Constitution

Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ] Go to page 1, 2 Next

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

11 Jun 2010, 8:12 pm

The Constitution of The Perfect World

Messaging: Text, Email, Social Networking Sites.
1. If a message is ignored the following happens:
o First time= warning
o Second time=warning
o Third time=Jail time. Up to forty days
2. If the person ignores a message after getting out of jail the following happens:
o Jail time/ Lethal Injection
3. If a person bombards someone who has told them that he or she is not interested in contacting the following happens:
o First time=warning
o Second time=warning
o Third time=Jail time. Up to forty days
4. If the person bombards a message after getting out of jail the following happens:
o Jail time/ Lethal Injection
Ignore:
Those are the penalties, here’s how things work.
It is against the law to ignore someone’s message.
Definition of ignore: To access a message without responding in conversation or without letting the sender know that you do not want to talk to he or she.
The government has technology which allows them to know whether one has accessed a message or not, therefore if a cell phone is dead, or if a person is not near the phone, the governemnt can feel body heat.
All messages must be opened, or the penalties above will be applied.
Bombard:
Definition of bombard: To contact a person who has already expressed that he or she does not desire to be contacted by you.
The government knows if the person did not receive the message or did not open it.

- The desire to not want to be contacted must be expressed via message, or be taken down to the police station if the person does not want to express it via message.
- Messages can only be ignored if you have already told the person that you don’t want to talk to he or she, if the message is insulting (racist, sexist, etc.), if the message does not require a response such as (ok, I’ll be there, k, etc).
- Responses that appear as if you don not want to talk to the person will be checked out by police.
- If a person cannot talk at the time, he or she must say “busy right now, don’t have time to talk, get back with me in ______”. If this happens too often the person will be investigated. If the recipient on the other end writes back before the time that the person said he or she will be busy till, then the recipient gets penalized.

Last edited by Soledad on 11 Jun 2010, 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

11 Jun 2010, 8:16 pm

Soledad wrote:

The Constitution of The Perfect World

Messaging: Text, Email, Social Networking Sites.
1. If a message is ignored the following happens:
o First time= warning
o Second time=warning
o Third time=Jail time. Up to forty days
2. If the person ignores a message after getting out of jail the following happens:
o Jail time/ Lethal Injection
3. If a person bombards someone who has told them that he or she is not interested in contacting the following happens:
o First time=warning
o Second time=warning
o Third time=Jail time. Up to forty days
4. If the person ignores a message after getting out of jail the following happens:
o Jail time/ Lethal Injection
Ignore:
Those are the penalties, here’s how things work.
It is against the law to ignore someone’s message.
Definition of ignore: To access a message without responding in conversation or without letting the sender know that you do not want to talk to he or she.
The government has technology which allows them to know whether one has accessed a message or not, therefore if a cell phone is dead, or if a person is not near the phone, the governemnt can feel body heat.
All messages must be opened, or the penalties above will be applied.
Bombard:
Definition of bombard: To contact a person who has already expressed that he or she does not desire to be contacted by you.
The government knows if the person did not receive the message or did not open it.

- The desire to not want to be contacted must be expressed via message, or be taken down to the police station if the person does not want to express it via message.
- Messages can only be ignored if you have already told the person that you don’t want to talk to he or she, if the message is insulting (racist, sexist, etc.), if the message does not require a response such as (ok, I’ll be there, k, etc).
- Responses that appear as if you don not want to talk to the person will be checked out by police.
- If a person cannot talk at the time, he or she must say “busy right now, don’t have time to talk, get back with me in ______”. If this happens too often the person will be investigated. If the recipient on the other end writes back before the time that the person said he or she will be busy till, then the recipient gets penalized.

Wow, nice sense of entitlement there.
That world seems like a nightmare to me.

_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

11 Jun 2010, 8:23 pm

It's probably because you're one of those hypocrites who ignore people. Therefore you are a nightmare

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

11 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm

The point of the constitution is to stop people from ignoring people's messages

Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

11 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm

Soledad wrote:

It's probably because you're one of those hypocrites who ignore people. Therefore you are a nightmare

No, I'm one of these people who has difficulty with interpersonal communication (as in, sometimes my ability to talk deserts me), and demands from people that I stop ignoring them make life very painful for me. Your constitution proposes punishing a lot of people for something that they can't help.
I'd be a hypocrite if I was demanding that people talk to me, but I don't. People don't owe it to anyone to talk to them.

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

11 Jun 2010, 8:39 pm

Who_Am_I wrote:

Soledad wrote:

It's probably because you're one of those hypocrites who ignore people. Therefore you are a nightmare

Did you read the constitution, all you have to say to the person is "I'm busy, talk to you later" duhhhhhhh. It's not demanding people to talk to anyone, it's demanding people to not ignore people. Ignoring a message is accessing it and disregarding it. In my constitution you cannot do that unless the message is something not worth replying to such as "ok, k, I'll be there"....I'm really forcing people to tell the truth or be honest, something that us aspies wish would be in the world. From my experiences, aspies probably favor this, and it stops a whole lot of confusion of who wants to talk to you or not. I'm not forcing anyone to be friend or talk, just tell the truth.

John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

11 Jun 2010, 9:16 pm

Soledad wrote:

You should discuss this with a therapist. They can help you come up with better ways of getting people to respond positively to you.

_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud

happymusic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,165
Location: still in ninja land

11 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

11 Jun 2010, 9:58 pm

happymusic wrote:

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Read the constitution, it says nothing about calling back. And being blocked is self explanatory to the blocked person. So you can't go to jail for blocking someone in my society because it's a straight forward way of saying I don't want to talk to you. So you have no idea what you are talking about, just shut your mouth.

Sallamandrina
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,590

11 Jun 2010, 10:31 pm

^
You've recently joined the forum, Soledad and maybe you didn't have time to read the rules, but you'll find some very useful guidelines about how to address other members - it might save you a world of hurt.

"Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live." (Oscar Wilde)

_________________
"Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live" (Oscar Wilde)

John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

11 Jun 2010, 11:29 pm

Soledad wrote:

happymusic wrote:

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Dude, this all sounds really disturbing. Get some help. It will go a long way in helping your issues with social interaction.

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

12 Jun 2010, 12:20 am

John_Browning wrote:

Soledad wrote:

happymusic wrote:

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Dude, this all sounds really disturbing. Get some help. It will go a long way in helping your issues with social interaction.

This is not disturbing, what you just said sounds ignorant

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

12 Jun 2010, 12:31 am

All everyone is doing is trying to fins something wrong with this thing. and so many people on this wonder wonder why people ignore them. This constitution and set of rules may not allow one to know why the person doesnt wanna talk, but it will allow them to know if the person doesnt wanna talk or not.

John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

12 Jun 2010, 12:33 am

Soledad wrote:

John_Browning wrote:

Soledad wrote:

happymusic wrote:

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Dude, this all sounds really disturbing. Get some help. It will go a long way in helping your issues with social interaction.

This is not disturbing, what you just said sounds ignorant

Okay, then what part of jailing and executing people for ignoring emails and facebook friend requests sounds mentally healthy to you?

Soledad
Sea Gull

Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 236

12 Jun 2010, 12:40 am

John_Browning wrote:

Soledad wrote:

John_Browning wrote:

Soledad wrote:

happymusic wrote:

I'd never call someone who really felt like this back. I'd block them, too.

Dude, this all sounds really disturbing. Get some help. It will go a long way in helping your issues with social interaction.

This is not disturbing, what you just said sounds ignorant

Okay, then what part of jailing and executing people for ignoring emails and facebook friend requests sounds mentally healthy to you?

First of all the people get warnings before they get jailed, and they get warnings and jail time before they are executed. Ignoring a friend request is bad, although I havent added that in there. But denying someone is not bad. There is a difference between ignoring a friend request and denying someone. Ignoring is leaving it there http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt128204.html, denying is giving the request attention but saying that I dont want to be this person's friend or add him or her. Denying a request is a straight forward way of saying I don't wanna be your friend, it's self explanatory. I wish the people who deny me would be executed by law, but it's just the fact that being denied is pretty self explanatory. Being ignored is not, it causes confusion and so forth. You may not even know if the person is ignoring you, which causes the person to not want to ask the other person and causes more confusion.

It's mentally healthy in the the sense that it allows people to know what's up, to know whether someone wants to contact them or not, and hence reduces confusion.

John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

12 Jun 2010, 1:48 am

You would be punishing people for avoiding confrontation with bizarre and sometimes potentially dangerously mentally unstable people. I absolutely hat it when people don't respond to my emails but I would never support a law such as what you are proposing because there are some people who are annoying and clueless and some people with a stalker mentality that are best to avoid rather than confront.

Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ] Go to page 1, 2 Next

Jump to:

Constitution Post Reply New Topic

Constitution