Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,692
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

21 Nov 2007, 7:01 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai_Ports_World

http://www.classbrain.com/artteensb/pub ... ersy.shtml

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... 9&ft=1&f=3

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2006/march/0 ... ion1.shtml


So what do you guys think about this issue? I've kinda got my own take on how it could be resolved from both sides but I'll let that one go for a minute because I'm curious to see what other people have to say on it.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

21 Nov 2007, 7:41 pm

I thought that we should have allowed the deal to go through.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,692
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

22 Nov 2007, 1:40 am

Heh, looks like your the only person who's going to answer this probably.

I think its iffy, on one side I agree with Bush in the sense that they've been probably one of the friendliest Arab states to us, we've always had good relations with them, and about the only things that had anything to do with 9/11 that involved them really were not something they could be faulted for. I think the biggest concern though would be one of two things - either Al Queda trying to get into their shipping ranks and work their company from the inside or, alternatively, if the Arab world's fundamentalist got irritated enough about their lavish lifestyle that they staged a military coupe and overthrew what was a friendly government to the U.S.

That said though, I think it could be done but the two safeguards we'd really have to look at most are information technology and internal controls. We'd probably want to be in very close communication with them at all times, probably RFID'ing a lot of the merchandise as well as helping them to screen it, make sure its free of the kind of stuff that concerns us, and I think the more automated that process got the more practical and easy it would be come - hence the internal controls. It seems like the best way to safeguard what's actually coming in the shipping containers is to safeguard the contents at the port of departure rather than the receiving port (which of course was our biggest concern, piracy in the middle being more of a constant threat that doesn't get resolved on either end specifically).



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

22 Nov 2007, 2:13 am

Well, there is a threat from them but Al Quaeda and other groups can be found across the world. The fact that the nation is friendly means that we can trust it somewhat. As well, stopping this ends up making us look bad to other nations in terms of being biased and perhaps xenophobic, which can impact foreign investment which we want and desire. I mean, there are threats, but being skittish is merely a slow death.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,692
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

22 Nov 2007, 2:40 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
The fact that the nation is friendly means that we can trust it somewhat. As well, stopping this ends up making us look bad to other nations in terms of being biased and perhaps xenophobic, which can impact foreign investment which we want and desire.


Yeah, I think that was Bush's logic, we don't want to be profiling our allies on religion or anything of that sort - particularly when allies of that sort are actually some of our most vital allies whether its docking and refueling planes and boats or whether its having another friendly voice in the middle-east peace process.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

22 Nov 2007, 10:12 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Yeah, I think that was Bush's logic, we don't want to be profiling our allies on religion or anything of that sort - particularly when allies of that sort are actually some of our most vital allies whether its docking and refueling planes and boats or whether its having another friendly voice in the middle-east peace process.

It was Bush's logic. Given that I am more of a pro-market guy I simply went with it because of the fact this was economic intervention and because it could send a bad message to investors.