Do you believe in Karma?
duncansbass
Supporting Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 421
Location: Flatting thirds, fifths, and sevenths for over 20 years
However, I do not like to see the idea of karma used to blame people for their misfortune. Usually when I hear someone mention karma, it is in this context. Sometimes karma is referenced in order to suggest that revenge is unnecessary because fate will punish those who deserve it. I think this is silly as well. There are other, more logical, reasons to abstain from committing acts of revenge. Good things happen to "bad" people and bad things happen to "good" people.
I believe that no individual is inherently good or evil, and that every action has too many different consequences to be classified as simply "good" or "bad". It is more useful to describe the results of an action (or the intentions behind it) than to attempt to classify the action according to such a simple scheme. For example, it is more realistic to say that an action is "harmful to its targets" or "intended to cause harm" than "evil". I know that probably is not a common or popular way of thinking, but I think that it conflicts with a belief in karma.
I am reluctantly weighing in on this, as a spiritual person and as a Buddhist:
the law of karma is well stated above by EvilKimEvil, and commented well by Sinsboldly. People who do not understand Karma use such descriptions as "whatever you do comes back 3 times as powerful", or "I just helped that person out, so that must mean good karma for me', etc. In this instance of usage of the term, I'm right there with Mw99.
All Karma is amounts to cause and effect. If you throw a pebble in a pond, it creates ripples on the surface. If you watch, though your pebble has only affected a tiny area of the pond in and of itself, the ripples reach the entire pond.
If I am in a message board, and Mw99 strolls in, slaps a fist down on a table (posts something with apparant anger), the immediate result is a sound. Some hear the sound and are in a bad mood, and, interpreting the sound as an expression of anger, are thereby affected for the rest of the day by the ripples of that anger. Perhaps some hear the sound (read the post) and interpret the sound neutrally, and are affected by the same ripples in an altogether different manner. The main thing is: a happened, which caused b to happen, which in turn becomes a cause of its own, causing c. That is a very simplistic description. Nothing is that linear.
What karma is NOT is, as Mw99 says, a feel good fairy tale for vindictive sissies hungry for exultance, and I agree. Except that, when it is described that way, that's exactly what, to that person, it is. Karma was never taught in the manner that most Westerners perceive it, which is the whole feel good fairy tale thing. It was taught as the simple cause and effect thing, so that people would try to aim for beneficial acts (note absence of the word 'good'), and abstain from harmful ones. Beneficial acts, depending on the effect they cause when their ripples reach a certain part of the human pond, may have very harmful consequences. It all depends on so many circumstances no one can possibly begin to anticipate them all.
This is my view, as a Buddhist, and should not be taken as gospel (no pun intended).
_________________
Please Don't Tap On The Glass!!
Averick
Veteran
Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!
Karma also pertains to how your past lives also affect your present one.
Perhaps in your past life you were Adolf Hitler, and now you are re-living a life you had before; except maybe now, you are a larvae of a dung beetle. And now by chance, because it is rarer, you were like Mother Teresa. Like, by some divine right, you are now a chihuahua transported exclusively by Miss Paris Hilton, including hot pink tote bag with speghetti straps, tofu doggy biscuits, and cans of supreme russian cavier with a twist-off lid.
But seriously, this is really how karma works. You mustn't forget the theory of metempsychosis, if you are a buddhist.
Ha Ha Ha, I can't believe I wrote this. I wasn't meaning to be asinine.
Last edited by Averick on 25 Jan 2008, 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brittany2907
The ultimate storm is eternally on it's
Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,718
Location: New Zealand
You have a very simplified western idea of Karma.
Karma means action. Karma implies consequences. Karma is cause and effect.
There are some religious doctrines of Karma that are based on cosmic justice and reincarnation - but this is only one set of ideas about Karma. Those are faith-based, often conflicting with each other. But they are not at the root of the concept of karma.
There are hundreds of specific types of karma described in Indian thought. Some of these (like pancha karma, the five actions) are medical treatments that involve particular karmas/actions (sweating, purging, fasting, etc).
source: ye olde wikipedia
Karma does not mean that the victims of crimes deserve to be victimized because of something they did ten years ago to someone else - nor does it mean that people with birth defects are that way because they liked to step on bugs in a previous life (although some fatalists might believe that).
Averick
Veteran
Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!
I would say that is a fair statement, although I am not sold on the idea of an actual secular being called satan existing. I'd say "satan" was merely a part of all people and all creatures. It's an inner nature bred into us by our environment over a long period of time. Consciousness is a vessel to rise over this, something unique to humans. However one must strive for consciousness, many in fact most people believe they are conscious but few really are. Mind over nature.
