Page 1 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Are you ready?
80-100 29%  29%  [ 6 ]
60-80 29%  29%  [ 6 ]
40-60 14%  14%  [ 3 ]
20-40 10%  10%  [ 2 ]
0-20 19%  19%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 21

MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

07 Aug 2007, 4:45 am

Not a very good test, more to get you thinking about relationship readiness.

http://www.relationshipplanning.com/readiness.htm

I score in the 80s.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


Last edited by MrMark on 07 Aug 2007, 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Aug 2007, 5:09 am

This is what I've concluded is that I’m not really ready for a relationship. I don't mean that in the NT sense like if somebody is just not focused on that at that time. I wonder it I ever fully be. I can't really get used to it without trying, but how much is a partner willing to put up with? How unconventional can it be for it to still work?

I realise I sustained my only true friends for a year and a half because I don't see them every single day, but every couple of weeks. I do have the 'surface NT', which is just a superficial mimicry. But it is not sustainable; it is not the real thing. I'm just not sure how long they are going to put up with me. I try to reciprocate; I just can't really do it as often.

I think this emotional blunting I've got is not really helping. I can't hold my emotions. So while I might think I fancy someone, I don't really know and I don't have full emotions that I think you need. I have enough trouble understand how you do it. How you connect in the first place and then reciprocate properly? It is something that I really want.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Aug 2007, 5:15 am

:(

I'm pretty low I doubt if I'll have anything above 4, but that fact I can't really answer is probably the most telling.



TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

07 Aug 2007, 5:30 am

0_equals_true wrote:
but that fact I can't really answer is probably the most telling.


I agree but I do not care either so I'm not sad. :) Prozac has pushed me to-wards schizoid personality traits. Seems the least pro-social of the 3 SSRI's I've used.

Pro-social: zoloft > paxil > prozac



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Aug 2007, 5:30 am

I think the stage I'm as is as if, I was still a teenager in school. Not how I was back then of course. But I might be able to have a 'relationship' where you see the girl in that setting. I think. Obviously I don't want to date teenagers, I want someone my age, just it is the closest to being possible. Not really an adult relationship, with those commitments.

I think I should get in touch with my old shrink, she could help me with this. She was the first to notice I was aspie. It is weird I don't consider myself immature at all. This is what they call emotionally immature isn't it?



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,682
Location: Houston, Texas

07 Aug 2007, 7:11 am

I rate myself a 100. The main issue for me is finding someone I would actually be interested in.

Tim


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Aug 2007, 8:30 am

TheMachine1 wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
but that fact I can't really answer is probably the most telling.


I agree but I do not care either so I'm not sad. :) Prozac has pushed me to-wards schizoid personality traits. Seems the least pro-social of the 3 SSRI's I've used.

Pro-social: zoloft > paxil > prozac

Actually I thought zoloft (sertraline hydrochloride) was pretty rubbish, if anything was different I made more of a fool of myself.



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

07 Aug 2007, 9:13 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
I rate myself a 100. The main issue for me is finding someone I would actually be interested in.

Tim

Somebody told me once, "When you're ready for a relationship, you'll lower your standards."


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

07 Aug 2007, 9:44 am

0_equals_true wrote:
TheMachine1 wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
but that fact I can't really answer is probably the most telling.


I agree but I do not care either so I'm not sad. :) Prozac has pushed me to-wards schizoid personality traits. Seems the least pro-social of the 3 SSRI's I've used.

Pro-social: zoloft > paxil > prozac

Actually I thought zoloft (sertraline hydrochloride) was pretty rubbish, if anything was different I made more of a fool of myself.


Precisely the same result I had. Thats the thing pro-social merely means you are more willing to be social. It might reduce social anxiety levels but no pill can give you social skills or make your quirkiness seem normal to NTs.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

07 Aug 2007, 10:54 am

I got a 60, which is higher than I guessed. I suspect the test is flawed.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

07 Aug 2007, 11:03 am

88! Take that!

This actually puts things in perspective for me. I've been worried about one particular area and hadn't realized how far I've really come in a lot of other ways. :)



Pugly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,174
Location: Wisconsin

07 Aug 2007, 11:22 am

75

The only one I don't really have is

Quote:
I am satisfied with my work or career. My work is fulfilling, supports my lifestyle, and does not interfere with my availability for a new relationship.


And perhaps effective dating skills... but I believe I can manage with someone who is as inexperienced as I am. If they have expectations... it could spell trouble.


_________________
Wonder what it feels like to be in love?
How would you describe it, like a push or shove?
Guess I could pretend that this is all I need
Wanting more than what I have might appear as greed.


Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,682
Location: Houston, Texas

07 Aug 2007, 1:04 pm

MrMark wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
I rate myself a 100. The main issue for me is finding someone I would actually be interested in.

Tim

Somebody told me once, "When you're ready for a relationship, you'll lower your standards."


I did lower them slightly, and I went on a few dates (including a few with someone I met here on WP--but she and I decided to just be friends), so that's a good start.

Tim


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

07 Aug 2007, 2:04 pm

gwenevyn wrote:
88! Take that!


Pride much?

Yep, the test is definitely flawed. Kidding.

I scored lowest on having a clear vision of how my life will be in the future.

I actually was hoping for a lowest-range score, which recommended my actual present intent (i.e. "a relationship is not for you", or whatever it said).


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 07 Aug 2007, 2:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

07 Aug 2007, 2:08 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
MrMark wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
I rate myself a 100. The main issue for me is finding someone I would actually be interested in.

Tim

Somebody told me once, "When you're ready for a relationship, you'll lower your standards."


I did lower them slightly, and I went on a few dates (including a few with someone I met here on WP--but she and I decided to just be friends), so that's a good start.

Tim


Rigidity of standards is fine, as long as her having rigid standards about you doesn't offend you. That's something I've had to work on -- well, let's be honest, most people have to work on that -- setting higher standards for our mates than we set for ourselves, even when we don't realize it.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 07 Aug 2007, 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

07 Aug 2007, 2:11 pm

36! :P


I don't agree with the test at all though.

Going into something with a list of non-negotiables?
I mean, if I made those, I wouldn't be able to
find a human who could meet them. Not without
being with me first.