Page 1 of 3 [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

16 Oct 2013, 9:50 pm

Reading some of the WP posts in which people bemoan their "poor" social skills is depressing. Many of the things that are typically considered "bad" social skills are what I consider to be desirable social behavior. I would much prefer to live in a society in which people got straight to the point, said what they meant, were bluntly honest, and didn't waste my time with small talk, so it's depressing to me to read about so many people trying to hide or correct that sort of behavior. Maybe they will get what they want, and fit in better. Maybe society at large will get what it wants, and won't have to deal with or even be aware of people with non-standard social behavior. The people like me, however, will be getting the exact opposite of what they want. I can't fault people for deciding to fake it to make it (although more fake people in society is the last thing I would like), but it disturbs me to know that people actually believe that some of these things are truly "bad" and that something is wrong with them for acting that way. However, that idea segues into the autism is a neutral difference vs. autism is a horrible condition argument again...Although this behavior also seems to apply to non-autistic people as well, such the INTJ personality type.

If someone is monologuing to people who don't care and dominating the conversation, ok, that's truly an example of a lack of social skills, but I don't think that everything that is called "bad social skills" is actually negative. I think that "bad social skills" should refer to social behavior that would cause definite social problems in any society: lying, cheating, etc. Everything else is nothing more than social expectations, and they are neutral. There is nothing objectively wrong about disinterest in small talk and being incapable of sustaining it. The problem arises when a large portion of society has the same or similar social expectations, and expects and enforces them on everyone, totally disregarding individuality, and then feels entitled enough to ostracize and mistreat people when their unrealistic expectations aren't met, rather than simply stating how they prefer to socialize. In short, it's nothing more than a majority wielding it's unwarranted privilege.



PikachuDenkiNezumi
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2013
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 61

16 Oct 2013, 10:00 pm

All I have to say is I agree with all of this.

Why should I have to fix myself because other people would rather beat around the bush?



theclash123
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 105

16 Oct 2013, 11:10 pm

starkid wrote:
Reading some of the WP posts in which people bemoan their "poor" social skills is depressing. Many of the things that are typically considered "bad" social skills are what I consider to be desirable social behavior. I would much prefer to live in a society in which people got straight to the point, said what they meant, were bluntly honest, and didn't waste my time with small talk, so it's depressing to me to read about so many people trying to hide or correct that sort of behavior. Maybe they will get what they want, and fit in better. Maybe society at large will get what it wants, and won't have to deal with or even be aware of people with non-standard social behavior. The people like me, however, will be getting the exact opposite of what they want. I can't fault people for deciding to fake it to make it (although more fake people in society is the last thing I would like), but it disturbs me to know that people actually believe that some of these things are truly "bad" and that something is wrong with them for acting that way. However, that idea segues into the autism is a neutral difference vs. autism is a horrible condition argument again...Although this behavior also seems to apply to non-autistic people as well, such the INTJ personality type.

If someone is monologuing to people who don't care and dominating the conversation, ok, that's truly an example of a lack of social skills, but I don't think that everything that is called "bad social skills" is actually negative. I think that "bad social skills" should refer to social behavior that would cause definite social problems in any society: lying, cheating, etc. Everything else is nothing more than social expectations, and they are neutral. There is nothing objectively wrong about disinterest in small talk and being incapable of sustaining it. The problem arises when a large portion of society has the same or similar social expectations, and expects and enforces them on everyone, totally disregarding individuality, and then feels entitled enough to ostracize and mistreat people when their unrealistic expectations aren't met, rather than simply stating how they prefer to socialize. In short, it's nothing more than a majority wielding it's unwarranted privilege.



my former high school seemed more like a factory. 90% of the kids there dressed the same and most of them seemed to like the same stuff. Such conformity can irritate me. And small talk is subjective, some people like it, some people don't. But I agree that people shouldn't set unrealistic expectations on others, ESPECIALLY when people disregard individuality.



leafplant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,222

17 Oct 2013, 4:59 am

starkid wrote:
Reading some of the WP posts in which people bemoan their "poor" social skills is depressing. Many of the things that are typically considered "bad" social skills are what I consider to be desirable social behavior. I would much prefer to live in a society in which people got straight to the point, said what they meant, were bluntly honest, and didn't waste my time with small talk, so it's depressing to me to read about so many people trying to hide or correct that sort of behavior. Maybe they will get what they want, and fit in better. Maybe society at large will get what it wants, and won't have to deal with or even be aware of people with non-standard social behavior. The people like me, however, will be getting the exact opposite of what they want. I can't fault people for deciding to fake it to make it (although more fake people in society is the last thing I would like), but it disturbs me to know that people actually believe that some of these things are truly "bad" and that something is wrong with them for acting that way. However, that idea segues into the autism is a neutral difference vs. autism is a horrible condition argument again...Although this behavior also seems to apply to non-autistic people as well, such the INTJ personality type.

If someone is monologuing to people who don't care and dominating the conversation, ok, that's truly an example of a lack of social skills, but I don't think that everything that is called "bad social skills" is actually negative. I think that "bad social skills" should refer to social behavior that would cause definite social problems in any society: lying, cheating, etc. Everything else is nothing more than social expectations, and they are neutral. There is nothing objectively wrong about disinterest in small talk and being incapable of sustaining it. The problem arises when a large portion of society has the same or similar social expectations, and expects and enforces them on everyone, totally disregarding individuality, and then feels entitled enough to ostracize and mistreat people when their unrealistic expectations aren't met, rather than simply stating how they prefer to socialize. In short, it's nothing more than a majority wielding it's unwarranted privilege.


So many people say this (I used to be one of them, maybe still am) but forget to allow for the subconscious disqualifier 'givenses'.

For a made up example, would you be genuinely appreciative if someone told you bluntly in front of other people that you have unacceptable body odour and that you are making everyone in the company silent retch, or would you rather they pulled you to one side and told you this in a more discreet manner, or even in a roundabout way maybe?
- Maybe you really wouldn't care, maybe that's how you roll, but (in my personal experience) by and large people tend to have very fragile egos that require much egg shell walking.



coffeebean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2013
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 769
Location: MN, US

17 Oct 2013, 8:45 am

Loneliness is a compelling thing.



justkillingtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,990
Location: Washington, D.C.

17 Oct 2013, 11:15 am

I don't see why eye contact is so important. If 90% of the population had little eye contact and 10% looked people in the eye, then, maybe, poor eye contact would describe the people who looked the person in the eye.


_________________
Impermanence.


hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

17 Oct 2013, 4:05 pm

Eye contact makes someone feel that you are paying attention and listening to them. This indicates that you respect them and you value their contribution to the conversation.

I can't look into people's eyes so I look at their mouths. This seems to pass as good enough "eye contact" for people to feel like I am listening.

I understand this complaint about people not being straight-forward. I like it when I deal with people who get straight to the point. It's just easier. I can't stand middle managers, game players and attention seekers. I can't cope with how they think they are being reasonable and I am cast as the unreasonable one. It tires me out.

I have my own tastes and likes that are not considered mainstream. This makes me wonder whether people really tell others about their true tastes and things they enjoy, or do they just pretend to like what everyone else likes so that they fit in? I can't pretend and I get shunned for it. People think I am being pretentious and refusing to like "low brow" stuff, when actually I genuinely don't like Richard Curtis films and pop music. But I am thought to be offending their taste just because I don't want to do/see/hear the same thing as them. I wouldn't be offended if they didn't like my tast in music/films/books. Ugh people!



starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

17 Oct 2013, 10:48 pm

leafplant wrote:
So many people say this (I used to be one of them, maybe still am) but forget to allow for the subconscious disqualifier 'givenses'.

For a made up example, would you be genuinely appreciative if someone told you bluntly in front of other people that you have unacceptable body odour and that you are making everyone in the company silent retch, or would you rather they pulled you to one side and told you this in a more discreet manner, or even in a roundabout way maybe?


I appreciate straight-forwardness regardless of the message being delivered.

As for being told this particular thing, I can't really say that I would prefer being pulled off to the side. As far as I understand, pulling people off to the side is done because the person doing the pulling assumes that the person being told will be embarrassed. I have been told before that customers in a gym complained about my body odor, and the manager's assumption that I was embarrassed by this irritated me; the customers' offended sense of smell did not really bother me. So the reason for pulling people off to the side does not quite apply to me. On the other hand, if I was told in front of everyone, all those people would most likely also assume that I felt embarrassed, or been embarrassed for me and feel that the event was ruined, and I would find that overly emotional, be irritated that, yet again, people were guessing at my feelings. Being pulled off to the side might circumvent that social awkwardness, but that social awkwardness is caused by other people making a big deal out of nothing, not my feelings. In and of itself, it's not that big of a deal when people think that I smell bad.

So, along with the straight-forwardness, honesty, and so forth, I would also prefer a society in which people did not make assumptions about others' thoughts and feelings and did not pay so much attention to such insignificant matters, in which case no one would ever even think to pull me off to the side just to tell me that present company disliked the way that I smelled.



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

18 Oct 2013, 7:21 am

Body odour is not an insignificant matter. It is unpleasant to be around a bad smell. People go to the gym as a hobby. They want to enjoy themselves, even if it is a bit of a slog sometimes to do a workout, these places are normally called leisure centres and your being stinky makes it unpleasant for them to enjoy their leisure time. Not caring that they are being adversely affected is selfish and unkind and is significant.



Stalk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,140

18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am

Are you talking as someone that don't need a work? Or is this purely for outside of work. These days the lines seem to blur, especially if people can get let go because of their rants on Facebook or Twitter. Doing that in the work place or outside of the work place where anybody that you come in contact with recognises you and your behaviour and you would sure know about how your ranking is slipping. It's not that easy to just let go.



starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

19 Oct 2013, 8:31 pm

hurtloam wrote:
Body odour is not an insignificant matter. It is unpleasant to be around a bad smell. People go to the gym as a hobby. They want to enjoy themselves, even if it is a bit of a slog sometimes to do a workout, these places are normally called leisure centres and your being stinky makes it unpleasant for them to enjoy their leisure time. Not caring that they are being adversely affected is selfish and unkind and is significant.


First of all, what is or is not significant is a matter of opinion, and relative to circumstances. Second of all, smell is subjective, so "you being stinky" is meaningless unless interpreted as the sense perception of one or more specific people.

More specifically, I didn't mean that I don't care that people are "adversely affected." As I interpreted it, leafplant posed that example to question my feelings, so I answered with respect to my feelings, and the fact is that offending other people's sense of smell is insignificant in the sense that it does not cause me embarrassment, and ought not be such a big deal that people feel the need to segregate me just to tell me. My lack of embarrassment is not synonymous with not caring about other people.



joejoe1298
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 66
Location: US

20 Oct 2013, 11:27 pm

Starkid, I agree on a lot about what you write. I just think that it is good to socialize sometimes, even if it is not as much as NT's. To me, it does not matter if someone does not have good social skills because that is just how they are. I think it is a good idea to socialize a little, just to be in contact with people at the least.



sixstring
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 May 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 272
Location: Kortrijk, Belgium

28 Oct 2013, 8:42 am

starkid wrote:
Reading some of the WP posts in which people bemoan their "poor" social skills is depressing. Many of the things that are typically considered "bad" social skills are what I consider to be desirable social behavior. I would much prefer to live in a society in which people got straight to the point, said what they meant, were bluntly honest, and didn't waste my time with small talk, so it's depressing to me to read about so many people trying to hide or correct that sort of behavior. Maybe they will get what they want, and fit in better. Maybe society at large will get what it wants, and won't have to deal with or even be aware of people with non-standard social behavior. The people like me, however, will be getting the exact opposite of what they want. I can't fault people for deciding to fake it to make it (although more fake people in society is the last thing I would like), but it disturbs me to know that people actually believe that some of these things are truly "bad" and that something is wrong with them for acting that way. However, that idea segues into the autism is a neutral difference vs. autism is a horrible condition argument again...Although this behavior also seems to apply to non-autistic people as well, such the INTJ personality type.

If someone is monologuing to people who don't care and dominating the conversation, ok, that's truly an example of a lack of social skills, but I don't think that everything that is called "bad social skills" is actually negative. I think that "bad social skills" should refer to social behavior that would cause definite social problems in any society: lying, cheating, etc. Everything else is nothing more than social expectations, and they are neutral. There is nothing objectively wrong about disinterest in small talk and being incapable of sustaining it. The problem arises when a large portion of society has the same or similar social expectations, and expects and enforces them on everyone, totally disregarding individuality, and then feels entitled enough to ostracize and mistreat people when their unrealistic expectations aren't met, rather than simply stating how they prefer to socialize. In short, it's nothing more than a majority wielding it's unwarranted privilege.
But lying IS a social expectation...



Sherry221B
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2013
Age: 124
Gender: Female
Posts: 670
Location: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS

30 Oct 2013, 2:11 pm

I don't care if lying is a social expectation or not. If you someone lies to me, wether if that someone tells me later or not that has lied to me, I will find it out sooner or later. If someone lies to me, I will think very low of that someone after that. By lying to me, you're proving to me, and showing to me that you can't be trusted by any means, and not good. One of the things I hate the most are liars.
In some situation like that, if it's something that is not something personal of mine, I'd like to be told-I myself have no odour problems. I'm also very clean-. I don't care if there are three like thirty people in there, if I've got to fix something for good, tell me and I'l do it.
I can't stand either people who say stuff behind your back, instead of telling to you and deal with you, and things like that. I can't stand that nonsense either. If you've got to say something good, or bad, and you've got to deal with me, say it, but don't go round making me guess what's going on, and playing nonsense like that with me. I can't stand that. I know, I know, this thing of saying things behind someone's back is not related to this, but I wanted to comment it too.
I honestly, don't want to fit in, at all, if that means I can't be myself and being forced to do things I don't like. One thing I know for sure is, I'm not changing for nothing, and I stand up for what I believe in. I'd like to fit in, yes, but with someone like me. I like my individuality, and I don't want to nor wouldn't be someone's copy. I'm not like the rest either, I don't follow trends like they do, and so on.
I don't get it. I don't understand why that necessity of lying.
I think of myself as straightforward, and like to say things as they are. No twisting, nor nothing like that. I always go straight to the point, and I'm very honest. It seems people don't like that, though.
Like, if I am asked something about what I think, and it happens that I disagree. Once one was like " don't say such a thing" And, didn't let me to say much more. I didn't want to say much more, though. It would have been a waste of time. I've just said: Well, it's the truth. If you don't like it, don't ask... :roll:
Stuff like that....It irritates me. I usually am very quiet, but if I feel like I need to address something, I'll say it with no fear at all about it. I have no problem saying how things are. About small talks. I can't stand them. I don't see the point if there's no real conversation, if doesn't have substance, no deepness....If there's nothing interesting to say....I just don't see the point of that.
I'm new, by the way.



JitakuKeibiinB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 714

30 Oct 2013, 3:49 pm

Sherry221B wrote:
I don't care if lying is a social expectation or not. If you someone lies to me, wether if that someone tells me later or not that has lied to me, I will find it out sooner or later. If someone lies to me, I will think very low of that someone after that. By lying to me, you're proving to me, and showing to me that you can't be trusted by any means, and not good. One of the things I hate the most are liars.

So you don't trust anyone, then?



Sherry221B
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2013
Age: 124
Gender: Female
Posts: 670
Location: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS

31 Oct 2013, 7:18 am

I don't have anybody. If someday I have someone, I'll obviously trust that someone. Up to this day, I haven't met anybody who is trustworthy, honest, and a good person.
Just being used, lied to, etc, etc, etc. I'm not going to let that happen again. I'm not letting anybody to hurt me again.