Page 3 of 5 [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

09 Nov 2019, 11:20 am

If a man could get an erection, he is “sexually functional.”

Even If he can’t, and he can bring a woman to orgasm, he is also “sexually functional.”



MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,274
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

09 Nov 2019, 12:14 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
MaxE wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
magz wrote:
I'm sure you're objectively sexual.


I am Object-oriented sexual.

I am functional sexual

(explanation forthcoming if requested)


You are sexually Haskell?

OK so you are definitely way more knowledgeable in that area than I would have ever guessed.


_________________
My WP story


SharonB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,738

09 Nov 2019, 12:57 pm

MaxE wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
You are sexually Haskell?
OK so you are definitely way more knowledgeable in that area than I would have ever guessed.

I think I'll skip on googling that and let it remain an unknown for me.



Marknis
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 24 Jan 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,960
Location: The Vile Belt

10 Nov 2019, 5:45 pm

My chances for female friendships decrease all the time. Women in my area tend to already by coupled up and are disallowed by their boyfriends or husbands to have male friends.



Archmage Arcane
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 448
Location: Connecticut, USA

11 Nov 2019, 7:28 am

SharonB wrote:
MaxE wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
You are sexually Haskell?
OK so you are definitely way more knowledgeable in that area than I would have ever guessed.

I think I'll skip on googling that and let it remain an unknown for me.


I just fix them. I don't code, at least not since the 80s. I had to Google it myself.

Haskell is 'a purely functional programming language'.

Amusing reference. :)



SharonB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,738

11 Nov 2019, 8:59 am

Archmage Arcane wrote:
SharonB wrote:
MaxE wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
You are sexually Haskell?
OK so you are definitely way more knowledgeable in that area than I would have ever guessed.

I think I'll skip on googling that and let it remain an unknown for me.


I just fix them. I don't code, at least not since the 80s. I had to Google it myself.

Haskell is 'a purely functional programming language'.

Amusing reference. :)

Thanks for taking the risk. I was on my work computer so especially risk adverse. I knew it was an inside joke, but not inside of which topic. :D



MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,274
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

11 Nov 2019, 9:42 am

SharonB wrote:
Thanks for taking the risk. I was on my work computer so especially risk adverse. I knew it was an inside joke, but not inside of which topic. :D

If you are logging into WP from your work computer, then you are less risk-averse than I. When I'm at work, I only use my phone (no WiFi in the office) for that purpose.


_________________
My WP story


Archmage Arcane
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 448
Location: Connecticut, USA

11 Nov 2019, 12:29 pm

Not a risk for me. Using my own phone.

For what it's worth:
I'm an IT admin at work, so if we had anything to log access to inappropriate material there, I would be the first to know. If anyone else wanted to know what was up, I work in a library and that was legitimate research for someone who asked a question. :)

If it had looked really shady, I would have waited and run the search on one of our public-use PCs which run in a 'sandbox'. We could theoretically see what site was visited from which computer in the network security logs if it was something really unusual, but we'd have no idea who did it unless we happened to be watching and caught it in realtime. We generally have better things to do.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

11 Nov 2019, 11:23 pm

I think the friendship first approach can work well, but I have a caveat: it has to be intended as a friendship, not someone who wants to date the person but is settling for a friendship because they don't think the other person is interested. If you are settling for a friendship because you have other reasons not to date at this point in time (working together, not feeling ready, etc) that can usually turn out OK, but not if your hope is the other person will develop interest they currently don't have. While interest can develop over time, you don't want to go into a friendship counting on it. It is also very tricky trying to change a friendship into a dating relationship, and the risk of rejection is going to be there, as it is trying to start any dating relationship. You have to know that before attempting to change the relationship, and decide if you can continue to "just be friends" if the other person is not on the same page.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

13 Nov 2019, 5:41 pm

MaxE wrote:
I certainly never had close female friends that I can recall. To me the idea of having a good female friend who becomes a lover at some unspecified time down the road is completely alien.


I agree with that. Completely alien.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

13 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm

I find friends first completely unsatisfactory. I want passion in a relationship, and the friendship road will lead to a boring relationship with poor attachment. Suboptimal in every way. A relationship should start with a crush and friendship should be last, not first.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

13 Nov 2019, 10:26 pm

rdos wrote:
I find friends first completely unsatisfactory. I want passion in a relationship, and the friendship road will lead to a boring relationship with poor attachment. Suboptimal in every way. A relationship should start with a crush and friendship should be last, not first.


That just begs the question. Why does friendship precludes passion? Intuitively, it seems like friendship and passion should go hand by hand: you feel so much in common with your friend, that you become passionate about it! On the other hand, if you compartmentalize such as "no I can't be a friend because we date", there is nothing passionate about it, just some cold-hearted rules you are trying to follow.



Marknis
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 24 Jan 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,960
Location: The Vile Belt

14 Nov 2019, 12:38 am

Why isn’t anyone replying to me?



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

14 Nov 2019, 3:57 am

QFT wrote:
rdos wrote:
I find friends first completely unsatisfactory. I want passion in a relationship, and the friendship road will lead to a boring relationship with poor attachment. Suboptimal in every way. A relationship should start with a crush and friendship should be last, not first.


That just begs the question. Why does friendship precludes passion?


Because passion is based on infatuation (past or present), and I cannot get infatuated with a friend.

QFT wrote:
Intuitively, it seems like friendship and passion should go hand by hand: you feel so much in common with your friend, that you become passionate about it!


A friendship is something that is beneficial for both parties, and preferentially without too many emotions. It only continues as long as it is still beneficial. Something that is highly incompatible with a longterm relationship.

QFT wrote:
On the other hand, if you compartmentalize such as "no I can't be a friend because we date", there is nothing passionate about it, just some cold-hearted rules you are trying to follow.


I find "dating" a highly undesirable method for starting a romantic relationship, and I have no rules.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

14 Nov 2019, 7:38 pm

Marknis wrote:
Why isn’t anyone replying to me?


Which post? If it's the one on page 3, I can't speak for anyone else, but you already know (or should, I've said it enough) my response to your predicament: MOVE. And I realize you don't feel you have that option. So I'm at a loss on how to help you, to be honest. But I do feel for you and always will.

In regards to your post on page 2, its one of several I was thinking of when I wrote my generalized response on page 3.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

14 Nov 2019, 7:42 pm

rdos wrote:
QFT wrote:
rdos wrote:
I find friends first completely unsatisfactory. I want passion in a relationship, and the friendship road will lead to a boring relationship with poor attachment. Suboptimal in every way. A relationship should start with a crush and friendship should be last, not first.


That just begs the question. Why does friendship precludes passion?


Because passion is based on infatuation (past or present), and I cannot get infatuated with a friend.



I don't agree with this as a generalized statement, that passion is based on infatuation. Passion is something that can grow and develop as you get to know more aspects of a person. I know many couples who weren't attracted to each other when they first met, but became very passionate about each other later. It's about what you are open to.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).