hence the need for dating sites.

I see online dating as split into two categories as far as women are concerned

there's the really good looking women who could get a partner in the real world quite easily if they went out socially often enough and then there's the less attractive women who need to show some personality in order to get peoples' interest as their looks aren't going to do it for them. They like to be able to converse with men online as it's safe and non-threatening and they get an ego boost without having to go out the house. They may not even want to meet up or they may chicken out as their confidence is often low.

The good looking ones are often doing it for a dare or a laugh ie they aren't taking it that seriously plus they often don't have the kind of personality that would relate to a male who spends a lot of time online. I've seen women on dating sites put things like 'This place is full of weirdos/nutters' concerning the men on the site. I will think to myself 'What an unpleasant woman' and assume she hasn't had the reaction off the men that she was expecting.


Add 'most' to your post and it can't be more true, I totally agree, the more good looking the more she's using it for mere attention and fun, the gorgeous one always were the case, the average looking were more clingy and more likely to build an emotional bond.


It's easy to see why that would occur though.

Good looking people are getting the best out of people a lot of the time - the world isn't such a cold, unforgiving place as it is for the less attractive, so they can afford to be far more light-hearted and have fun as they are getting positive responses wherever they go. The less attractive mainly want comfort; for someone to say they're 'ok really'.

I think peoples' personalities are strongly influenced by how they look as it's the main factor people use for judging each other.



JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

12 Apr 2013, 9:35 am

Offline is better for me due to some of the points brought up by Boo.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Apr 2013, 10:42 am

JanuaryMan wrote:
Offline is better for me due to some of the points brought up by Boo.


You find a job first.



JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

13 Apr 2013, 10:46 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
Offline is better for me due to some of the points brought up by Boo.


You find a job first.


I'm waiting to hear back now from a few. There's a 95% chance I've got a job that pays very well. If I get it I'll update my profile to reflect my earnings on PoF and OKC as an experiment, and let you guys know the results :lol:

Seriously though in general offline works so much better for me..last night I was successful but basically ended conversations 2 women struck up with me short because a) I was catching up with my sister in the pub and b) I had like under £10 on me!



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

15 Apr 2013, 3:14 am

JanuaryMan wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
Offline is better for me due to some of the points brought up by Boo.


You find a job first.


I'm waiting to hear back now from a few. There's a 95% chance I've got a job that pays very well. If I get it I'll update my profile to reflect my earnings on PoF and OKC as an experiment, and let you guys know the results :lol:

Seriously though in general offline works so much better for me..last night I was successful but basically ended conversations 2 women struck up with me short because a) I was catching up with my sister in the pub and b) I had like under £10 on me!


Good luck, and yea offline is the better route.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

15 Apr 2013, 4:48 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
This thread should be titled: "Negative points about Online Dating and why it sucks for most men in general."

I only know why it sucks for men, if you know why it sucks for women too then you can do a parallel thread. But don't blame me for not knowing why - i am a straight male.


I have been effectively using okc and other local sites for a year, lately I have been also in contact with the 'competition' (other men) to have more overview what's really going on these sites.
Since the number of active members (of both genders) doesn't exceed the 40, I was knowing exactly who is dating who, who the ones I dated were dating (and having the FBs of those who I've dated helped too).

Here what I have concluded what's really going on and the negative things about online dating:

- Numbers: Actively seeking Men outnumbers by far the actively seeking women everywhere, even on those sites that claim to have a balanced ratio. On okc for example, women are more likely to be there just for the fun, for quizzes (or simply "I've joined it because I was bored") and for non-dating reasons than men, also fake profiles are much more often portrayed as female. No matter where you go in the online dating, the actively seeking men most likely outnumber women. After communicating with many active males there, some of those active women really don't date anyone there, they frequent those dating sites (and funnily they are the same who use several sites) for totally non-dating reasons.

- Men lack the power of choices: Because of this imbalance, dating sites becomes no different than online job boards: Males are the job seekers, females are the employers, and dating is the job interview. Job seekers are always more likely to be desperate in getting a job than an employer trying to hire a qualified one. The employer have more choices, more options, and can afford to be more picky in his terms than a job seeker (unless the job seeker is some f****** brainiac).

The employers are the ones who control the job market, not the job seekers and hence they are by far more powerful. I had tasted this power for some times when I had multiple dates (choices), like a job seeker who got more than one job offer, he would feel more powerful and would be able to up-negotiate salary and benefits; but this seldom happen to a job seeker. Most young actively-seeking women on the other hand have this power of choice all the time. And it's the employer who tries to find any reason to disqualify the candidate (1 negative point, next!), not the other way around.

Now I am certain that some of you would say this is a very dry and bleak view on dating sites, but like it or not, this is really what's going on there.

- The God's gift complex: A lot of encounters had the belief that they're god's gift for malekind, now I am not sure if dating sites attract this type of people or they develop this attitude due to the unlimited attention and offers they're getting there, egg or chicken paradox, but what I am sure of is that dating sites fuel this feeling in them. I've noticed that the more frequent the female user is, the more likely she has a this common complex. I've encountered a lot of female profiles portray this attitude - or they even portray this attitude in their messages.

-Not few females using dating sites think lowly of males using dating sites (lol): Yeah, right, a lot of them do, they are several reasons for that, one is that many males send repetitive silly "hi's" like lap dogs to every female coming online, and second is they simply think of males there have no social life and losers, and no, this isn't just a regional thing. Now here's the problem if you are a male there: you are a male using a dating site, not a very good start.

- The infinite loop of seeking the best: With or without the God's gift complex, because of the load of choices they're getting, many women stuck in this loop: She meets X, X sounds to be a great match, she replies him or dates him; Y comes in, Y sounds a better match! Dropping X like hot potato and goes for Y ...then Z comes in! ...loop. They don't invest enough time to build an emotional bond with anyone, they're stuck in seeking the best of the best of the best.... Those women remain single and dating for a long time.

That happens to exchange of messages AND dates, how many guys you've heard complaining that they were have a great conversation with a certain woman and she suddenly stopped replying? In many times, it's not always because the guy said something stupid but because a more appealing guy came into the picture.

It also happen to the dating itself, unlike the regular offline dating, even if you are successful in getting a 5th date with a certain woman, as long she's actively using the dating site then there's absolutely no guarantee that she would not drop you for a better candidate coming in.

I know exactly which male members my previous dates dated after me, a lot of them were dropped in all sudden too, and they aren't few, and all of those women remained single to this date, only one woman I've dated has a boyfriend now and she met him offline.



So I am going more offline! I got recently a date with a young woman who frequents my gym, things are so different in real life, and you're not that much at a disadvantage, as a male. Plus, I've literally squeezed dating sites hence it's getting less effective, very few new users are coming in my area.


I like your in depth analyisis, and I think a lot of what you say is true.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

16 Apr 2013, 1:30 am

*combo bump*! !



GiantHockeyFan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,293

16 Apr 2013, 11:59 am

Couldn't agree more especially with your comparison to job seeking. Here in Canada it's the exact same thing: both employers and females have the upper hand and will reject you for the most ludicrous reasons (like one interview I found out later I spent a few seconds too long looking out a window) without even getting you a chance to prove yourself yet even though numbers are on their side they STILL end up with the losers who never last and are back at it again and again because they are fooled by the smooth talker and the flashy presentation.

Only when they've been burned repeatedly do employers or women finally start to look at guys like you and me and as I'm discovering now, they are usually very damaged from all the bad candidates they "hired". My GF is still noticeably damaged from the past cheaters she was with. To contrast to my career, in one job it took me a long time to clean up the mess that was left for me to handle because they kept hiring incompetent candidates over and over. I would further add that both dating sites and job sites give the ILLUSION of choice when in reality few of the posted "jobs" are actually open to the general public and the few that are are swamped with responses, mostly by unqualified people. I'm struggling a bit with my current GF's baggage but one thing I know is that I will NEVER go online looking for love ever again because if you say one thing that's open to any interpretation whatsoever, the girl was use that to reject you using lawyerly reasoning and then proceed to complain there are no decent men left. :wall: I thought there was something wrong with me until nearly every guy I spoke to said the exact same thing about using online dating for anything more than a casual relationship.



Wolfheart
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,971
Location: Kent, England

16 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm

Best thread I have read in a while, although I have experienced success from dating websites and I have positive experiences, a lot of the points you made are very good.

It is true that many guys turn to online dating websites at first instead of using offline approaching and they think it is a reflection of real life which can be negative and not helpful.



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

16 Apr 2013, 8:40 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
This thread should be titled: "Negative points about Online Dating and why it sucks for most men in general."

I only know why it sucks for men, if you know why it sucks for women too then you can do a parallel thread. But don't blame me for not knowing why - i am a straight male.


I have been effectively using okc and other local sites for a year, lately I have been also in contact with the 'competition' (other men) to have more overview what's really going on these sites.
Since the number of active members (of both genders) doesn't exceed the 40, I was knowing exactly who is dating who, who the ones I dated were dating (and having the FBs of those who I've dated helped too).

Here what I have concluded what's really going on and the negative things about online dating:

- Numbers: Actively seeking Men outnumbers by far the actively seeking women everywhere, even on those sites that claim to have a balanced ratio. On okc for example, women are more likely to be there just for the fun, for quizzes (or simply "I've joined it because I was bored") and for non-dating reasons than men, also fake profiles are much more often portrayed as female. No matter where you go in the online dating, the actively seeking men most likely outnumber women. After communicating with many active males there, some of those active women really don't date anyone there, they frequent those dating sites (and funnily they are the same who use several sites) for totally non-dating reasons.

- Men lack the power of choices: Because of this imbalance, dating sites becomes no different than online job boards: Males are the job seekers, females are the employers, and dating is the job interview. Job seekers are always more likely to be desperate in getting a job than an employer trying to hire a qualified one. The employer have more choices, more options, and can afford to be more picky in his terms than a job seeker (unless the job seeker is some f****** brainiac).

The employers are the ones who control the job market, not the job seekers and hence they are by far more powerful. I had tasted this power for some times when I had multiple dates (choices), like a job seeker who got more than one job offer, he would feel more powerful and would be able to up-negotiate salary and benefits; but this seldom happen to a job seeker. Most young actively-seeking women on the other hand have this power of choice all the time. And it's the employer who tries to find any reason to disqualify the candidate (1 negative point, next!), not the other way around.

Now I am certain that some of you would say this is a very dry and bleak view on dating sites, but like it or not, this is really what's going on there.

- The God's gift complex: A lot of encounters had the belief that they're god's gift for malekind, now I am not sure if dating sites attract this type of people or they develop this attitude due to the unlimited attention and offers they're getting there, egg or chicken paradox, but what I am sure of is that dating sites fuel this feeling in them. I've noticed that the more frequent the female user is, the more likely she has a this common complex. I've encountered a lot of female profiles portray this attitude - or they even portray this attitude in their messages.

-Not few females using dating sites think lowly of males using dating sites (lol): Yeah, right, a lot of them do, they are several reasons for that, one is that many males send repetitive silly "hi's" like lap dogs to every female coming online, and second is they simply think of males there have no social life and losers, and no, this isn't just a regional thing. Now here's the problem if you are a male there: you are a male using a dating site, not a very good start.

- The infinite loop of seeking the best: With or without the God's gift complex, because of the load of choices they're getting, many women stuck in this loop: She meets X, X sounds to be a great match, she replies him or dates him; Y comes in, Y sounds a better match! Dropping X like hot potato and goes for Y ...then Z comes in! ...loop. They don't invest enough time to build an emotional bond with anyone, they're stuck in seeking the best of the best of the best.... Those women remain single and dating for a long time.

That happens to exchange of messages AND dates, how many guys you've heard complaining that they were have a great conversation with a certain woman and she suddenly stopped replying? In many times, it's not always because the guy said something stupid but because a more appealing guy came into the picture.

It also happen to the dating itself, unlike the regular offline dating, even if you are successful in getting a 5th date with a certain woman, as long she's actively using the dating site then there's absolutely no guarantee that she would not drop you for a better candidate coming in.

I know exactly which male members my previous dates dated after me, a lot of them were dropped in all sudden too, and they aren't few, and all of those women remained single to this date, only one woman I've dated has a boyfriend now and she met him offline.



So I am going more offline! I got recently a date with a young woman who frequents my gym, things are so different in real life, and you're not that much at a disadvantage, as a male. Plus, I've literally squeezed dating sites hence it's getting less effective, very few new users are coming in my area.


I've used both methods. So I have some qualifications to your list, that make online dating more attractive, and some things to add that are problems with online dating.

1. The dating website landscape depends highly on your location. Some locations suck for guys much more than others. I live somewhere that is "decent" but still has too many dudes. Washington, D.C. and in Asia (where these sites are full of lonely expat girls) are very good. I imagine Lebanon could be good or bad, for a variety of reasons.

2. It depends on the site. eharmony (which I've never used) and chemistry.com (also never used) supposedly give an advantage to men. OKC and POF (to a lesser extent) advantage women because these are primarily hook-up sites.

3. Offline works better for chemistry but worse for finding specific traits.

4. Your ability hook up offline is only as large as your social circle (generally). If circumstances force you to socialize predominantly with a certain group of people whom you don't consider dating material (my experience with rich, douchey, suburban law students, particularly the top ones who are in the top 10% of the class and are on law review with me and with whom I'm stuck with for multiple hours every week)

If you're a super busy person who works all the time (not quite me, given my WP post count), this can be an issue too.

5. Your ability to get someone to go out with you is only as good as your photographs (this is true). I do not photograph well, due to light sensitivity. Many aspies have similar or related problems with photographs.

6. Far too many girls are good at manipulating their photos. They look attractive up there but awful in real life.

7. It's much easier to judge flirting and attraction in context than it is otherwise. If I am on a date with a girl, I can tell if she likes me or not. Girls who go on a date with a guy and decide they don't like him have very specific behaviors. If I meet a girl without a predetermined context, I often (usually) cannot tell interest from friendliness or even coldness.



billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

16 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm

it;s all good but what do you do when you can talk to women, you can approach them but you have such a ''messed up/strange/eccentric personaliy''
and can't fake being an nt either, how can a guy like me get a date ( again in real tradition way, not the women approach first way)

plus how can I get date, when all the eccentric/weird/strange women like me are always married, or in a relationship.
( at least the one's I met,are always in a relationship)
or all the women who have a common interest are married too.



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

16 Apr 2013, 10:19 pm

billiscool wrote:
it;s all good but what do you do when you can talk to women, you can approach them but you have such a ''messed up/strange/eccentric personaliy''
and can't fake being an nt either, how can a guy like me get a date ( again in real tradition way, not the women approach first way)

plus how can I get date, when all the eccentric/weird/strange women like me are always married, or in a relationship.
( at least the one's I met,are always in a relationship)
or all the women who have a common interest are married too.


Unusual requirements/characteristics = suitable candidate for using dating websites.

Normal requirements/characteristics = suitable candidate for meeting people offline.

You appear to fall in the former category.

Some women have liked you in the past, so it's a matter of finding others like them. Perhaps you need to go somewhere or get involved in some activity that attracts autistic women. A lot of autistic girls seem to like animals, so that could be a starting point.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

17 Apr 2013, 2:26 am

Also, with the God's gift complex comes complete insanity and hostility.

Like the other day I sent a message to a young woman I chatted before a while ago "Hi ___, long time no talk", she quickly replied "I DON'T CARE, HONESTLY!!" yea, with the caps, there's a tendency for typing in caps on dating sites. Those type of women usually stay too anonymous, they refuse even to give their first names even after tons of messages.


Another young woman I've exchanged messages with, she was reacting very positively and even literally was flirting me then all of the sudden she blocked me - later I've seen profile on another dating site so I've sent her "hey, you forgot to block me here too" - and she was like "I am sorry, I have the habit to block!! too many annoying guys but not you...etc etc "; she unblocked me on the first site and after another exchange of an hour and so, she blocked me again! So I've let it go this time, later after couple of days she replied to message I've sent earlier on the other site before switching conversation to the first site, she was like "OH f**k OFF, YOU LOSER HAVE A LIFE" - so I've replied "Shut up!! Look at the date, this was an old message, I am blocking you now, bye". She unblocked me on the first site apologizing, again, saying she confused me with someone else (yeah, right).