Interesting..., I myself, overtime, have progressed, and have been granted to progress much further than where I was socially and functionally, and thus on occasion I too find that the sense of otherness and alienation from other people has significantly decreased and that social connection is becoming more natural for me.
It has caused me to sometimes wonder if it is appropriate to still say I have AS, since the above consists and consisted of the majority of the factors limiting me.
And yet, on other occasions, my remaining difficulties with AS emerge, and so I think perhaps it is appropriate to consider myself AS..., since it encompasses a broad spectrum.
Ultimately, I suppose it depends on how you define AS in the above scenario you pose in the topic's title. Do you define it by certain quirks that set you apart? Do you define it by the difficulties inherent that could limit you? Do you define it as a certain neurological configuration?
If it is defined by the difficulties it creates, and if society could hypothetically change to accommodate the difficulties so completely that they are a non-issue, then is it still AS or is it just a typical variation that one can expect?
I think such questions are an interesting consideration as to just what AS is.
_________________
Christian, Aspergian, Recovering Bundle Of Neurotic Anxieties.