Outrider wrote:
Option 2, be as broad as physically possible.
Forget about types.
Your 'type' of girl should be nothing more than 'one you are attracted to and like her personality, she is attracted to you back and likes your personality, she lives close enough to visit at least once or twice a week, and she takes care of her health, hygiene and appearance as much as the average person'.
Forget about leagues.
No one is better than anyone else.
To have the most likelihood of success, though, it's better to go for women who are no better than an opposite sex version of yourself.
For example, if you still live with your parents and can't drive yet, you'll be more likely to find success to date other women who live with their parents and can't drive yet then one's who live alone and can.
I think this is a sound way of seeing it... 'types' are a restrictive way to think unless you have enough different experiences to safely say u seen it all... but many times u dont know u like something in someone until youve had it and conversely, may think u want something that u turn up no longer wanting once youve had it ad its not how u thought it would be.