wrongcitizen wrote:
If you don't want to have a relationship it's aromantic. If you want to but you are intimidated then it is a phobia/anxiety spectrum issue.
There is a problem with being aromantic or having a romantic orientation instead of a sexual orientation. My guess based on large surveys and having analyzed this is that some asexual people are afraid that they won't be taken seriously if they have a sexual orientation. Another issue is that a lot of research claims that asexuality is on the sexual orientation spectrum as "no sexual attraction". People's (as well as animals) "orientation" is related to reproduction, and thus must be based on sexual traits, and not romantic. Additionally, romantic attachment is an exaptation of the parent-child attachment, which is not gendered. In that way, a romantic attachment is more similar to a close friendship (which is also not gendered).
As for being aromantic, I think a clue is that if people dislike typical romantic relationships which are almost expected to contain regular sex, then it's logical that they use the "aromantic" label to escape from those. Much like the asexual label mostly is a way to escape regular sex.
People should move beyond trying to avoid sex by identifying as asexual, and use better "labels". A better label that correlates highly to asexual identity is "finding sexual intercourse disgusting". That label has the advantage that it doesn't preclude having a sexual orientation/attraction, nor having a romantic relationship.