SilverStar wrote:
2. Neither sex should expect the other person to pick up the tab for them. Doing so is a sign of entitlement. Also, times have changed from when the man was the sole provider, and women work just as much as men do nowadays, so this argument just doesn't hold water anymore.
One can infer from market logic that expecting the other person to pay means their company is less valuable to you by itself than yours is to them, so they have to make up for the difference with money---or else you would't grant them the privilege of dining with you. This holds water no matter the sexes of the two people or how much they work.
Of course, the traditional premise is that the woman has inherent value as a pleasure object and a breeder---hence property---whereas the man's worth is up to his accomplishments. This way, the woman is always doing the man a favor merely by letting him interact with her, a favor which even has the cost of lowering her appeal to other, possibly worthier suitors, so naturally he has to pay her back somehow. Besides, there's no way the woman can be partially paid by enjoying the man's company, because admitting that enjoyment too much would get her branded a slut.
SilverStar wrote:
3. There is nothing wrong with treating the other person to a nice evening every once in awhile, but this shouldn't be a one-sided thing.
If one person is more valuable as a companion to the other than vice-versa, the latter has to pay the former back routinely or give up the privilege of hanging out with them.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.