Zarathustra wrote:
Ah! You'd think so, wouldn't you? In Britain Hanging [Briefly] comes first, then a nice cup of tea to revive you, then disemboweling/castration, a quick [c. 8 hours] game of cricket, followed by being chopped into quarters and your head stuck on a stick at the crossroads. Following the recent implimentation of the Human Rights Act, the cricket has been dropped from the schedule.
Ahh, the good old days, when criminals had LESS rights than victims.
It all depends on the style of hanging. Being hung slowly causes slow strangulation. A short drop and a quick stop (which was the style in the sixties) breaks your neck.. in theory.
As for the thread... People are thinking in absolutes. "All people convicted of paedophilia must burn because they are evil nonces" etc ... Instead of considering each case on its own merits. "He liked regular porn but because some tards label EVERYTHING with lolita he ended up with dubious pictures and got busted". Thus, if someone in the justice system has AS, or any other conditions at all, that should be studied as part of the case, and possibly taken into account.
Consider the possibilities.. certain conditions acting upon a person of an autistic nature are akin to being tortured, either mentally or physically. Torture (despite the CIA) is against your human rights. You have a right to defend yourself. You may even be driven to the level of temporary insanity by such a thing. If I get busted for punching someone in the face for making chewing noises even AFTER they have been warned several times that the noise is to me like having nails screwed into my ears, then I want the courts to be damn well aware of that fact. Aspergers may not be an excuse, but it can aqnd does constitute a defense.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]