Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

06 Dec 2008, 5:38 pm

Macbeth wrote:
Possibly, but in my experience, I only ever met one stoner who even used his brain efficiently for anything other than building complex smoking paraphernalia. And I have met quite a few...


Correlation not causation. 90% of humanity is a waste of oxygen to start with if your looking for someone who's both a stoner and who might win the Nobel prize (both small groups of people) your looking at the same probabilities as winning the lotto.


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

06 Dec 2008, 5:53 pm

Is there a definition for this "legalisation"? Age limits? Stoned Driving Limit? Anything like that?


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

06 Dec 2008, 6:32 pm

Macbeth wrote:
Is there a definition for this "legalisation"? Age limits? Stoned Driving Limit? Anything like that?

The Swiss policy is to allow heroin production under regulated conditions and provide it to addicts to prevent them from harming themselves more than necessary by using impure/contaminated drugs or turning to crime. Marijuana would likely be subject to similar regulations as alcohol.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

06 Dec 2008, 6:39 pm

Orwell wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Is there a definition for this "legalisation"? Age limits? Stoned Driving Limit? Anything like that?

The Swiss policy is to allow heroin production under regulated conditions and provide it to addicts to prevent them from harming themselves more than necessary by using impure/contaminated drugs or turning to crime. Marijuana would likely be subject to similar regulations as alcohol.


And they might actually have to develop a test for driving under the influence rather than relying on a traffic cops judgment (it's kind of scary how many people die a year in jail from medical conditions when the police officer just thought they were high).

How do the Swiss do it I wonder?


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

06 Dec 2008, 8:03 pm

Macbeth wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Prohibition automatically made criminals out of a lot of people when it was brought in. When it was dropped, there was less crime. Correlation.

Prohibition also caused an increase in other crimes that were committed in connection to the black market, gang activity, or other ways of circumventing the new laws.

Quote:
I'm not saying it wouldnt affect crime levels.. it would. But it certainly isnt the golden goose, and it certainly would not stop all these people involved in the trade from committing crime.

Decriminalization isn't a magic bullet, no, but it would have major positive effects.


Possibly, but in my experience, I only ever met one stoner who even used his brain efficiently for anything other than building complex smoking paraphernalia. And I have met quite a few...



Having met 2 does not qualify as "quite a few". But then again, maybe the smoking culture is different out here. I know many people (including myself) who smoke. None fit the braindead stoner stereotype that you're alluding to.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

06 Dec 2008, 11:30 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Prohibition automatically made criminals out of a lot of people when it was brought in. When it was dropped, there was less crime. Correlation.

Prohibition also caused an increase in other crimes that were committed in connection to the black market, gang activity, or other ways of circumventing the new laws.

Quote:
I'm not saying it wouldnt affect crime levels.. it would. But it certainly isnt the golden goose, and it certainly would not stop all these people involved in the trade from committing crime.

Decriminalization isn't a magic bullet, no, but it would have major positive effects.


Possibly, but in my experience, I only ever met one stoner who even used his brain efficiently for anything other than building complex smoking paraphernalia. And I have met quite a few...



Having met 2 does not qualify as "quite a few". But then again, maybe the smoking culture is different out here. I know many people (including myself) who smoke. None fit the braindead stoner stereotype that you're alluding to.


Where did I say I only ever met two? And its barely a stereotype. Its an accurate description of the people I know who smoke pot.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

08 Dec 2008, 11:27 am

Macbeth wrote:
Where did I say I only ever met two? And its barely a stereotype. Its an accurate description of the people I know who smoke pot.


Again that's because your only taking into account the people you have met. Several of the people on my team smoke pot and make significant contributions to our goal of finding a solution to heavy element contamination of the potential well in a combination magnetic electrostatic containment fusion reactor.

It's not that dumb people smoke or smoking makes people dumb you just apparently haven't met a member of the less than 0.1% of the population who are both really smart and use recreational drugs.

Which suggests to me your not doing anything more significant with your life than building complex smoking paraphernalia either.


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

08 Dec 2008, 8:11 pm

Fraya wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Where did I say I only ever met two? And its barely a stereotype. Its an accurate description of the people I know who smoke pot.


Again that's because your only taking into account the people you have met. Several of the people on my team smoke pot and make significant contributions to our goal of finding a solution to heavy element contamination of the potential well in a combination magnetic electrostatic containment fusion reactor.

It's not that dumb people smoke or smoking makes people dumb you just apparently haven't met a member of the less than 0.1% of the population who are both really smart and use recreational drugs.

Which suggests to me your not doing anything more significant with your life than building complex smoking paraphernalia either.


I was responding to the stereotype comment. It isn't a stereotype if people are actually like that/doing that. And I did say I knew of at least one chap who was both intelligently creative and a stoner. And what exactly are you trying to imply? I must be the dumb kind of stoner because I haven't met any of the (by your figures) very rare clever stoners? Where did I say I even smoke pot? Too many assumptions there I feel.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]