JanuaryMan wrote:
I think according to people at WP it has to be a very black and white definition of nerdy to be a nerd (why am I not surprised?).
The people here seem to think you have to be the "whole package" so to speak to be a nerd.
No, I am trying to pin down the very sneaky way a lot of people want to engage in a particular interest/behaviour without actually being what would be seen as a stereotypical nerd - it's a paradox - they want to be nerdish but not an actual nerd as nerds are people they look down on
Despite this being an Aspegers board
There's a three-tier system going on
1. people who are nerds/geeks/(whatever the term is this week) and not ashamed of it
2. people who are the above and ashamed of it so pretending they aren't
3. people who aren't nerds/geeks but like the type of things stereotypically associated with nerds so have to get the
term redefined/messed about with to make themselves feel better/to ensure they don't get lumped in wth actual nerds,
which would cramp their style
No's 2 and 3 are all about saving face socially
No 1 is often a typical person with Aspergers who is just being themself
No's 2 and 3 seem more common to me than 1 on here
_________________
'Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality' C.G Jung