Alla wrote:
Is it possible for an aspie to be social if the career requires it?
i can not answer with authority but only with inclination, and i think it is possible as long as the AS person is in a commanding position.
idiosyncratic communication styles are accepted as "nutty professor" quirks if you are in a position of having more knowledge than them about something they need to know.
in my position, i wrote the software platforms for the company i presently work for.
every program they use (except for "MS office" applications like "excel" or "word") was conceived and written by me with no assistance or direction except for a loose specification.
that means no one but me at my company knows anything about the fundamentals of the design of my software "suites" they use every day at that company.
my bosses gave up long ago trying to understand the roots of the system i designed for them, and they give me "carte blanche" to proceed along my line of will.
so everything i say to them they accept as "strange words from the mouth of the only person who knows how the system works and the only person that can save them in a computorial emergency".
the normal workers who are using the system regard me as a person who talks in riddles and they do not understand me, but they give me the benefit of the doubt that my words mean something (albeit mysterious).
but up the street at the supermarket where no one knows anything about me, i am considered a fool. i dress sloppily and they have no proof of the validity of my mind, so they default to thinking i am inferior minded.
if i was in a job that required social skills where i was totally subordinate, and where my contribution could be replicated easily by anybody, i would fail because i really have no social skills.
people at my work assume i have alien social skills, but people on the street know that i am just a stub of a personality.
i am in a position of command at my work (i work from home but i have to go to the company's workplace reasonably often).
i think the professor you talk about has a "free ticket" that excuses his social differences, as he has obviously accomplished the requirements in his life to be trusted to "profess". (i am not comparing myself with someone of his status)
if einstein (not suggesting he was AS (groan) but using an example of "accomplishment") said "all dogs lie with their tails in mind", then that statement would be presumed to possess profound meaning. even though no one knows what the "meaning" is, there would be much scholarly devotion to solving the riddle of his presumedly profound statement.
if the same man had no fame or recognition, his statement would be dismissed as nonsense after little examination.
i think i am now so far off track with this post that i can not return to the paved road (i am lost in the woods) so i will end here.