"I would bone Andy (24), but I'd never date him." said NT (27) Kate (names changed) at work - because Andy is under 30yo and therefore "has nothing to offer." (in her words) I asked what she meant for clarification, i.e. if she meant assets/wealth/established career etc - and yep, all of the above.
We've joked that she can have the guys over 30 and she can send the ones under 30 to me.
She couldn't understand why I'd be interested in dating someone under 30/younger than me (32) & I told her in reference to what she had said "because none of those things are important to me."
Myself, I'd rather have a personality/interest/aesthetic match regardless of financial wealth or career status. Sure, I want to be with someone with goals and ambitions - but those could be fitness ones, creative or scientific/research ones etc vs. career/financial. If I make my own money, great, if not ah well. If I'm with a partner and we make money, great, if not, ah well - I'd rather have love than money, basically. But Kate was abundantly clear that money was a "hygiene factor" (behavioural term) that was required before she'd even consider dating someone. She said she'd date 40+ if she had to in order to be with a guy with all of those things going for him in his life.
Curious how many here are more in line with Kate's thinking and how many are more in line with mine, regardless of any age preference. I'm guessing that the majority on this site are indifferent about financial wealth/assets and career/social status, but I could be surprised by the responses, you never know.
_________________
No

for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.